November Dispatch

This commit is contained in:
David Eisinger
2023-10-29 23:00:07 -04:00
parent eba2b1db06
commit 76110a673b
10 changed files with 3167 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,623 @@
[tr?id=1356908847688416&ev=PageView&noscript=1]
[tr?id=279433711742018&ev=PageView&noscript=1] #[1]EDM Tips » EDM Song
Structure: Arrange Your Loop into a Full Song Comments Feed
[2]alternate [3]alternate [4]alternate
IFRAME: [5]https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-N5SBWB6
[6]EDM Tips
* [7]FREE
* [8]COURSES
* [9]ABOUT
* [10]BLOG
* [11]LOGIN
* Search
____________________ ____________________ Submit
More results...
[ ]
[X]
[X]
[X]
[ ]
Filter by Custom Post Type
[X]
EDM Song Structure: Arrange Your Loop into a Full Song
[12]6 Comments
[13]Share33
[14]Tweet
33 Shares
So youve created a killer 8-bar loop and want to take your great idea
to a full song, but dont know where to go from here? Weve all been
there before!
The good news is that you dont need to feel disheartened: this is a
super common problem that happens to all music producers, and
thankfully there are some very straightforward steps you can take to
get out of the loop and to a finished arrangement….
We get stuck because it can be very difficult to imagine each
individual section of a track before it exists. So, how do we fix
this?
Start 2022 the right way! Download your FREE “New Producer Starter
Pack” here.
Lets look into EDM song structure, and use that knowledge as a
template for our own tracks almost like one of those Paint-by-Numbers
books. If you use the techniques outlined below, youll be writing full
tracks and streamlining your workflow in no time!
IFRAME:
[15]https://www.youtube.com/embed/EXx9At3iUOw?feature=oembed&iv_load_po
licy=3&modestbranding=1&rel=0&autohide=1&playsinline=0&autoplay=0
EDM Song Structure
So what exactly are the benefits of learning EDM song structure? Well,
for one, by learning the common ways in which other artists create and
sculpt their songs, we can use that as a template for when we get stuck
in creating our own music.
Additionally, using known song structures helps increase relatability
and appeal to a wider audience. The practice of purposely arranging
your music in a carefully crafted way is called arrangement, and is
used in all types of music not just Electronic Dance Music.
In most Electronic Dance Music genres, your track will be in 4/4 time.
This means that in every bar (also known as a measure), there will be 4
beats, and that the quarter note (the kick on every beat), will carry
the song.
In this format, a bar is 4 beats, and a musical phrase is usually a
multiple of 2 or 4 bars. In music theory, a phrase is generally just a
grouping of bars whose energy flows nicely. For example, your build
might contain two separate phrases; one that first hints at the melody
followed by a second that introduces a snare or clap build up.
Phrases build up, take down, or play around with the energy of a
section of your track to build interest, and create and release
tension.
However, lets take a step back and see what the main overall sections
of an EDM song structure are.
They are as follows:
* Intro
* Verse
* Build up
* Drop
Each of these distinct sections contains elements of your loop
simplified, modified, or generally expanded upon. Knowing what makes up
these sections and how theyre crafted is at the heart of how you
transform your loop into a full-fledged song.
Now, lets see a rundown of which elements each section usually
contains.
Intro
The intro is usually the simplest part of your entire track. It will
usually contain a stripped down beat to allow DJs to more easily
transition into your track, or if youre making a radio or Spotify
edit will have a very short 2 to 4 bar phrase introducing the main
theme of your track. The intro also sets the pace and expectations for
what the track will deliver. (Will it be a break-neck speed drum-n-bass
track? Will it be a more chilled-out deep house track?)
Verse
The verse is more complex than the intro, but often less complex than
the drop (or at least, conveying less energy). In vocal driven music,
this is where the majority of the storytelling of songwriting occurs,
but in a lot of EDM, this is where you establish your melodic motifs.
These motifs or small musical ideas should hint at your main drop
melody without giving away your big, exciting, energetic drop.
Build up
The build up typically contains risers, repetitive melodic motifs, and
is generally rather short (a notable exception to this rule might be an
8-minute trance track). When creating build ups, you can also consider
stripping down your percussion and drums to the bare essentials, in
order to juxtapose to the heavy drop.
Drop
The drop is the hardest hitting part of your track. This is where the
main hook of your song lies, and where the energy in your track should
be the highest. You want people to get up and dance when they hear your
drop! The drop can be very simple, or very complex; this heavily relies
on genre, so make sure to listen to your favorite songs and use them as
reference.
Structures
Many songs you hear on the radio or in the club utilize similar song
structures, with some key variation to keep it interesting. When
deciding how to structure your own track, listening and referencing
your favorite track in the same genre can be immensely valuable, as
that track is likely commercially successful and has a structure that
is proven and works.
As a high level overview, structuring your song is a bit like designing
a roller-coaster. We want to bring the listener on a journey with the
emotion and energy from the track. This will help keep your listeners
engaged, prevent them from becoming bored, and hopefully keep playing
your track for days, months, and years to come.
You can even analyse the structure of existing songs and draw in an
“energy map” using an automation line, as shown here.
There are a few ways of representing song structure, but by far the
most common is to use letters to represent each part of a track. For
example, a common song structure in pop music goes as follows:
A B D B D E D A
In this instance, the letter A stands for an intro or outtro, B stands
for a verse, D stands for a chorus or drop, and E stands for the bridge
of the song, adding variety. Using this notation, we can quickly and
easily create and plan our songs structure without getting too deep
into the details and slowing us down.
If we wanted to use a similar structure for EDM, we could use A B D B D
A or A B D E D A, both of which are fairly basic but common structures.
In this instance, however, the E section is an extended breakdown,
bridge, or a new section or extended verse.
Now we understand how song structure notation works, lets look at a
common example of a more complex EDM song structure.
A B C D B C D A
This structure breaks down like so:
* A: These are the intro and outtro of the track. They are typically
8 or 16 bars in length. In some genres, you may have 4 bar intro
and outtros; its important to reference the genre youre producing
to ensure your song fits in well with the genre.
* B: This is the verse in your track. The first verse is typically 16
bars, and the second verse is 16 or 32 bars.
* C: This is the build of the track. Both builds are typically 8 bars
in length, although in some genres can be 4 or even 10 or 12 bars
long.
* D: This is the drop of your track. A drop can vary in length but
are usually 8 to 16 bars. The second drop is typically either the
same length as the first, or slightly longer to develop a little
bit of additional energy.
EDM Song Structure - Track Breakdown
This is only one example of how you can structure your song, feel free
to deviate as much or as little as you want. During the music
production process, theres tons of room for experimentation,
innovation, and self-expression; however, the vast majority of the
time, you do not want to experiment with EDM song structure. By doing
so you make your track more difficult to understand. No need to
reinvent the wheel!
Song Structure and Genre
Now for a quick note on genre. Genre itself dictates a lot of how your
track should be structured. A tech house track is going to have a
different song structure than a future bass track, which will be
different than an EDM trap track. Additionally, the length of the track
also fairly tightly correlates to the genre, with pop-y tracks being
shorter and club and house tracks being on the longer side.
For example, future bass typically follow a more pop-like structure,
with longer fleshed out melodic verses and short 4 bar intros and
outtros. Most house music, however, has a significantly longer intro
and outtro; 8 to 16 bars, sometimes even 32. House music also typically
has fewer purely melodic elements focused in the verses and breakdowns,
and instead focuses on the vibe, atmosphere, and groove, building up to
an epic drop.
Lets take a look at [16]“Chained For Love B2A & Anklebreaker Remix”.
This is a hardstyle track and has a song structure of:
A B C D B C D A
Where A stands for your intro and outtro, B is your verse, C is the
build, and D is the drop. This is an extremely common structure in
hardstyle tracks; the verse is also typically split into a more vocal
or lower energy first half, and the second half is where your
saw-driven leads come in to introduce components of the drop melody.
Now lets examine a future bass track, [17]“Lifeline LODIS, Josh
Rubin”. This particular track has a structure like so:
A B E C D B E C D A
Note that this genre has a significantly longer intro than the previous
hardstyle track, yet the overarching structure itself is remarkably
similar. The key difference is the addition of E; which is a breakdown
or pre-build. This component lowers the energy right before the build,
allowing the producer to create a bigger feeling build.
Finally, lets take a look at a big room / EDM track. Well use
[18]“Cold Timmy Trumpet” as an example here. He utilizes the
following structure for his track:
B C D B C D A
“Cold” also shares a similar structure to the other tracks. In fact,
its virtually identical to “Chained For Love”, save for the lack of
any sort of intro, even though the sounds and overall general vibe of
the genre are strikingly different.
EDM Song Structure and Arrangement
Now we understand how songs are structured and how to structure our own
track, we need to decide on the genre we want our loop to fit, or what
genre the loop already fits. Then, identify which section of a track
your loop fits into. Is it a heavy and energetic drop, or is it more a
verse or breakdown?
Once youve figured out these overarching details, we can start to
think about how we want to structure our track. You can use your DAW or
even just a piece of paper to map out each section of our song, and
what should go where. Now its as simple as filling in the gaps with
elements from your loop, and youre well on your way to finishing your
track!
Lets go over some of the common scenarios youll find yourself in.
Starting with the Drop
Your loop is energetic and pumping; this is your drop. Lets use an A B
C D B C D A structure for our track, just like the “Chained For Love
B2A & Anklebreaker Remix” prior example.
EDM Song Structure - Straring with a Drop
Now youve identified that you have a drop, lets expand it to two
sections with a little bit of melodic or rhythmic variation on the
second iteration.
Now weve gotten a full drop, lets take a look at the build up. We can
use more filtered leads and pads, and switch up the snare or clap to a
contrasting rhythm to build tension. Well open up the filters and
speed up the percussion as the drop builds to further build up that
tension before the drop.
Lets take a look at the intro and outtro. Take the melody, simplify it
and the instrumentation, and use a stripped down drum pattern. You can
also experiment with some low and simple bass or some rhythmically
simple chord patterns. The outtro can be as simple as the intro, but
instead of bringing in elements, we take them out.
The verses should be a contrasting force to the drop, while still
maintaining a similar vibe. To quickly get down a verse idea, you can
take the drop melody, take it down to a lower register with some more
interesting rhythmic chord structures that build nicely into the build
up. We can also add our second verse, build, and drops.
EDM Song Structure - Starging with a Drop 5
Starting with a Breakdown, Verse or Intro
So your loop isnt super energetic, maybe it fits well as a verse or
intro. To generate your placeholder verses, take the idea and evolve it
with moving drum patterns and chord patterns. The build up will then
come more naturally, and you can introduce a switch-up in drum patterns
to help contrast this section from the verses and drop. Work up the
energy in the build up, adding faster drums and risers and other
effects. After this build is complete, usually youll have a solid idea
for the drop itself; if not, dont worry! Take your verse idea, take
apart a one or two bar section, and build upon it to make it as high
energy as possible.
Referencing Existing Material
If youre still struggling to build out your loop into a full track
scaffold, try using your favorite song as reference. In this example,
well use HOLIDAY by Lil Nas X, a pop and rap song.
Import the track into your DAW, and set the tempo equal to that of the
track. Sometimes your DAW will do this for you, but if not, you can
usually find it easily on Beatport or other sites.
EDM Song Structure - Referencing Existing Material
Take a listen to the song in full. As you listen, mark down where each
change occurs in the song, and what the upcoming section is.Take a
listen to the song in full. As you listen, mark down where each change
occurs in the song, and what the upcoming section is.
EDM Song Structure- Referencing Existing Material 2
After going through the entire track, youll have an accurate map of
the full track, and can use the markers as guidelines on how you can
structure your own track.
Start 2022 the right way! Download your FREE “New Producer Starter
Pack” here.
Conclusion
One of the hardest parts of music production is actually finishing your
own tracks, and not ending up with a hard drive full of unfinished
loops. However, using song structuring techniques, we can use them as
scaffolding for us to write better music, faster. When you create each
section, make sure that each section captures and holds the users
interest in its own right; the best songs are interesting throughout,
(even in the intros and outtros!), not just during the drops.
What do you struggle with most when it comes to EDM song structure?
Let us know in the comments!
[19]Share33
[20]Tweet
33 Shares
* [21]Music Theory & Arrangement
Related Posts
How to Write Catchy Melodies from Scratch (The Ultimate Guide)
Everything an Electronic Music Producer Needs to Know About Drum
Programming
About the Author
My name's Will Darling. I've been making and playing dance music for
over 25 years, and share what I've learnt on EDM Tips. Get in touch on
[22]Facebook.
Leave a Reply 6 comments
Leave a Reply:
Name * ____________________
E-Mail * ____________________
Website ____________________
[ ] Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time
I comment.
