davideisinger.com

My personal website
Log | Files | Refs | README

macwright-com-5gx64c.txt (4694B)


      1 [1]Tom MacWright
      2 
      3 [email protected]
      4 
      5 [2]Tom MacWright
      6 
      7   • [3]Writing
      8   • [4]Reading
      9   • [5]Photos
     10   • [6]Projects
     11   • [7]Drawings
     12   • [8]Micro ⇠
     13   • [9]About
     14 
     15 Auto Light Dark
     16 
     17 Accidental anonymity
     18 
     19 2026-06-24
     20 
     21 I went on a run this morning and got the idea to write this, but [13]Nolen and 
     22 [14]Robin and [15]Robin again have written other, maybe better versions of it.
     23 Still, I have some recent experience and feelings to get out there, so here
     24 goes:
     25 
     26 Like Robin, I have been getting a lot of incoming emails that follow an
     27 LLM-like formula of observation about me and how it could be relevant to some
     28 product + ask that i try the product. A lot of these seem LLM-generated.
     29 
     30 Also, I review job applications. I've been doing this for a long time, about 12
     31 years. I've read a lot of applications. In the last few months, I've started to
     32 see applications that were clearly cowritten by an LLM, link to an
     33 LLM-generated portfolio site, which then links to LLM-generated GitHub
     34 projects, with purely LLM-generated commit messages.
     35 
     36 Partly, like Robin and Nolen, my reaction is that this is sad and I don't like
     37 it. Most LLM-related stuff has made me feel bad about people, work, and the
     38 world, and this is no different. I'm no purist - I use the tools and cannot
     39 deny that they're useful and powerful.
     40 
     41 My other reaction is that I don't know anything about these people.
     42 
     43 They haven't put themselves out there. They haven't said anything true.
     44 
     45 My personal prejudice here is pretty long-standing. I've written and sung
     46 songs, and published my artwork and writing on the internet for fifteen years,
     47 and a lot of the reaction I get is about how other people couldn't because they
     48 don't know how or don't think theirs is good enough or whatever, but let me be
     49 blunt for a brief moment: putting your art, writing, expression out to be
     50 judged by others is an act of bravery as much as talent, and a lot of people
     51 lack braver-y. Sorry to say it but if you need your work to be polished and
     52 beyond reproach, that's a determination and character problem, not a skill
     53 problem.
     54 
     55 The fear is being found out for being imperfect. The fear is also for being
     56 known in general: maybe you're a real butch tough guy but your art style is
     57 playful and tender and you don't want that side to come out. Maybe your taste
     58 is weird or undeveloped and you don't want anyone to know. But the person who
     59 puts nothing out for judgment just isn't known at all.
     60 
     61 Which brings me back to the current moment: the point of resumes and portfolios
     62 is not just to list credentials, it's to give some hint as to which kind of
     63 person will be sitting next to you, to be inspired by their arc or their human
     64 characteristics and capabilities. Are they determined? Did they start off
     65 building silly stuff in neopets and work their way up to programming, or create
     66 some project based on their personal interests?
     67 
     68 The perfected, generated, prompted resume is generic and impersonal. It tells
     69 me nothing about this person, other than that they use particular tools. I
     70 can't see the inputs to their outputs, see what they typed, or the process of
     71 building.
     72 
     73 The email about why I'm the right person to try your side project says nothing
     74 about you. I don't know why you made it, who you are. I don't know your writing
     75 style. I don't have any way to connect to you as a person, and no reason to
     76 care.
     77 
     78 I wrote a while ago about how [16]Pictures are famous for their humanness, and
     79 not for their pictureness.
     80 
     81     People capable of liking some paintings or prints or whatever can rarely do
     82     so without knowing something about the artist. Again, the situation is
     83     social rather than scientific. Any work of art is half of a conversation
     84     between two human beings, and it helps a lot to know who is talking at you.
     85     Does he or she have a reputation for seriousness, for religiosity, for
     86     suffering, for concupiscence, for rebellion, for sincerity, for jokes?
     87 
     88 I commiserate with the fear of being found out, and the want of perfection. But
     89 if you want people to connect with you as a person, you can't hide behind a
     90 machine. Publish your typos and show your struggle getting going. Be a human.
     91 
     92 
     93 References:
     94 
     95 [1] https://macwright.com/
     96 [2] https://macwright.com/
     97 [3] https://macwright.com/writing/
     98 [4] https://macwright.com/reading/
     99 [5] https://macwright.com/photos/
    100 [6] https://macwright.com/projects/
    101 [7] https://macwright.com/drawings/
    102 [8] https://macwright.com/micro/
    103 [9] https://macwright.com/about/
    104 [13] https://eieio.games/blog/legibility-of-effort/
    105 [14] https://www.robinsloan.com/lab/fourth-law/
    106 [15] https://www.robinsloan.com/lab/ai-promotion/
    107 [16] https://macwright.com/2025/10/16/the-art-is-the-person