Update testing note
This commit is contained in:
@@ -7,19 +7,31 @@ draft: false
|
||||
_(Notes for a Viget article I'm putting together)_
|
||||
|
||||
* Most importantly: **give you confidence to make changes**
|
||||
* Focus on two kinds of tests: unit and integration
|
||||
* Unit: test your objects/functions directly
|
||||
* Integration: simulated browser interactions
|
||||
* If you're building an API, you might also have request specs
|
||||
* But ideally you're testing the full integration of UI + API
|
||||
* Unit tests
|
||||
* Put complex logic into easily testable objects/functions
|
||||
* Avoid over-stubbing/mocking -- what are you even testing
|
||||
* Integration tests
|
||||
* You need proper end-to-end testing
|
||||
* Set up your data (fresh per test)
|
||||
* Visit a page
|
||||
* Interact with it
|
||||
* Make assertions about the results
|
||||
* Put complex logic into easily testable objects/functions
|
||||
* Create stub objects to stand in for network calls
|
||||
* Use [JSON Schema][1] to ensure stub stays in sync
|
||||
* Avoid over-stubbing/mocking
|
||||
* Coverage
|
||||
* We shoot for 100% in SimpleCov (So all the Ruby is tested)
|
||||
* Some consider this too high or too burdensome -- I don't
|
||||
* Occasionally you have to ignore some code -- e.g. something that only runs in production
|
||||
* Flaky tests are bad
|
||||
* They eat up a lot of development time (esp. as build times increase)
|
||||
* Try to stay on top of them and squash them as they arise
|
||||
* Some frameworks have `retry` options/libraries that can help (bandage not cure)
|
||||
* In general, though, flaky tests suck and generally indicate lack of quality with either your code or your tools
|
||||
|
||||
[1]: https://json-schema.org/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user