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
SUBMIT COMMENT
Δ
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
[23]←Previous post [24]Next post→
What do you want to learn?
* [25]Messages
* [26]Mixing & Mastering
* [27]Music Industry
* [28]Music Theory & Arrangement
* [29]Sound Design
* [30]Workflow & Creativity
About EDM Tips
My name is Will Darling and I'm the founder of EDM Tips. I've been
producing Electronic Dance Music for over 25 years, and each week help
my readers achieve their music goals. [31]Read More...
* 
* [32]Follow @edmtipsofficial
* 
Popular Posts
[33]The Ultimate Guide to Success in Music Production in 2022
[34]How To Make Chords
[35]The Circle of Fifths (and how to use it…)
[36]Make Better EDM Using Keys And Scales
[37]The Ultimate EDM Production Glossary
Archives
* [38]April 2023
* [39]March 2023
* [40]February 2023
* [41]January 2023
* [42]November 2022
* [43]October 2022
* [44]September 2022
* [45]July 2022
* [46]May 2022
* [47]March 2022
* [48]February 2022
* [49]January 2022
* [50]October 2021
* [51]September 2021
* [52]August 2021
* [53]June 2021
* [54]May 2021
* [55]April 2021
* [56]March 2021
* [57]February 2021
* [58]January 2021
* [59]December 2020
* [60]November 2020
* [61]October 2020
* [62]September 2020
* [63]August 2020
* [64]July 2020
* [65]June 2020
* [66]May 2020
* [67]April 2020
* [68]March 2020
* [69]February 2020
* [70]January 2020
* [71]December 2019
* [72]November 2019
* [73]October 2019
* [74]September 2019
* [75]August 2019
* [76]July 2019
* [77]June 2019
* [78]May 2019
* [79]April 2019
* [80]February 2019
* [81]January 2019
* [82]December 2018
* [83]November 2018
* [84]September 2018
* [85]August 2018
* [86]July 2018
* [87]June 2018
* [88]May 2018
* [89]April 2018
* [90]March 2018
* [91]January 2018
* [92]December 2017
* [93]November 2017
* [94]October 2017
* [95]September 2017
* [96]August 2017
* [97]July 2017
* [98]June 2017
* [99]May 2017
* [100]April 2017
* [101]February 2017
* [102]January 2017
* [103]December 2016
* [104]November 2016
* [105]October 2016
* [106]September 2016
* [107]August 2016
Copyright 2023 EDM Tips Ltd.
* [108]
* [109]
* [110]
References
Visible links:
1. https://edmtips.com/edm-song-structure/feed/
2. https://edmtips.com/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/3828
3. https://edmtips.com/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed?url=https://edmtips.com/edm-song-structure/
4. https://edmtips.com/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed?url=https://edmtips.com/edm-song-structure/&format=xml
5. https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-N5SBWB6
6. https://edmtips.com/
7. https://edmtips.com/free-guides/
8. https://edmtips.com/products/
9. https://edmtips.com/about/
10. https://edmtips.com/blog/
11. https://academy.edmtips.com/login
12. file:///var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L74532-8332TMP.html#comments
13. https://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=https://edmtips.com/edm-song-structure/
14. https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=EDM+Song+Structure:+Arrange+Your+Loop+into+a+Full+Song&url=https://edmtips.com/edm-song-structure/&via=EDMtipsOfficial
15. https://www.youtube.com/embed/EXx9At3iUOw?feature=oembed&iv_load_policy=3&modestbranding=1&rel=0&autohide=1&playsinline=0&autoplay=0
16. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-tDyFu-YzQ
17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVtRH0znmqU
18. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nld4XNwpZN8
19. https://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=https://edmtips.com/edm-song-structure/
20. https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=EDM+Song+Structure:+Arrange+Your+Loop+into+a+Full+Song&url=https://edmtips.com/edm-song-structure/&via=EDMtipsOfficial
21. https://edmtips.com/category/composition-arrangement/
22. https://www.facebook.com/EDMtipsOfficial/
23. https://edmtips.com/how-to-make-edm-like-martin-garrix/
24. https://edmtips.com/guide-into-music-production-software-for-beginners/
25. https://edmtips.com/category/messages/
26. https://edmtips.com/category/mixing-mastering/
27. https://edmtips.com/category/music-industry/
28. https://edmtips.com/category/composition-arrangement/
29. https://edmtips.com/category/sound-design/
30. https://edmtips.com/category/workflow-creativity/
31. http://edmtips.com/about/
32. http://twitter.com/http://edmtipsofficial
33. https://edmtips.com/success-music-production/
34. https://edmtips.com/how-to-make-chords/
35. https://edmtips.com/the-circle-of-fifths-and-how-to-use-it/
36. https://edmtips.com/how-to-use-keys-make-edm/
37. https://edmtips.com/ultimate-edm-production-glossary/
38. https://edmtips.com/2023/04/
39. https://edmtips.com/2023/03/
40. https://edmtips.com/2023/02/
41. https://edmtips.com/2023/01/
42. https://edmtips.com/2022/11/
43. https://edmtips.com/2022/10/
44. https://edmtips.com/2022/09/
45. https://edmtips.com/2022/07/
46. https://edmtips.com/2022/05/
47. https://edmtips.com/2022/03/
48. https://edmtips.com/2022/02/
49. https://edmtips.com/2022/01/
50. https://edmtips.com/2021/10/
51. https://edmtips.com/2021/09/
52. https://edmtips.com/2021/08/
53. https://edmtips.com/2021/06/
54. https://edmtips.com/2021/05/
55. https://edmtips.com/2021/04/
56. https://edmtips.com/2021/03/
57. https://edmtips.com/2021/02/
58. https://edmtips.com/2021/01/
59. https://edmtips.com/2020/12/
60. https://edmtips.com/2020/11/
61. https://edmtips.com/2020/10/
62. https://edmtips.com/2020/09/
63. https://edmtips.com/2020/08/
64. https://edmtips.com/2020/07/
65. https://edmtips.com/2020/06/
66. https://edmtips.com/2020/05/
67. https://edmtips.com/2020/04/
68. https://edmtips.com/2020/03/
69. https://edmtips.com/2020/02/
70. https://edmtips.com/2020/01/
71. https://edmtips.com/2019/12/
72. https://edmtips.com/2019/11/
73. https://edmtips.com/2019/10/
74. https://edmtips.com/2019/09/
75. https://edmtips.com/2019/08/
76. https://edmtips.com/2019/07/
77. https://edmtips.com/2019/06/
78. https://edmtips.com/2019/05/
79. https://edmtips.com/2019/04/
80. https://edmtips.com/2019/02/
81. https://edmtips.com/2019/01/
82. https://edmtips.com/2018/12/
83. https://edmtips.com/2018/11/
84. https://edmtips.com/2018/09/
85. https://edmtips.com/2018/08/
86. https://edmtips.com/2018/07/
87. https://edmtips.com/2018/06/
88. https://edmtips.com/2018/05/
89. https://edmtips.com/2018/04/
90. https://edmtips.com/2018/03/
91. https://edmtips.com/2018/01/
92. https://edmtips.com/2017/12/
93. https://edmtips.com/2017/11/
94. https://edmtips.com/2017/10/
95. https://edmtips.com/2017/09/
96. https://edmtips.com/2017/08/
97. https://edmtips.com/2017/07/
98. https://edmtips.com/2017/06/
99. https://edmtips.com/2017/05/
100. https://edmtips.com/2017/04/
101. https://edmtips.com/2017/02/
102. https://edmtips.com/2017/01/
103. https://edmtips.com/2016/12/
104. https://edmtips.com/2016/11/
105. https://edmtips.com/2016/10/
106. https://edmtips.com/2016/09/
107. https://edmtips.com/2016/08/
108. https://www.facebook.com/EDMtipsOfficial/
109. https://twitter.com/edmtipsofficial
110. http://youtube.com/c/edmtips?sub_confirmation=1
Hidden links:
112. https://edmtips.com/how-to-write-catchy-melodies-from-scratch-the-ultimate-guide/
113. https://edmtips.com/drum-programming/
114. https://edmtips.com/author/edmtips/

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
#[1]alternate
* [2]Home
* [3]Articles
* [4]Work
* [5]About
* (BUTTON)
The beauty of finished software
October 31, 2023
Let me introduce you to [6]WordStar 4.0, a popular word processor from
the early 80s.
Wordstar 4.0 WordStar 4.0
As old as it seems, George R.R. Martin used it to write “A Song of Ice
and Fire”.
Why would someone use such an old piece of software to write over 5,000
pages? I love how he puts it:
It does everything I want a word processing program to do and it
doesn't do anything else. I don't want any help. I hate some of
these modern systems where you type up a lowercase letter and it
becomes a capital. I don't want a capital, if I'd wanted a capital,
I would have typed the capital.[7]George R.R. Martin
This program embodies the concept of finished software — a software you
can use forever with no unneeded changes.
Finished software is software thats not expected to change, and thats
a feature! You can rely on it to do some real work.
Once you get used to the software, once the software works for you, you
dont need to learn anything new; the interface will exactly be the
same, and all your files will stay relevant. No migrations, no new
payments, no new changes.
This kind of software can be created intentionally, with a compromise
from the creators that they wont bother you with things you dont
need, and only the absolutely necessary will change, like minor updates
to make it compatible with new operating systems.
Sometimes, finished software happens accidentally; maybe the company
behind it has disappeared, or the product has been abandoned.
There are also some great examples in the UNIX world of finished
software: commands like cd(to change the current directory) or ls(to
list whats there) wont ever change in a significant way. You can rely
on them until the end of your career.
The seduction of constant updates
Our expectations for software are different from other products we use
in our daily lives.
When we buy a physical product, we accept that it wont change in its
lifetime. Well use it until it wears off, and we replace it. We can
rely on that product not evolving; the gas pedal in my car will always
be in the same place.
However, when it comes to software, we usually have the ingrained
expectations of perpetual updates. We believe that if software doesnt
evolve itll be boring, old and unusable. If we see an app with no
updates in the last year, we think the creator might be dead.
We also expect new versions of any software will be better than the
previous ones. Once its released, most of our problems will be solved!
What a deceiving lie.
Sometimes, a software upgrade is a step backward: less usable, less
stable, with new bugs. Even if its genuinely better, theres the
learning curve. You were efficient with the old version, but now your
most used button is on the other side of the screen under a hidden
menu.
Finished software is a good reminder
In a world where constant change is the norm, finished software
provides a breath of fresh air. Its a reminder that reliability,
consistency, and user satisfaction can coexist in the realm of software
development.
So the next time you find yourself yearning for the latest update,
remember that sometimes, the best software is the one that doesnt
change at all.
__________________________________________________________________
References
[1] George R.R. Martin in Conan show (2014).
[8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5REM-3nWHg.
Subscribe below to get future posts in your inbox (no spam)
____________________
____________________
Subscribe
Or use the [9]RSS feed link.
__________________________________________________________________
This site is ads-free and done in my free time. [10]Buy Me A Coffee to
help me keep working on it.
© 2023 [11]Home | [12]RSS feed | [13]Buy Me A Coffee
References
Visible links:
1. https://josem.co//articles/index.xml
2. https://josem.co/
3. https://josem.co/articles/
4. https://josem.co/work/
5. https://josem.co/about/
6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordStar
7. file:///var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L75711-7804TMP.html#rf1
8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5REM-3nWHg
9. https://josem.co/articles/index.xml
10. https://www.buymeacoffee.com/josem.co
11. https://josem.co/
12. https://josem.co/articles/index.xml
13. https://www.buymeacoffee.com/josem.co
Hidden links:
15. https://josem.co/
16. file://localhost/var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L75711-7804TMP.html#top

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,755 @@
#[1]Numb at the Lodge
[2][https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.ama
zonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F75fb5a16-c295-4898-b7e3-9ab295cd3530_378
x378.png]
[3]Numb at the Lodge
(BUTTON) (BUTTON)
Subscribe
(BUTTON) Sign in
(BUTTON)
Share this post
The internet is already over
samkriss.substack.com
(BUTTON)
Copy link
(BUTTON)
Facebook
(BUTTON)
Email
(BUTTON)
Note
(BUTTON)
Other
Discover more from Numb at the Lodge
These heavy sands are language tide and wind have silted here
Over 11,000 subscribers
____________________
(BUTTON) Subscribe
Continue reading
Sign in
The internet is already over
Our God is a devourer, who makes things only for the swallowing.
[4]Sam Kriss
Sep 18, 2022
Share
A sort of preface
Theres a phrase thats been living inside my head lately, a brain
parasite, some burrowing larva covered in thorns and barbs of words.
When it moves around in there it churns at the soft tissues like
someones stuck a very small hand blender in my skull. It repeats
itself inside the wormy cave system that used to be my thoughts. It
says you will not survive. You will not survive. You will not survive.
Earlier this year, an article in the Cut reported that the cool thing
now is to have messy hair and smoke cigarettes again. You might
remember it; the piece was widely mocked for a day or two, and then it
vanished without a trace, which is how these things tend to go. But the
headline was incredible, and it stuck with me. [5]A Vibe Shift Is
Coming. Will Any Of Us Survive It? Everyone else seemed to focus on the
vibe shift stuff, but the second part was much more interesting. To
talk about survival—what extraordinary stakes, for a piece that was, in
essence, about how young people are wearing different types of shoes
from the shoes that you, as a slightly older person who still wants to
think of themselves as young, wear. Everything is stripped back to the
rawest truth: that you are a fragile creature perishing in time. And
all you need to do is apply Betteridges Law for the real content to
shine through. No. None of you will survive.
There was an ancient thought: that Zeus feeds on the world. The
universe is cyclically consumed by the fire that engendered it. Our
God is a devourer, who makes things only for the swallowing. As it
happens, this was the first thought, the first ever written down in a
book of philosophy, the first to survive: that nothing survives, and
the blankness that birthed you will be the same hole you crawl into
again. Anaximander: Whence things have their origin, thence also their
destruction lies… In the Polynesian version, Maui tried to achieve
immortality by taking the form of a worm and slithering into the vagina
of Hine-nui-te-po, goddess of night and death.[6]1 He failed.
Hine-nui-te-pos pussy is full of obsidian teeth; when she stirred in
the night those teeth sliced clean through his body. He dribbled out
again, a loose mulch of the hero who conquered the Sun.
You will not survive is not only a frightening idea. The things I hope
for are doomed, and everything I try to create will be a failure, but
so will everything I despise.[7]2 These days, it repeats itself
whenever I see something thats trying its hardest to make me angry and
upset. Theres a whole class of these objects: theyre never
particularly interesting or important; they just exist to jab you into
thinking that the world is going in a particular direction, away from
wherever you are. One-Third Of Newborn Infants Now Describe Themselves
As Polyamorous—Heres Why Thats A Good Thing. Should I get upset about
this? Should I be concerned? Why bother? It will not survive.[8]3 Meet
The Edgy Influencers Making Holocaust Denial Hip Again. Are we in
trouble? Maybe, but even trouble is ending. Everyone That Matters Has
Started Wearing Jeans Over Their Heads With Their Arms Down The Leg
Holes And Their Faces All Cramped Up In The Sweaty Groin Region, And
They Walk Down The Street Like This, Bumping Into Things, And When They
Sit Down To Eat They Just Pour Their Subscription-Service
Meal-Replacement Slurry Over The Crotch Of Their Jeans And Lick At The
Dribblings From The Inside, And Theyre Covered In Flies And Smell Bad
And Also Theyre Naked From The Waist Down Because Their Trousers Are
On Their Heads, Thats Part Of It Too—We Show You How To Get The Look!
How proud they are of their new thing. The strong iron-hearted
man-slaying Achilles, who would not live long.
In fact, one of the things that will not survive is novelty itself:
trends, fads, fashions, scenes, vibes. We are thrown back into cyclical
time; whats growing old is the cruel demand to make things new. Its
already trite to notice that all our films are franchises now, all our
bestselling novelists have the same mass-produced non-style, and all
our pop music sounds like a tribute act.[9]4 But consider that the
cultural shift that had all those thirtysomething Cut writers so
worried about their survival is simply the return of a vague Y2K
sensibility, which was itself just an echo of the early 1980s. Angular
guitar music again, flash photography, plaid. Were on a twenty-year
loop: the time it takes for a new generation to be born, kick around
for a while, and then settle into the rhythm of the spheres.
Every time this happens, it coincides with a synodic conjunction of
Jupiter and Saturn. Jupiter, the triumphant present; Saturn,
senescence, decline. The son who castrates his father, the father who
devours his sons: once every twenty years, they are indistinguishable
in the sky. Astrologers call this the Great Chronocrator. The last one
was at the end of 2020, and itll occur twice more in my lifetime: when
these witless trendwatchers finally shuffle off, theyll be tended on
their deathbeds by a nurse with messy black eyeshadow and low-rise
scrubs. Jupiter and Saturn will burn above you as a single point, and
with your last rattling breaths youll still be asking if she thinks
youre cool. You dont get it. For oute of olde feldes, as men seith,
cometh al this newe corn fro yeer to yere. We are entering a blissful
new Middle Ages, where you simply soak in a static world until the
waters finally close in over your head.
The things that will survive are the things that are already in some
sense endless. The sea; the night; the word. Things with deep fathoms
of darkness in them.
The internet will not survive.
The argument
1. That its easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of the
internet
In 1977, Ken Olsen declared that there is no reason for any individual
to have a computer in his home. In 1995, Robert Metcalfe predicted in
InfoWorld that the internet would go spectacularly supernova and then
collapse within a year. In 2000, the Daily Mail reported that the
Internet may be just a passing fad, adding that predictions that the
Internet would revolutionise the way society works have proved wildly
inaccurate. Any day now, the millions of internet users would simply
stop, either bored or frustrated, and rejoin the real world.
Funny, isnt it? You can laugh at these people now, from your high
perch one quarter of the way into the twenty-first century. Look at
these morons, stuck in their grubby little past, who couldnt even
correctly identify the shape of the year 2022. You can see it
perfectly, because youre smart. You know that the internet has changed
everything, forever.
If you like the internet, youll point out that its given us all of
human knowledge and art and music, instantly accessible from anywhere
in the world; that you can arrive in a foreign city and immediately
guide yourself to a restaurant and translate the menu and also find out
about the interesting historical massacres that took place nearby, all
with a few lazy swipes of your finger. So many interesting little
blogs! So many bizarre subcultures! Its opened up our experience of
the world: now, nothing is out of reach.
To be honest, its difficult to reconstruct what the unbridled
techno-optimists think; theres so few of them left. Still, those who
dont like the internet usually agree with them on all the basics—they
just argue that were now in touch with the wrong sort of thing: bad
kids cartoons, bad political opinions, bad ways of relating to your
own body and others. Which is why its so important to get all this
unpleasant stuff off the system, and turn the algorithm towards what is
good and true.
They might be right, but you could go deeper. The internet has enabled
us to live, for the first time, entirely apart from other people. It
replaces everything good in life with a low-resolution [10]simulation.
A handful of sugar instead of a meal: addictive but empty, just enough
to keep you alive. It even seems to be killing off sex, replacing it
with more cheap, synthetic [11]ersatz. Our most basic biological drives
simply wither in its cold blue light. People will cheerfully admit that
the internet has destroyed their attention spans, but what its really
done away with is your ability to think. Usually, when Im doing
something boring but necessary—the washing up, or walking to the post
office—Ill constantly interrupt myself; theres a little Joycean
warbling from the back of my brain. Boredom is the dream bird that
broods the egg of experience. But when Im listlessly killing time on
the internet, there is nothing. The mind does not wander. I am not
there. That rectangular hole spews out war crimes and cutesy comedies
and affirmations and porn, all of it mixed together into one
general-purpose informational goo, and I remain in its trance, the
lifeless scroll, twitching against the screen until the sky goes dark
and Im one day closer to the end. You lose hours to—what? An endless
slideshow of barely interesting images and actively unpleasant text.
Oh, cool—more memes! You know its all very boring, brooding nothing,
but the internet addicts you to your own boredom. Ive tried heroin:
this is worse. More numb, more blank, more nowhere. A portable suicide
booth; a device for turning off your entire existence. Death is no
longer waiting for you at the far end of life. It eats away at your
short span from the inside out.
But lately Im starting to think that the last thing the internet
destroys might be itself. I think they might be vindicated, Ken Olson
and Robert Metcalfe and even, God forgive me, the Daily Mail.
In the future—not the distant future, but ten years, five—people will
remember the internet as a brief dumb enthusiasm, like phrenology or
the dirigible. They might still use computer networks to send an email
or manage their bank accounts, but those networks will not be where
culture or politics happens. The idea of spending all day online will
seem as ridiculous as sitting down in front of a nice fire to read the
phone book. Soon, people will find it incredible that for several
decades all our art was obsessed with digital computers: all those
novels and films and exhibitions about tin cans that make beeping
noises, handy if you need to multiply two big numbers together, but so
lifeless, so sexless, so grey synthetic glassy bugeyed spreadsheet
plastic drab. And all your smug chortling over the people who failed to
predict our internetty present—if anyone remembers it, itll be with
exactly the same laugh.[12]5
2. That exhausted is a whole lot more than tired
You know, secretly, even if youre pretending not to, that this thing
is nearing exhaustion. There is simply nothing there online. All
language has become rote, a halfarsed performance: even the outraged
mobs are screaming on autopilot. Even genuine crises cant interrupt
the tedium of it all, the bad jokes and predictable thinkpieces,
spat-out enzymes to digest the world. Leopards break into the temple
and drink all the sacrificial vessels dry; it keeps happening; in the
end, it can be calculated in advance and is incorporated into the
ritual. Online is not where people meaningfully express themselves;
that still happens in the remaining scraps of the nonnetworked world.
Its a parcel of time you give over to the machine. Make the motions,
chant its dusty liturgy. The newest apps even [13]literalise this:
everyone has to post a selfie at exactly the same time, an inaudible
call to prayer ringing out across the world. Recently, at a bar, I saw
the room go bright as half the patrons suddenly started posing with
their negronis. This is called being real.
Whoever you are, a role is already waiting for you. All those pouty
nineteen-year-old lowercase nymphets, so fluent in their borrowed
boredom, flatly reciting dont just choke me i want someone to cut off
my entire head. All those wide-eyed video creeps, their inhuman
enthusiasm, hi guys! hi guys!! so today were going to talk about—dont
forget to like and subscribe!! hi guys!!! Even on the deranged fringes,
a dead grammar has set in. The people who fake Tourettes for TikTok
and the people who fake schizophrenia for no reason at all. VOICES HAVE
REVEALED TO ME THAT YOUR MAILMAN IS A DEMONIC ARCHON SPAT FROM
BABYLONS SPINNING PIGMOUTH, GOD WANTS YOU TO KILL HIM WITH A ROCKET
LAUNCHER. Without even passing out of date, every mode of
internet-speak already sounds antiquated. Arent you embarrassed? Cant
you hear, under the chatter of these empty forms, a long low ancient
whine, the last mewl of that cat who wants to haz cheezburger?
When I say the internet is running dry, I am not just basing this off
vibes. The exhaustion is measurable and real. 2020 saw a grand, mostly
unnoticed shift in online behaviour: the [14]clickhogs all went
catatonic, thick tongues lolling in the muck. On Facebook, the average
engagement rate—the number of likes, comments, and shares per
follower—fell by 34%, from 0.086 to 0.057. Well, everyone knows that
the mushrooms are spreading over Facebook, hundreds of thousands of
users [15]liquefying out of its corpse every year. But the same pattern
is everywhere. Engagement fell 28% on Instagram and 15% on Twitter.
(Its [16]kept falling since.) Even on TikTok, the terrifying brainhole
of tomorrow, the walls are closing in. Until 2020, the average daily
time spent on the app kept rising in line with its growing user base;
since then the number of users has kept growing, but the thing is
capturing [17]less and less of their lives.
And this was, remember, a year in which millions of people had nothing
to do except engage with great content online—and in which, for a few
months, liking and sharing the right content became an urgent moral
duty. Back then, I thought the pandemic and the protests had
permanently hauled our collective human semi-consciousness over to the
machine. Like most of us, I couldnt see what was really happening, but
there were some people who could. Around the same time, strange new
conspiracy theories started doing the rounds: that [18]the internet is
empty, that all the human beings you used to talk to have been replaced
by bots and drones. The internet of today is entirely sterile… the
internet may seem gigantic, but its like a hot air balloon with
nothing inside. They werent wrong.
Whats happening?[19]6 Heres a story from the very early days of the
internet. In the 90s, someone I know started a collaborative online
zine, a mishmash text file of barely lucid thoughts and theories. It
was deeply weird and, in some strange corners, very popular. Years
passed and technology improved: soon, they could break the text file
into different posts, and see exactly how many people were reading each
one. They started optimising their output: the most popular posts
became the model for everything else; they found a style and voice that
worked. The result, of course, was that the entire thing became rote
and lifeless and rapidly collapsed. Much of the media is currently
going down the same path, refining itself out of existence. Aside from
the New Yorkers fussy umlauts, theres simply nothing to distinguish
any one publication from any other. (And platforms like this one are
not an alternative to the crisis-stricken media, just a further
acceleration in the process.) The same thing is happening everywhere,
to everyone. The more you relentlessly optimise your network-facing
self, the more you chase the last globs of loose attention, the more
frazzled we all become, and the less anyone will be able to sustain any
interest at all.[20]7
Everything that depends on the internet for its propagation will die.
What survives will survive in conditions of low transparency, in the
sensuous murk proper to human life.
3. That you have been plugged into a grave
For a while, it was possible to live your entire life online. The world
teemed with new services: simply dab at an app, and the machine would
summon some other slumping creature with a skin condition to deliver
your groceries, or drive you in pointless circles around town, or meet
you for overpriced drinks and awkward sex and vanish. Like everyone, I
thought this was the inevitable shape of the future. Youll own
nothing, and youll be happy. Wed all be reduced to a life spent
swapping small services for the last linty coins in our pockets. Its
Uber for dogs! Its Uber for dogshit! Its picking up a fresh, creamy
pile of dogshit with your bare hands—on your phone! But this was not a
necessary result of new technologies. The internet was not
subordinating every aspect of our lives by itself, under its own power.
The online economy is an energy sink; its only survived this far as a
parasite, in the bowels of something else.
That something else is a vast underground cavern of the dead, billions
of years old.
The Vision Fund is an investment vehicle headquartered in London and
founded by Japans SoftBank to manage some $150 billion, mostly from
the sovereign wealth funds of Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which its
poured into Uber and DoorDash and WeWork and Klarna and Slack. It
provides the money that [21]effectively subsidises your autistic
digital life. These firms could take over the market because they were
so much cheaper than the traditional competitors—but most of them were
never profitable; they survived on Saudi largesse.
Investors were willing to sit on these losses; its not as if there
were many alternatives. Capital is no longer capable of effectively
reproducing itself in the usual way, through the production of
commodities. Twenty-five years ago manufacturing represented a
[22]fifth of global GDP; in 2020 it was down to 16%. Interest rates
have hovered near zero for well over a decade as economies struggle to
grow. Until this year, governments were still issuing negative-yield
bonds, and [23]people were buying them—a predictable loss looked like
the least bad option. The only reliable source of profits is in the
extraction of raw materials: chiefly, pulling the black corpses of
trillions of prehistoric organisms out of the ground so they can be set
on fire. Which means that the feudal rulers of those corpselands—men
like King Salman, Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques—ended up sitting on
a vast reservoir of capital without many productive industries through
which it could be valorised. So, as a temporary solution, they stuck it
in the tech sector.
It didnt matter that these firms couldnt turn a profit. The real
function was not to make money in the short term; it was to suck up
vast quantities of user data. Where you go, what you buy; a perfect
snapshot of millions of ordinary lives. They were betting that this
would be the currency of the future, as fundamental as oil: the stuff
that rules the world.[24]8
They were wrong, but in the process of being wrong, they created a
monster. Your frictionless digital future, your very important culture
wars, your entire sense of self—its just a waste byproduct of the
perfectly ordinary, centuries-old global circulation of fuel, capital,
and Islam. It turns out that if these three elements are arranged in
one particular way, people will start behaving strangely. Theyll
pretend that by spending all day on the computer theyre actually
fighting fascism, or standing up for womens sex-based rights, as if
the entire terrain of combat wasnt provided by a nightmare
head-chopping theocratic state.[25]9 Theyll pretend that its normal
to dance alone in silence for a front-facing camera, or that the
intersection of art and technology is somehow an interesting place to
be. For a brief minute, youll get the sociocultural Boltzmann entity
we call the internet. But nevertheless, it was only a minute. After
nature had drawn a few breaths, the star cooled and congealed, and the
clever beasts had to die.
The tables are already being cleared at the great tech-sector
chow-down.[26]10 Online services are reverting to market prices. The
Vision Fund is the worst performing fund in SoftBanks history; in the
last quarter alone its [27]lost over $20 billion. Most of all, its
now impossible to ignore that the promise propping up the entire
networked economy—that user data could power a system of terrifyingly
precise targeted advertising—was a lie. It simply does not work. It
sees that you bought a [28]ticket to Budapest, so you get more tickets
to Budapest…All they really know about you is your shopping. Now,
large companies are cutting out their online advertising budgets
entirely, and seeing [29]no change whatsoever to their bottom line. One
study found that algorithmically targeted advertising performed worse
than ads [30]selected at random. This is what [31]sustains the entire
media, provides 80% of Googles income and 99% of Facebooks, and its
made of magic beans.
A dying animal still makes its last few spastic kicks: hence the recent
flurry of strange and stillborn ideas. Remember the Internet of Things?
Your own lightbulbs blinking out ads in seizure-inducing Morse code,
your own coffee machine calling the police if you try to feed it some
unlicensed beans. Remember the Metaverse? The grisly pink avatar of
Mark Zuckerberg, bobbing around like the ghost of someones foreskin
through the scene of the recent genocides. Wow! Its so cool to
immersively experience these bloodmires in VR! More recent attempts to
squeeze some kind of profit out of this carcass are, somehow, worse.
Heres how web3 is about to disrupt the meat industry. Every time you
buy a pound of tripe, your physical offal will be bundled with a
dedicated TripeToken, which maintains its value and rarity even after
the tripe has been eaten, thanks to a unique blockchain signature
indexed to the intestinal microbiome of the slaughtered cattle! By
eating large amounts of undercooked offal while trading TripeTokens on
secondary markets, you can incentivise the spread of your favourite
cattle diseases—and if one of the pathogens you own jumps the species
barrier to start infecting humans, youve successfully monetised the
next pandemic! Once you get sick, you can rent out portions of your own
intestinal tract to an industrial meat DAO in exchange for
SlaughterCoins. Because SlaughterCoins are linked via blockchain to the
progressive disintegration of your body, theyre guaranteed to increase
in value! And when your suffering becomes unbearable, local abattoirs
will bid to buy up your SlaughterCoin wallet in exchange for putting
you out of your misery with a bolt gun to the head! Yes, the future is
always capable of getting worse. But this future is simply never going
to happen. Not the next generation of anything, just a short-term
grift: the ships rats stripping the galley of all its silverware on
their way out.
4. That the revolution can not be digitised
If you really want to see how impotent the internet is, though, you
only have to look at politics.
Everyone agrees that the internet has [32]swallowed our entire
political discourse whole. When politicians debate, they trade crap
one-liners to be turned into gifs. Their strategists seem to think
elections are won or lost [33]on memes. Entire movements emerge out of
flatulent little echo chambers; elected representatives giddy over the
evils of seed oils or babbling about how its not their job to educate
you. And its true that the internet has changed some things: mostly,
its helped break apart the cohesive working-class communities that
produce a strong left, and turned them into vague swarms of monads. But
as a political instrument, all it can do is destroy anyone who tries to
pick it up—because everything that reproduces itself through the
internet is doomed.
Occasionally, online social movements do make something happen. A hand
emerges from out of the cloud to squish some minor individual. Lets
get her friends to denounce her! Lets find out where she lives! You
can have your sadistic fun and your righteous justice at the same time:
doesnt it feel good to be good? But these movements build no
institutions, create no collective subjects, and produce no meaningful
change. Their only power is punishment—and this game only works within
the internet, and only when everyone involved agrees to play by the
internets rules.[34]11 As soon as they run up against anything with a
separate set of values—say, a Republican Party that wants to put its
guy on the Supreme Court, #MeToo or no #MeToo—they instantly crumble.
And if, like much of the contemporary left, you're left with nothing on
which to build your political movement except a hodgepodge of online
frenzies, you will crumble too.
The post-George Floyd demonstrations might be our eras greatest
tragedy: tens of millions of people mobilised in (possibly) the largest
protest movement in human history, all for an urgent and necessary
cause—and achieving precisely nothing. [35]At the time, I worried that
the mass street movement risked being consumed by the sterile politics
of online; this is exactly what happened. Now, even that vague cultural
halo is spent. Whatever wokeness was, as of 2022 its so utterly burned
out as a cultural force that anyone still grousing about it 24/7 is a
guaranteed hack. More recently, theres been worry about the rise of
the [36]new right—a oozingly digitised political current whose
effective proposition is that people should welcome a total
dictatorship to prevent corporations posting rainbow flags on the
internet. You can guess what I think of its prospects.
5. That this is the word
Things will survive in proportion to how well theyve managed to
insulate themselves from the internet and its demands. The Financial
Times will outlive the Guardian. Paintings will outlive NFTs. Print
magazines will outlive Substack. You will, if you play your cards
right, outlive me. If anything interesting ever happens again, it will
not be online. You will not get it delivered to your inbox. It will not
have a podcast. This machine has never produced anything of note, and
it never will.
A sword is against the internet, against those who live online, and
against its officials and wise men. A sword is against its false
prophets, and they will become fools. A sword is against its
commentators, and they will be filled with exhaustion. A sword is
against its trends and fashions and against all the posturers in its
midst, and they will become out of touch. A sword is against its
cryptocoins, and they will be worthless. A drought is upon its waters,
and they will be dried up. For it is a place of graven images, and the
people go mad over idols. So the desert creatures and hyenas will live
there and ostriches will dwell there. The bots will chatter at its
threshold, and dead links will litter the river bed. It will never
again be inhabited or lived in from generation to generation.
A conclusion, or, where Im going with all this
I am aware that Im writing this on the internet.
Whatever it is Im doing here, you should not be part of it. Do not
click the button below this paragraph, do not type in your email
address to receive new posts straight to your inbox, and for the love
of God, if you have any self-respect, do not even think about giving me
any money. There is still time for you to do something else. You can
still unchain yourself from this world that will soon, very soon, mean
absolutely nothing.
____________________
(BUTTON) Subscribe
As far as I can tell, Substack mostly functions as a kind of
meta-discourse for Twitter. (At least, this is the part Ive seen—there
are also, apparently, recipes.) Graham Linehan posts fifty times a day
on this platform, and all of it is just replying to tweets. This does
not strike me as particularly sustainable. I have no idea what kind of
demented pervert is actually reading this stuff, when you could be
lying in a meadow by a glassy stream, rien faire comme une bête, eyes
melting into the sky. According to the very helpful Substack employees
Ive spoken to, there are a set of handy best practices for this
particular region of the machine: have regular open threads, chitchat
with your subscribers, post humanising updates about your life. Form a
community. Im told that the most successful writing on here is
friendly, frequent, and fast. Apparently, readers should know exactly
what youre getting at within the first three sentences. I do not plan
on doing any of these things.
This is what I would like to do. I would like to see if, in the belly
of the dying internet, its possible to create something that is not
like the internet. I want to see if I can poke at the outlines of
whatever is coming next. In a previous life, I was a sort of mildly
infamous online opinion gremlin, best known for being extravagantly
mean about other opinion writers whose writing or whose opinions I
didnt like. These days, I find most of that stuff very, very dull. I
wonder if its possible to talk about things differently. Not
rationally or calmly, away from the cheap point-scoring of online
discourse—that would also be boring—but with a better, less sterile
kind of derangement. Im interested in the forms of writing that were
here long before the internet, and which will be here long after its
gone. Not thinkpieces or blogs, but the essay, the manifesto, the
satyr, and the screed. Ludibria, pseudepigrapha, quodlibets. Or
folktales. Prophecy. Dreams.
[37]1
I am very disappointed that this scene never appears in Disneys Moana.
[38]2
Its the same thought that, in Marxs 1873 postface to Capital, Volume
I, includes in its positive understanding of what exists a
simultaneous recognition of its negation, its inevitable destruction.
Or Hegels famous line on the flight habits of nocturnal birds. Or
Baudrillard after the orgy, sticky and spent, announcing that the
revolution has already happened and the Messiah has already been and
gone.
[39]3
As a general rule: by the time you hear about any of this stuff, by the
time its in general discursive circulation, whatever was motive and
real in the phenomenon has already died. Every culture warrior spends
their life raging at the light of a very distant, long-exploded star.
[40]4
Every few weeks, there are ads for some new band plastered over the
Tube. The acid, whipsmart voice of twenty-first century youth! Then you
listen, and theyre just ripping off the Fall again. You think your
haircut is distinguished, when its a blot on the English landscape.
[41]5
Chances are, though, that it wont be remembered at all. Gregory of
Tours was a Roman aristocrat, the son of a Senator, raised on Virgil
and Sallust, but in his dense ten-volume History he never bothers to
even mention the collapse of the Western Roman Empire. The old imperial
world had ended so decisively that its passing wasnt even considered
particularly important; the new world of barbarian kings (governing
through a system of ecclesiastical administration inherited from the
empire, and that still functioned, if haphazardly, with only the most
nominal connections to central authority in Italy or the Bosporus) had
become the only possible world order, even as the cities shrank and
Mediterranean trade vanished. Syagrius, magister militum in the Roman
rump state around Noviodunum, becomes the King of the Romans; his
imperial holdout becomes the Kingdom of Soissons. It took several
centuries for people to decide that anything particularly significant
had happened when Odoacer overthrew the teenaged Romulus Augustulus in
476 AD. This is why the internet has not been a true revolution:
everyone online is still obsessing over how much has changed, and
fondly remembering the time before we all spent all our waking hours
staring at phones.
[42]6
Actually, I have two slightly overlapping theories on what might be
happening. The main one is above; the second, which is weirder and
makes less sense, has been shoved down here. Samuel Beckett describes a
version of the internet and its exhaustion, one made of small pebbles.
Here is Molloy on the beach, this limping old bird in his shabby
overcoat, rolling in the sand. Much of my life has ebbed away before
this shivering expanse, to the sound of waves in storm and calm, and
the claws of the surf. He has sixteen stones in his pocket, and every
so often he puts one in his mouth to suck on it for a while. A little
pebble in your mouth, round and smooth, appeases, soothes, makes you
forget your hunger, forget your thirst. The problem: how to make sure
that when he next reaches into his pocket, he doesnt take out the
stone hes just sucked? How to make sure hes getting the full
enjoyment out of each of his sixteen stones? Novelty is mysteriously
important, even though deep down it was all the same to me whether I
sucked a different stone each time or always the same stone, until the
end of time. For they all tasted exactly the same. For a while, his
coat and his trousers and his mouth are turned into a series of
machines for creating sequences of stones. Supply pockets and store
pockets, modes of circulation: curated algorithms, organising the world
and its information. Beckett spends half a dozen pages (in my edition)
describing these systems, as each of them arrives in a flash of divine
inspiration and fails in turn. Eventually, Molloy has exhausted every
possible arrangement of atoms and voids. The solution to which I
rallied in the end was to throw away all the stones but one, which I
kept now in one pocket, now in another, and which of course I soon
lost, or threw away, or gave away, or swallowed. It was a wild part of
the coast. In The Exhausted, his grand study of Beckett, Deleuze
comments on the distinction between the exhausted and the merely tired.
The tired has only exhausted realisation, while the exhausted exhausts
all of the possible. To exhaust the world as it is you only need to
experience it: wander through reality, and get bored. But for true
exhaustion, you need to know that everything that could be is as empty
as everything that is. To reach exhaustion, you need some kind of
device, made of tables and programmes, a technics. Something like
Molloys overcoat. The combinatorial is the art or science of
exhausting the possible, through inclusive disjunctions. The ars
combinatoria is also the system of formal logic, revealed in holy
visions to Ramon Llull in his cave on Puig de Ronda in 1274, eventually
refined by Gottfried Leibniz, that powers the device youre using to
read this now. Exhaustion is the mode of life integral to a
computerised society; the internet comes to us already long worn out,
combining and recombining stale elements, shambling through the dead
zones of itself.
[43]7
You could compare this process to Marxs law of the tendency of the
rate of profit to fall: as each individual actor, follows its
incentives and inflates the organic composition, the entire system ends
up stumbling into crisis.
[44]8
People claim to be deeply worried by this stuff, but I think you
secretly like it. You like the idea that your attention is what creates
the world. You like the idea that the entire global economy is
predicated on getting to know you, finding out what you like and
dislike, your taste in music and your frankly insane political opinions
and the gooey little treats you buy. Global capitalism as one vast
Buzzfeed personality quiz. The faceless empire of yourself.
[45]9
One of the largest shareholders in Twitter is the Kingdom Holding
Company, chaired by Prince al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdulaziz al-Saud.
For some reason, people seemed to think that replacing him with Elon
Musk would shift the tenor of the site to the right.
[46]10
When I was younger, my brother and I had a running joke about a lemon
that could connect to the internet. Not for any particular reason: a
light would blink just below the lemons skin, and it would do nothing,
just slowly rot in your fruitbowl. A few years ago, that lemon would
have immediately secured half a billion dollars in first-round funding.
Now, not so much.
[47]11
The cancelled always participate in the theatre of their own
cancellation. In Greco-Roman sacrifices, the animal was expected to nod
before being led to the altar; the victim had to consent to its
slaughter. And that nod always happened, even if a priest had to induce
it by pouring a vase of water over the animals head.
Share
Next
Top
New
No posts
Ready for more?
____________________
(BUTTON) Subscribe
© 2023 Sam Kriss
[48]Privacy ∙ [49]Terms ∙ [50]Collection notice
Start Writing[51]Get the app
[52]Substack is the home for great writing
This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please [53]turn on
JavaScript or unblock scripts
References
Visible links:
1. file:///feed
2. https://samkriss.substack.com/
3. https://samkriss.substack.com/
4. https://substack.com/@samkriss
5. https://www.thecut.com/2022/02/a-vibe-shift-is-coming.html
6. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-1-71503638
7. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-2-71503638
8. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-3-71503638
9. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-4-71503638
10. https://damagemag.com/2022/04/21/the-internet-is-made-of-demons/
11. https://onlyfans.com/
12. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-5-71503638
13. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/aug/21/its-a-modern-day-facebook-how-bereal-became-gen-zs-favourite-app
14. https://www.rivaliq.com/blog/social-engagement-benchmark-trends-2020/
15. https://www.vox.com/recode/2022/2/2/22915110/facebook-meta-user-growth-decline-first-time-metaverse-mark-zuckerberg-tiktok-competition-earnings
16. https://www.digitalinformationworld.com/2022/03/this-new-report-reveals-surprising.html
17. https://www.insiderintelligence.com/content/time-spent-tiktok-decline
18. https://forum.agoraroad.com/index.php?threads/dead-internet-theory-most-of-the-internet-is-fake.3011/
19. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-6-71503638
20. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-7-71503638
21. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/say-goodbye-millennial-urban-lifestyle/599839/
22. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.IND.MANF.ZS
23. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-01/trillions-of-negative-yielding-debt-redeem-europe-s-bond-bulls
24. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-8-71503638
25. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-9-71503638
26. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-10-71503638
27. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-12/softbank-vision-fund-posts-a-record-loss-as-son-s-bets-fail
28. https://www.idler.co.uk/article/adam-curtis-social-media-is-a-scam/
29. https://marketinginsidergroup.com/marketing-strategy/digital-ads-dont-work-and-everyone-knows-it/
30. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/pdf/10.1287/mksc.2019.1188
31. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v44/n09/donald-mackenzie/blink-bid-buy
32. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/05/social-media-democracy-trust-babel/629369/
33. https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/3632191-the-dark-brandon-rises/
34. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-11-71503638
35. https://samkriss.com/2020/06/10/white-skin-black-squares/
36. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/04/inside-the-new-right-where-peter-thiel-is-placing-his-biggest-bets
37. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-1-71503638
38. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-2-71503638
39. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-3-71503638
40. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-4-71503638
41. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-5-71503638
42. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-6-71503638
43. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-7-71503638
44. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-8-71503638
45. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-9-71503638
46. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-10-71503638
47. https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-internet-is-already-over#footnote-anchor-11-71503638
48. https://samkriss.substack.com/privacy?utm_source=
49. https://substack.com/tos
50. https://substack.com/ccpa#personal-data-collected
51. https://substack.com/app/app-store-redirect?utm_campaign=app-marketing&utm_content=web-footer-button
52. https://substack.com/
53. https://enable-javascript.com/
Hidden links:
55. https://substack.com/profile/14289667-sam-kriss
56. javascript:void(0)
57. https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F19221e8d-a9aa-4143-b9a6-1e6f951faa44_1368x1156.png
58. https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa51b61a9-059d-45ed-8104-eaa81b678cd5_1536x1099.jpeg
59. https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd3debefc-91c1-4a45-8509-fa16b752a687_1100x781.jpeg
60. javascript:void(0)
61. https://substack.com/signup?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_content=footer

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,556 @@
#[1]home
[2]Search
__________________________________________________________________
* [3]Today in Gear
* [4]Today's Best Deals
+ [5]Grill Deals
+ [6]Patio Furniture Deals
+ [7]Fitness Deals
+ [8]Style Deals
+ [9]Mattress Deals
+ [10]Outdoor Gear Deals
+ [11]Furniture Sales
* [12]Gift Ideas
* [13]Gear Awards
+ [14]The 2023 Home Awards
+ [15]The 2023 Cannabis Awards
+ [16]The 2023 Fitness Awards
+ [17]The 2023 Outdoor Awards
+ [18]The 2022 GP100
* [19]Buying Guides
+ [20]Watch Buying Guides
+ [21]Drink Buying Guides
+ [22]Home Buying Guides
+ [23]Tech Buying Guides
+ [24]Car and Motorcycle Guides
+ [25]Fitness Buying Guides
+ [26]Style and Grooming Guides
+ [27]Outdoor Buying Guides
* [28]Reviews
+ [29]Deep Dive
+ [30]Kind of Obsessed
+ [31]Head to Head
* [32]How-Tos and Explainers
+ [33]Counterpoint
+ [34]Further Details
+ [35]Product Support
* [36]Watches
+ [37]Watches You Should Know
+ [38]Dive Watches
+ [39]Dress Watches
+ [40]Vintage Watches
+ [41]Tool Watches
+ [42]Watch Accessories
* [43]Motoring
+ [44]Motorcycles
+ [45]Classic Cars
+ [46]SUVs and Trucks
+ [47]Adventure Vehicles
+ [48]Electric Vehicles
* [49]Food and Drink
+ [50]Whiskey
+ [51]Cocktails
+ [52]Beer
+ [53]Coffee
* [54]Home
+ [55]Kitchenware
+ [56]Office
+ [57]Weed
* [58]Style
+ [59]Grooming
+ [60]Style Spotting
+ [61]Bags and Luggage
+ [62]Style Accessories
* [63]Tech
+ [64]Audio
+ [65]Computers and Laptops
+ [66]Cameras and Photography
+ [67]Televisions
+ [68]Smartphones
* [69]Outdoors
+ [70]Knives and Multitools
+ [71]Camping
+ [72]Hiking and Climbing
+ [73]Skiing and Snowboarding
* [74]Fitness
+ [75]Wellness
+ [76]Training and Recovery
+ [77]Running
+ [78]Cycling
* [79]Follow
+ [80]Instagram
+ [81]Facebook
+ [82]Twitter
+ [83]YouTube
+ [84]Flipboard
* [85]Newsletter
* [86]Gear Patrol Magazine
* [87]Gear Patrol Studios
* [88]Videos
* [89]Library of Pursuits
* [90]About Gear Patrol
* [91]Advertise with Us
* [92]Your Privacy Choices
[93]Privacy Notice/Notice at Collection [94]Terms of Use
* [95]Today in Gear
* [96]Reviews
* [97]Buying Guides
* [98]Deals
* [99]Studios
[100]Magazine
____________________ Type keyword(s) to search
Every product is [101]carefully selected by our editors. If you buy
from a link, [102]we may earn a commission.
tascam portastudio 414 mk 2 on a desk
Eric Limer
1. [103]Tech
[104]Audio
[105]This Four-Track Tape Recorder Made Me Fall In Love With Music
All Over Again
This Four-Track Tape Recorder Made Me Fall In Love With Music All Over Again
The cassette is still cool.
By [106]Eric Limer
Oct 11, 2023
For the past ten years or so I've been a musical rut, playing the same
half-dozen, half-written songs on guitar once every other blue moon and
listening to the same handful of punk bands I listened to in high
school. Ive been a musician for most of my life. Between church
choirs, garage bands, and a cappella groups, Ive been involved in
organized (but never professional) music-making for the better part of
several decades. But, after so long uninspired, I thought that maybe
the musical part of my life was mostly behind me. Until the [107]Tascam
Portastudio 414 MKII brought it all flooding back.
* Tascam Portastudio 414 MKII 4-Track Cassette Recorder
[108]$475 AT REVERB.COM
[109]Read More
[110]$475 AT REVERB.COM
Released at the tail end of the 90s, the Portastudio 414 MKII harkens
back to a time before MacBooks shipped with Garageband. If you wanted
to record music with multiple tracks that could be altered
independently, you were looking at booking studio time or buying
something like this lovely big blue beast. And make no mistake, this
chunky boy can deliver if you've got the chops. Bruce Springsteen's
Nebraska, a few early Ween records, and some vintage Weird Al tunes
[111]were all recorded on a Portastudio of one make or another. More
recently, Nine Inch Nails' Alessandro Cortini has been almost single
handedly responsible for making the 414 MKII in particular cool again
with [112]his unorthodox (and extremely sick) use of the device as an
instrument in live performance.
Eric Limer
Tascam Portastudio 414 MKII 4-Track Cassette Recorder
reverb.com
$475.00
[113]SHOP NOW
The 414 MK II lets you record four independent tracks to a humble
cassette tape, just enough room for bass, guitar, vocals, and drums,
with the ability to add more if youve got the nerve to "bounce down"
multiple instruments to the same track, irrevocably intertwining two
rivers of sound to free up a slot for additional recording. Its
ridiculously limited compared to the "digital audio workstations" you
can get literally for free today. but it does come with one killer
feature that has only truly emerged in the millennium following its
original launch: You dont have to stare at a fucking screen to use it.
close up of leds
Much like celluloid photographic film, magnetic tape handles peaking
more gracefully than digital mediums.
Eric Limer
a close up of a play button
Theres nothing quite so satisfying is pressing play and feeling the
tape start to move.
Eric Limer
I only ever recorded one (very poorly performed) song with my
Portastudio when my parents gifted it to me back in the mid-aughts, and
for almost twenty years I hadnt really thought about it at all. But
when an album cover featuring its unmistakable visage cropped up on my
Spotify, it lit a spark in my brain. Mom knew just the closet where it
had spent a decade plus hiding and soon, with a package of fresh
cassette tapes in hand, I was ready to hit record.
a stack of cassette tapes
The Portastudio is designed to use pricey "Type II" cassette tapes for
optimal performance, but cheaper Type 1s work fine (or better, if you
actually want that telltale hiss).
Eric Limer
The joy of working in an analog medium, as [114]lovers of film
photography can attest, is both the friction and the flavor it brings.
Light leaks can spice up an otherwise average photograph. A little tape
hiss can give your jam that extra flair. The cost, of course, is that
your mistakes get baked all the way in, for better or worse. No undo
buttons here. You have to move slowly and skillfully to find success.
And so my plan to record guitar, bass, and vocals quickly hit a
not-insignificant snag: I am neither a particularly good recording
artist nor a remotely competent audio engineer.
After a few hours of trying and failing to adequately record the
beat-to-shit [115]Yamaha FG-335II I stole from my dad on my way to
college 16 years ago with a unidirectional dynamic mic not remotely fit
for the task, I tripped and fell into a whole other rabbit hole. What
you really need, the gear gremlin between my ears sweetly whispered, is
a drum machine. Also a synthesizer.
A bit of research and a few impulse buys later, I was finally in
business:
This content is imported from Third party. You may be able to find the
same content in another format, or you may be able to find more
information, at their web site.
Featured in this track:
Korg Volca Keys
Korg Volca Keys
Korg amazon.com
$237.00
$147.99 (38% off)
[116]SHOP NOW
Arguably the cornerstone of Korg's budget "Volca" line, the Volca Keys
has old-school analog circuitry, basic sequencer functionality and
limited polyphony so you can play chords. It's also optionally
battery-powered and I've spent dozens of hours jamming on it while
sitting on the couch. Oh also it sounds fat as hell.
Korg NTS Digital Synth Kit 1
Korg NTS Digital Synth Kit 1
Korg amazon.com
$95.00
[117]SHOP NOW
You have to assemble this tiny, digital synth yourself, but it packs a
ton of functionality into an itty bitty and affordable package. It
supports [118]a library of community-programmed instrument sounds and
effects and doubles as a capable FX pedal for my other gear thanks to
its passthrough reverb, chorus and modulation effects.
Arturia KeyStep 32-Key Controller
Arturia KeyStep 32-Key Controller
Arturia amazon.com
$149.00
$129.00 (13% off)
[119]SHOP NOW
My Korgs all sport touchpad keyboards that are... technically
functional. If you want any sort of precision, an external MIDI
keyboard is essential. Arturia's KeyStep is a go-to choice that sports
some useful features of its own, like a sequencer for recording complex
patterns and an arpeggiator for auto-playing simpler ones.
Korg Volca Sample 2 Korg Volca Sample 2
Korg guitarcenter.com
$109.99
[120]SHOP NOW
It's not a drum machine, but I used it as one because it comes
preloaded with a number of drum recordings (and other sound clips) and
the ability to load your own. It served me well enough, but I'm putting
this one back on the market because I've made it redundant with some
other buys and I've learned that I much prefer synthesis to sampling.
Like any amateur analog artifact, this track contains mistakes encased
in amber. The hi-hats are too hot because I didnt balance the levels
of the individual drums in my sampler before committing the whole drum
track to tape. The bass comes in awkwardly because I was doing dynamics
live to tape with the synth's volume knob instead of using a fader
during mixdown. The solo, well, it is what it is. But the Portastudio
saved my ass, not (only) with tape hiss, but by helping me take a deep
breath and put this song to bed. I wont waste hours trying to improve
on the raw material with endless tiny tweaks, because I can't. Lessons
(hopefully) learned, on to the next jam!
a piano with a keyboard
Controlled over MIDI by the Arturia KeyStep, the Volca Keys outputs its
audio through the NTS-1 for reverb before heading into track one on the
Portastudio.
Eric Limer
In the months since that inaugural recording, the road of my obsession
has taken me away from analog, and towards digital devices that can
synthesize and sequence a songs worth of instruments inside themselves
(still no computer screens allowed). At the moment, Im in love with my
[121]"Woovebox," a petite-but-powerful one-person labor of love out of
Australia, while I simultaneously lust after [122]the wickedly slick,
murdered-out Dirtywave M8 Tracker, a Gameboy-sized studio in a
handheld.
If the two of us didn't go so far back, I might consider flipping my
Portastudio on the secondary market, where the prices are currently
sky-high. I could probably get more for it now than my parents
originally paid and finance a big chunk of this or that digital
dalliance. But in a way, I'm glad to be spared the temptation. Because
if there's anything I've learned over the past twenty-something years,
it's that the odds are very high I'll come crawling back to cassette.
* Tascam Portastudio 414 MKII 4-Track Cassette Recorder
[123]$475 AT REVERB.COM
[124]Read More
[125]$475 AT REVERB.COM
Related Stories
The Best Vintage Cassette Tape Players
The Comeback of the Classic Cassette
(BUTTON)
More From [126]Audio
The Best Dolby Atmos Soundbars of 2023
These Turntable and Speaker Combos Make Vinyl Easy
__________________________________________________________________
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
The Best Accessories for Your Sonos Speakers
__________________________________________________________________
6 Tricks All Sonos Owners Should Know
__________________________________________________________________
How to Play Vinyl Records on Your Sonos Speakers
AirPods Pro Dont Fit Your Ears? Get These
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
The Best Cheap Wireless Earbuds (All Under $100)
The New Sony WF-1000XM5 Are Elite Wireless Earbuds
__________________________________________________________________
Update Your AirPods and Get More Features
__________________________________________________________________
Your AirPods Pro Just Got Way Better — Here's How
__________________________________________________________________
* [127]About Us
* [128]Today in Gear
* [129]Deals
* [130]Gift Guides
* [131]DPReview
* [132]Watches
* [133]Motoring
* [134]Style
* [135]Outdoors
* [136]Fitness
* [137]Food and Drink
* [138]Home
* [139]Tech
* [140]Gear Patrol Magazine
* [141]Newsletters
* [142]Gear Patrol Studios
* [143]How We Test Products
* [144]Advertise
* [145]Licensing and Accolades
* [146]RSS
Gear Patrol For Life's Pursuits Gear Patrol participates in various
affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions
on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer
sites.
©2023 Gear Patrol, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
* [147]Privacy Notice
* [148]CA Notice at Collection
* [149]Your CA Privacy Rights/Shine the Light
* [150]DAA Industry Opt Out
* [151]Terms Of Use
* [152]Sitemap
[153]Your Privacy Choices: Opt Out of Sale/Targeted Ads
References
Visible links:
1. file:///
2. file:///var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L75009-3138TMP.html#searchoverlay
3. file:///briefings/today-in-gear/
4. https://www.gearpatrol.com/deals/a34849668/best-deals/
5. https://www.gearpatrol.com/deals/a35785047/best-grills-on-sale/
6. https://www.gearpatrol.com/deals/a35730687/patio-furniture-sales/
7. file:///deals/a37854345/best-fitness-gear-deals/
8. https://www.gearpatrol.com/deals/a34847479/mens-clothing-sale/
9. https://www.gearpatrol.com/deals/a655645/best-mattress-deals/
10. https://www.gearpatrol.com/deals/a35854645/best-outdoor-gear-deals/
11. https://www.gearpatrol.com/deals/a37867872/furniture-sale/
12. https://www.gearpatrol.com/gift-guides/
13. https://www.gearpatrol.com/gear-awards/
14. https://www.gearpatrol.com/home/a43576931/home-awards-2023/
15. https://www.gearpatrol.com/home/a43496144/cannabis-awards-2023/
16. https://www.gearpatrol.com/fitness/a42254287/fitness-awards-2023/
17. https://www.gearpatrol.com/outdoors/a44116782/outdoor-awards-2023/
18. https://www.gearpatrol.com/briefings/a41917334/2022-gp100-best-products-of-the-year/
19. file:///buying-guides/
20. file:///watch-buying-guides/
21. file:///drink-buying-guides/
22. file:///home-buying-guides/
23. file:///tech-buying-guides/
24. file:///car-motorcycle-buying-guides/
25. file:///fitness-buying-guides/
26. file:///style-buying-guides/
27. file:///outdoor-buying-guides/
28. file:///reviews/
29. file:///deep-dive/
30. file:///kind-of-obsessed/
31. file:///head-to-head-reviews/
32. file:///how-tos-explainers/
33. file:///counterpoint/
34. file:///further-details/
35. file:///product-support/
36. file:///watches/
37. file:///watches-you-should-know/
38. file:///dive-watches/
39. file:///dress-watches/
40. file:///vintage-watches/
41. file:///tool-watches/
42. file:///watch-accessories/
43. file:///cars/
44. file:///cars/motorcycles/
45. file:///classic-cars/
46. file:///suvs-trucks/
47. file:///adventure-vehicles/
48. file:///electric-vehicles/
49. file:///food/
50. file:///whiskey/
51. file:///cocktails/
52. file:///beer/
53. file:///coffee/
54. file:///home/
55. file:///kitchenware/
56. file:///office/
57. file:///weed/
58. file:///style/
59. file:///style/grooming/
60. file:///style-spotting/
61. file:///bags-luggage/
62. file:///style-accessories/
63. file:///tech/
64. file:///tech/audio/
65. file:///computers-laptops/
66. file:///cameras-photography/
67. file:///televisions/
68. file:///smartphones/
69. file:///outdoors/
70. file:///knives-multitools/
71. file:///camping/
72. file:///hiking-climbing/
73. file:///skiing-snowboarding/
74. file:///fitness/
75. file:///fitness/health-wellness/
76. file:///training-recovery/
77. file:///running/
78. file:///biking/
79. file:///about/
80. https://www.instagram.com/gearpatrol/
81. https://www.facebook.com/gearpatrol
82. https://twitter.com/gearpatrol
83. https://www.youtube.com/user/gearpatrol
84. https://flipboard.com/@GearPatrol
85. https://email.gearpatrol.com/subscribe
86. https://www.gearpatrol.com/about/a40849193/about-gear-patrol-magazine/
87. https://studios.gearpatrol.com/
88. file:///videos/
89. https://email.gearpatrol.com/library-of-pursuits
90. https://www.gearpatrol.com/about/a2281/about/
91. https://studios.gearpatrol.com/contact/
92. file:///about/a42158740/do-not-sell-my-personal-information/
93. https://www.hearst.com/-/us-magazines-privacy-notice
94. https://www.hearst.com/-/us-magazines-terms-of-use
95. file:///today-in-gear
96. file:///reviews/
97. file:///buying-guides
98. file:///deals/
99. https://studios.gearpatrol.com/
100. https://store.gearpatrol.com/collections/gear-patrol-magazine-issue-twenty/products/gear-patrol-magazine-subscription
101. https://www.gearpatrol.com/about/a43276360/how-we-evaluate-products/
102. https://www.gearpatrol.com/about/a2281/about/#:~:text=Affiliate Disclosure Statement,price as a referral fee.
103. https://www.gearpatrol.com/tech/
104. https://www.gearpatrol.com/tech/audio/
105. https://www.gearpatrol.com/tech/audio/a45461959/tascam-portastudio-414-mkii/
106. file:///author/225861/eric-limer/
107. https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=31959X896062&xs=1&url=https://reverb.com/p/tascam-414-mkii&sref=https://www.gearpatrol.com/tech/audio/a45461959/tascam-portastudio-414-mkii/
108. https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=31959X896062&url=https://reverb.com/marketplace?product_type=pro-audio&query=TASCAM+Portastudio+414+MKII+4-Track+Cassette+Recorder
109. file:///var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L75009-3138TMP.html#product-1018365f-aed1-4bbd-86ea-466ab005acb7-anchor
110. https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=31959X896062&url=https://reverb.com/marketplace?product_type=pro-audio&query=TASCAM+Portastudio+414+MKII+4-Track+Cassette+Recorder
111. https://mixdownmag.com.au/features/the-10-best-recordings-on-the-iconic-tascam-portastudio/
112. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11BP4Pe8iYk
113. https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=31959X896062&url=https://reverb.com/marketplace?product_type=pro-audio&query=TASCAM+Portastudio+414+MKII+4-Track+Cassette+Recorder
114. https://www.gearpatrol.com/tech/a43946858/formula-1-film-photography-tips/
115. https://terrifyingtonetrip.wordpress.com/2013/11/07/guitarsenal-early-80s-yamaha-fg335ii-acoustic/
116. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00CAKSVTU
117. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07XH591BH
118. https://korginc.github.io/logue-sdk/unit-index/
119. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01BPSBU40
120. https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=31959X896062&url=https://www.guitarcenter.com/KORG/Volca-Sample-2-Digital-Sample-Sequencer-White-1500000332703.gc
121. https://www.woovebox.com/
122. https://dirtywave.com/
123. https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=31959X896062&url=https://reverb.com/marketplace?product_type=pro-audio&query=TASCAM+Portastudio+414+MKII+4-Track+Cassette+Recorder
124. file:///var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L75009-3138TMP.html#product-1018365f-aed1-4bbd-86ea-466ab005acb7-anchor
125. https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=31959X896062&url=https://reverb.com/marketplace?product_type=pro-audio&query=TASCAM+Portastudio+414+MKII+4-Track+Cassette+Recorder
126. file:///tech/audio/
127. file:///about/a2281/about/
128. file:///briefings/today-in-gear/
129. file:///deals/
130. file:///gift-guides/
131. https://www.dpreview.com/
132. file:///watches/
133. file:///cars/
134. file:///style/
135. file:///outdoors/
136. file:///fitness/
137. file:///food/
138. file:///home/
139. file:///tech/
140. file:///about/a40849193/about-gear-patrol-magazine/
141. https://email.gearpatrol.com/subscribe
142. https://studios.gearpatrol.com/
143. file:///about/a43276360/how-we-evaluate-products/
144. https://studios.gearpatrol.com/contact/
145. https://info.wrightsmedia.com/gearpatrol-licensing-reprints
146. file:///rss/all.xml/
147. https://www.hearst.com/-/us-magazines-privacy-notice
148. https://www.hearst.com/-/us-magazines-privacy-notice#_ADDITIONAL_INFO
149. https://www.hearst.com/-/us-magazines-privacy-notice#_ADDITIONAL_INFO
150. https://www.hearst.com/-/us-magazines-privacy-notice#_OPT_OUTS
151. https://www.hearst.com/-/us-magazines-terms-of-use
152. file:///sitemap/
153. file:///about/a42158740/do-not-sell-my-personal-information/
Hidden links:
155. file://localhost/var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L75009-3138TMP.html
156. file://localhost/var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L75009-3138TMP.html
157. file://localhost/var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L75009-3138TMP.html#sidepanel
158. file://localhost/
159. file://localhost/var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L75009-3138TMP.html
160. https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=31959X896062&url=https%3A%2F%2Freverb.com%2Fmarketplace%3Fproduct_type%3Dpro-audio%26query%3DTASCAM+Portastudio+414+MKII+4-Track+Cassette+Recorder
161. https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=31959X896062&url=https%3A%2F%2Freverb.com%2Fmarketplace%3Fproduct_type%3Dpro-audio%26query%3DTASCAM+Portastudio+414+MKII+4-Track+Cassette+Recorder
162. https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=31959X896062&url=https%3A%2F%2Freverb.com%2Fmarketplace%3Fproduct_type%3Dpro-audio%26query%3DTASCAM+Portastudio+414+MKII+4-Track+Cassette+Recorder
163. file://localhost/tech/audio/a41601961/vintage-cassette-player/
164. file://localhost/tech/a36356719/cassette-tape-player-revival/
165. file://localhost/tech/audio/a44446015/best-atmos-soundbars/
166. file://localhost/tech/audio/a553650/best-vinyl-setups/
167. file://localhost/tech/audio/a36511887/best-sonos-accessories/
168. file://localhost/tech/audio/a36792654/sonos-speaker-settings-to-change/
169. file://localhost/tech/audio/a36877979/how-to-connect-bluetooth-turntable-sonos-roam/
170. file://localhost/tech/audio/a726852/airpods-pro-comply-eartips/
171. file://localhost/tech/audio/a45549852/best-wireless-earbuds-under-100/
172. file://localhost/tech/audio/a44590793/sony-wf-1000xm5-wireless-earbuds-review/
173. file://localhost/tech/audio/a34056968/how-to-update-your-airpods-pro/
174. file://localhost/tech/audio/a45507522/airpods-pro-new-features/
175. file://localhost/
176. https://www.facebook.com/gearpatrol/
177. https://twitter.com/gearpatrol
178. https://www.youtube.com/gearpatrol
179. https://www.instagram.com/gearpatrol/

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,667 @@
#[1]alternate [2]Why Culture Has Come to a Standstill
The Magazines Culture Issue
* [3]Jesmyn Wards Literary South
* [4]The Heart of Swiftiedom
* [5]Culture at a Standstill
* [6]Can Usher Save R&B?
* [7]Sparring With Errol Morris
An illustration of various people all bunched together.
Credit...Illustration by Tim Enthoven
[8]Skip to content[9]Skip to site index
(BUTTON) Search & Section Navigation
(BUTTON) Section Navigation
Why Culture Has Come to a Standstill
A Times critic argues that ours is the least innovative century for the
arts in 500 years. That doesnt have to be a bad thing.
Credit...Illustration by Tim Enthoven
Supported by
[10]SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
* (BUTTON) Share full article
* (BUTTON)
* (BUTTON)
* [11]1240
[12]Jason Farago
By [13]Jason Farago
* Oct. 10, 2023
At the Metropolitan Museum of Art, in its fall blockbuster show,
[14]“Manet/Degas,” is a painting from 1866 of a woman in the latest
fashion. Victorine Meurent, Manets favorite model, stands in an empty
room, accompanied only by a parrot on a bird stand. Her trademark red
hair is tied back with a blue ribbon. Her head is slightly bowed as she
smells a nosegay in her right hand: probably a gift from an absent
admirer, just like the gentlemans monocle in her left. Shes wearing a
silk peignoir, which Manet has rendered in buttery strokes of pink and
white. This is a full-length image, more than six feet tall, but
Victorine hasnt even put on her best clothes. Shes in a dressing
gown, and the gown is amorphous. The gown is only paint.
Listen to This Article
Open this article in the New York Times Audio app on iOS.
Manet called this painting “Young Lady in 1866,” and the title is the
briefest manifesto I know. After ages in which artists aimed for
timelessness, Manet pictured a woman living in 1866, in the Paris of
1866, wearing clothes from 1866. The painting was a radical eruption of
temporal specificity. An art for this year, in this place, in a form
possible only now.
Image “Young Lady in 1866”
“Young Lady in 1866,” by Edouard Manet.Credit...Metropolitan Museum of
Art
Most artists and audiences at the time did not think this was such a
virtue. “Young Lady in 1866” got bad press at the Salon, the annual
exhibition of Frances official art academy, where artists aspired to
eternal beauty and eternal values, expressed through classicized motifs
and highly finished surfaces. Thomas Couture, Manets own teacher,
specialized in bloated but very technically proficient tableaux of
nymphs and heroes. Only a few Parisians could see, in the thick pallor
of Victorines face and the impetuous brushiness of her peignoir, the
mark of a new cultural dispensation. Baudelaire, Manets great friend,
articulated it in “The Flowers of Evil”:
O Death, old captain, its time! Lift anchor!
Were sick of this country, Death! Let us sail ...
To the depths of the Unknown to find something new!
To find something new! That was the imperative of modernism, not only
in painting but also in poetry, in theater, in music, in architecture
and eventually in the cinema. Your job as an artist was no longer to
glorify the king or the church, nor to imitate as faithfully as
possible the appearance of the outside world. It was to solder the next
link in a cultural chain — fashioning a novel utterance that took novel
shape even as it manifested its place in a larger history. “You have to
be absolutely modern,” Rimbaud declared; “Make it new,” Ezra Pound
instructed. To speak to your time, we once believed, required much more
than new “content.” It required a commitment to new modes of narration,
new styles of expression, that could bear witness to sea changes in
society.
Manet, classically trained, figured out quickly that if he painted
scenes of Parisian prostitutes in the same manner as his teacher
painted Roman orgiasts, that wouldnt cut it; he would have to invent a
new kind of painting — flatter, franker — if he wanted to capture
modern life. From then on, the creators who most decisively marked the
history of art, again and again, described their work as a search for a
new language, a new style, a new way of being. “I have transformed
myself in the zero of form,” Kazimir Malevich wrote in 1915, and in his
black square he found “the face of the new art.” Le Corbusier insisted
that his open floor plans, enabled by reinforced floating columns, were
not just an architectural aesthetic but an age: “Nothing is left to us
of the architecture of past epochs, just as we can no longer derive any
benefit from the literary and historical teaching given in schools.”
Aimé Césaire, who would revolutionize French poetry in the 20th century
as Baudelaire did in the 19th, understood that a modern Black
expression required “a new language, capable of expressing an African
heritage.” “In other words,” he said, “French was for me an instrument
that I wanted to twist into a new way of speaking.”
For 160 years, we spoke about culture as something active, something
with velocity, something in continuous forward motion. What happens to
a culture when it loses that velocity, or even slows to a halt? Walking
through the other galleries of the Met after my third visit to
“Manet/Degas,” I started doing that thing all the Salon visitors used
to do in Paris in 1866: ignoring the paintings and scoping out the
other spectators clothes. I saw visitors in the skinny jeans that
defined the 2000s and in the roomy, high-waisted jeans that were
popular in the 1990s; neither style looked particularly au courant or
dated. Manet was a fashion maven, and Id been marveling anew at the
gauzy white-striped gown with flared sleeves that Berthe Morisot wears
in [15]“The Balcony” to signal that she is a contemporary woman — that
she is alive right now. What piece of clothing or accessory could you
give a model to mark her as “Young Lady in 2023”? A titanium-cased
iPhone is all that comes to mind, and even that hasnt changed its
appearance much in a decade.
To audiences in the 20th century, novelty seemed to be a cultural
birthright. Susan Sontag could write in 1965, with breezy confidence,
that new styles of art, cinema, music and dance “succeed one another so
rapidly as to seem to give their audiences no breathing space to
prepare.” Today culture remains capable of endless production, but its
far less capable of change. Intellectual property has swallowed the
cinema; the Hollywood studios that once proposed a slate of big, medium
and small pictures have hedged their bets, and even independent
directors have stuck with narrative and visual techniques born in the
1960s. Have you tried to furnish an apartment lately? Whether you are
at Restoration Hardware or on Alibaba, what you are probably buying are
replicas of European antiques: “contemporary” designs first seen in
Milan in the 1970s or Weimar in the 1920s. Harry Styles is rocking in
the 80s; Silk Sonic is jamming in the 70s; somehow “Frasier” has been
revived and they barely had to update the wardrobes.
If the present state of culture feels directionless — it does to me,
and sussing out its direction is literally my job — that is principally
because we are still inculcated, so unconsciously we never even bother
to spell it out, in what the modernists believed: that good art is good
because it is innovative, and that an ambitious writer, composer,
director or choreographer should not make things too much like what
others have made before. But our culture has not been able to deliver
step changes for quite some time. When you walk through your local
museums modern wing, starting with Impressionism and following a
succession of avant-gardes through the development of Cubism, Dada,
Pop, minimalism, in the 1990s you arrive in a forest called “the
contemporary,” and after more than 30 years no path forward has been
revealed. On your drive home, you can turn on the decade-by-decade
stations of Sirius XM: the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s will each
sound distinct, but all the millennial nostalgia of the 2000s station
cannot disguise that “We Belong Together” and “Irreplaceable” do not
yet sound retro. When I was younger, I looked at cultural works as if
they were posts on a timeline, moving forward from Manet year by year.
Now I find myself adrift in an eddy of cultural signs, where everything
just floats, and I can only tell time on my phone.
Image
Credit...Illustration by Tim Enthoven
We are now almost a quarter of the way through what looks likely to go
down in history as the least innovative, least transformative, least
pioneering century for culture since the invention of the printing
press. There is new content, of course, so much content, and there are
new themes; there are new methods of production and distribution, more
diverse creators and more global audiences; there is more singing in
hip-hop and more sampling on pop tracks; there are TV detectives with
smartphones and lovers facing rising seas. Twenty-three years in,
though, shockingly few works of art in any medium — some albums, a
handful of novels and artworks and barely any plays or poems — have
been created that are unassimilable to the cultural and critical
standards that audiences accepted in 1999. To pay attention to culture
in 2023 is to be belted into some glacially slow Ferris wheel, cycling
through remakes and pastiches with nowhere to go but around. The
suspicion gnaws at me (does it gnaw at you?) that we live in a time and
place whose culture seems likely to be forgotten.
To any claim that cultural progress is “over,” there is an easy and not
inaccurate retort: Well, what about X? And sure enough, our time has
indeed brought forth wonderful, meaningful cultural endeavors. I find
the sculptures of [16]Nairy Baghramian, the [17]videos of Stan Douglas
and the [18]environments of Pierre Huyghe to be artistic achievements
of the highest caliber; I think [19]Ali Smith is writing novels of
tremendous immediacy; I believe [20]“Transit” and [21]“Drive My Car”
reaffirm the vitality of cinema; I love [22]South African amapiano and
[23]Korean soap operas and [24]Ukrainian electronic music. My own
cultural life is very rich, and this is not some rant that once
everyone was so creative and now theyre all poseurs. I am asking a
different and peskier question: why cultural production no longer
progresses in time as it once did.
I have a few theories, but one to start with is that the modernist
cultural explosion might very well have been like the growth of the
economy more generally: not the perpetual forward march we were
promised in the 20th century, but a one-time-only rocket blast followed
by a long, slow, disappointing glide. As the economist Robert Gordon
has shown, the transformative growth of the period between 1870 and
1970 — the “special century,” he calls it — was an anomalous superevent
fueled by unique and unrepeatable innovations (electricity, sanitation,
the combustion engine) whose successors (above all information
technology) have not had the same economic impact. In the United
States, the 2010s had the slowest productivity growth of any decade in
recorded history; if you believe you are living in the future, I am
guessing you have not recently been on United Airlines. In this
macroeconomic reading, a culture that no longer delivers expected
stylistic innovations might just be part and parcel of a more generally
underachieving century, and not to be tutted at in isolation.
But more than the economics, the key factor can only be what happened
to us at the start of this century: first, the plunge through our
screens into an infinity of information; soon after, our submission to
algorithmic recommendation engines and the surveillance that powers
them. The digital tools we embraced were heralded as catalysts of
cultural progress, but they produced such chronological confusion that
progress itself made no sense. “Its still one Earth,” the novelist
Stacey DErasmo wrote in 2014, “but it is now subtended by a layer of
highly elastic non-time, wild time, that is akin to a global collective
unconscious wherein past, present and future occupy one unmediated
plane.” In this dark wood, today and yesterday become hard to
distinguish. The years are only time stamps. Objects lose their
dimensions. Everything is recorded, nothing is remembered; culture is a
thing to nibble at, to graze on.
If there is one cultural work that epitomizes this shift, where you can
see our new epoch coming into view, I want to say its [25]“Back to
Black,” by Amy Winehouse. The album dates to October 2006 — seven
months after Twitter was founded, three months before the iPhone
debuted — and it seems, listening again now, to be closing the door on
the cultural system that Manet and Baudelaire established a century and
a half previously. As the millennium dawned, there had been various
efforts to write the symphony of the future (the last of which was
probably Missy Elliotts “Da Real World,” a “Matrix”-inspired album
from 1999 that promised to sound like “not the year 2G but the year
3G”). There had also been various retroprojections, trying to
inaugurate a new century with pre-Woodstock throwbacks (waxed
mustaches, speakeasies; perhaps you recall an embarrassing circa-2000
vogue for swing dancing).
Image
Amy Winehouse at the Highline Ballroom in New York in
2007.Credit...Michael Nagle for The New York Times
“Back to Black” was the first major cultural work of the 21st century
that was neither new nor retro — but rather contented itself to float
in time, to sound as if it came from no particular era. Winehouse wore
her hair in a beehive, her band wore fedoras, but she was not
performing a tribute act of any kind. Her production drew from the
Great American Songbook, 60s girl groups, also reggae and ska, but it
never felt anachronistic or like a “postmodern” pastiche. Listen again
to the title track and its percussive piano line: a stationary,
metronomic cycle of D minor, G minor, B-flat major, and A7. The bass
line of the piano overlays the chords with a syncopated swing, while a
tambourine slaps and jangles with joyless regularity. We are back to
Phil Spectors Wall of Sound, we are waiting for the Shangri-Las or the
Ronettes to come in, but instead Winehouse delivers a much more ragged
and minor-keyed performance, with a vulgarity in the songs second line
that Martha Reeves would never pronounce. There is a discrepancy
between vocals and instrumentation that is never resolved, and the
artistry is all in that irresolution.
Who cares if its novel as long as its beautiful, or meaningful?
What Winehouse prefigured was a culture of an eternal present: a
digitally informed sense of placelessness and atemporality that has
left so many of us disoriented from our earlier cultural signposts.
Each song on “Back to Black” seemed to be “borrowing from all the last
centurys music history at once,” as the media scholar Moira Weigel
once observed, though there was something contemporary about that
timelessness too. Extracted from the past into lightweight MP3s, all
the girl-group and jazz prefigurations began to seem just as immediate
as Winehouses North London present.
As early as 2006, well before the reverse chronology of blogs and the
early Facebook gave way to the algorithmic soup of Instagram, Spotify
and TikTok, Winehouse sensed that the real digital revolution in
culture would not be in production, in the machines that artists used
to make music or movies or books. It would be in reception: on the
screens where they (where we) encountered culture, on which past and
present are equidistant from each other. One upshot of this digital
equation of past and present has been a greater disposability of
culture: an infinite scroll and nothing to read, an infinite Netflix
library with nothing to watch. Though pop music still throws up new
stars now and then (I do really like [26]Ice Spice), the market for new
music fell behind older music in the middle of the last decade, and
even the records that sell, or stream, cannot be said to have wide
cultural impact. (The most popular single of 2022 in the United States
was [27]“Heat Waves,” a TikTok tune by a British alternative-pop group
with little public profile called Glass Animals; and whats weirdest is
that it was recorded in 2020.)
Outside of time there can be no progress, only the perpetual trying-on
of styles and forms. Here years become vibes — or “eras,” as Taylor
Swift likes to call them. And if culture is just a series of trends,
then it is pointless to worry about their contemporaneity. There was a
charming freakout last year when Kate Bushs 1985 single “Running Up
That Hill” went to the top of the charts after its deployment on yet
another nostalgic television show, and veterans of the big-hair decade
were horrified to see it appear on some 2022 playlists alongside Dua
Lipa and the like. If you think the song belongs to 1985 in the way
“Young Lady in 1866” belonged to 1866, the joke is now officially on
you.
Down at the baseline where cultural innovation used to happen, in the
forms that artists once put together to show us something new — in the
sounds of the recording studio, the shapes on the canvas, the movements
of the dancers, the arrangements of the verse — something has stopped,
or at least slowed to such a lethargic pace as to feel stopped. Such a
claim may sound familiar if you were around for the postmodernism
debates of the 1980s. The philosopher Arthur Danto averred that art
ended with Andy Warhols Brillo Boxes, while the literary critic
Fredric Jameson declared in 1984 that the whole of modernity was “spent
and exhausted,” that there was no more style, indeed no more self, and
that “the producers of culture have nowhere to turn but to the past:
the imitation of dead styles.” As for the influence of digital media,
as early as 1989 the cultural theorist Paul Virilio identified a “polar
inertia” — a static pileup of images and words with no particular place
to go — as the inevitable endpoint for culture on a “weightless planet”
constituted of ones and zeros.
And yet looking back now, the “postmodern” turn of the later 20th
century looks much more like a continuation of the modernist commitment
to novelty than a repudiation of it. John Cages noteless composition
“4'33"” was no last music, but flowered into the impostures of Fluxus
and the ambient experiments of Brian Eno. The buildings of Frank Gehry
and Zaha Hadid did look like nothing that came before, thanks in part
to new rendering and fabrication technologies (CAD software, laser
cutting machines). The digitally produced music of Massive Attack and
even, I hate to say it, Moby did sound different from what was on the
radio 10 years before. No one style could be called the true vanguard
anymore, sure — but that did not preclude the perpetual discovery of
new ones. The forecast at the end of the 20th century was a plurality
of new images and sounds and words, powered perhaps by new, heavy
desktop production machines.
Since the start of the 21st century, despite all recent digital
accelerations of discovery and transmission, no stylistic innovations
of equivalent scale have taken place. The closest thing we can point to
has been in rap, where the staccato nihilism of drill, deeply
conversant with YouTube and SoundCloud, would sound legitimately
foreign to a listener from 2000. (When the teenage Chief Keef was
rapping in his grandmothers Chicago apartment, he was following in the
tradition of Joyce and Woolf and Pound.) In fact, the sampling
techniques pioneered in hip-hop and, later, electronic dance music —
once done with piles of records, now with folders of WAV files — have
trickled down into photography, painting, literature and lower forms
like memes, all of which now present a hyperreferentialism that sets
them slightly apart from the last centurys efforts. In the 2010s,
hip-hop alone seemed to be taking the challenge of digital progress
seriously, though it, too, has calcified since; having switched from
linear writing and recording of verses to improvising hundreds of
one-verse digital takes, rappers now seem to be converging on a single,
ProTools-produced flow.
There have also been a few movies of limited influence (and very
limited box-office success) that have introduced new cinematographic
techniques: Ang Lees “Billy Lynns Long Halftime Walk” (2016) was the
first film shot at an eerily lifelike 120 frames per second, while at
the other extreme, Steven Soderbergh shot all of “Unsane” (2018) with
an iPhone 7 Plus. Michael Bays “Ambulance” (2022) included
first-person-view drone shots, flying the viewer through the windows of
exploding cars the way your dad shot your last beach-vacation memory
reel. But by and large the technologies that have changed filmmaking
since 2000 have stayed in the postproduction studio: computer-graphics
engines, digital tools for color grading and sound editing. They have
had vanishingly little influence on the grammar of the moving image, in
the way that lightweight cameras did for the Nouvelle Vague or digital
kits did for American indie cinema. Really, the kind of image that
distinguishes this century is less the spectacular Hollywood image than
what the German artist Hito Steyerl has called the “poor image” —
low-res compressed pictures like memes, thumbnails, screenshots — whose
meaning arises from being circulated and modified.
It may just be that the lexical possibilities of many traditional media
are exhausted, and theres no shame in that. Maybe Griffith and
Eisenstein and Godard and Akerman did it all already, and its foolish
to expect a new kind of cinema. Certainly that exhaustion came long ago
to abstract painting, where every possible move can only be understood
as a quotation or reboot. (Kerstin Brätsch, one of the smartest
abstract painters working today, has acknowledged that any mark she
makes is “not empty anymore but loaded with historical reference.”)
Consider last years hit “Creepin,” by The Weeknd: a 2022 rejigger of
the 2004 Mario Winans song “I Dont Wanna Know” with no meaningful
change in instrumentation in the nearly two intervening decades. It was
hardly the only recent chart-topper to employ a clangingly obvious
sample, but its not like the endeavors of the 1990s, when Puffy and
family were rapping over “Every Breath You Take.” Back then the critic
Greg Tate could still celebrate such sampling as a motor of cultural
progress; by “collapsing all eras of Black music onto a chip,” a new
generation had new tools to write a new chapter of sound. Twenty-five
years later, the citation and rearrangement have become so automatic as
to seem automated — as our recent fears about artificial intelligence
and large language models suggest we already know.
Trapped on a modernist game board where there are no more moves to
make, a growing number of young artists essentially pivoted to
political activism — plant a tree and call it a sculpture — while
others leaned hard into absurdity to try to express the sense of
digital disorientation. You saw this Dadaist strategy in the hyperpop
of 100 gecs, in the crashed-and-burned “post-internet” art of the
collective Dis, and above all in the satirical fashion of Virgil Abloh.
(Abloh, who died in 2021, was outspoken about how comedy functioned as
a coping mechanism for a generation lost in a digital fog: “Its not a
coincidence that things have gravitated toward this invented language
of humor,” he said in 2018. “But then I often wonder: Is streetwear
hollow?”)
It wouldnt be so bad if we could just own our static position; who
cares if its novel as long as its beautiful, or meaningful? But that
pesky modernist conviction remains in us: A work of art demonstrates
its value through its freshness. So we have shifted our expectations
from new forms to new subject matter — new stories, told in the same
old languages as before. In the 20th century we were taught that
cleaving “style” from “content” was a fallacy, but in the 21st century
content (that word!) has had its ultimate vengeance, as the sole
component of culture that our machines can fully understand, transmit
and monetize. What cannot be categorized cannot be streamed; to pass
through the pipes art must become information. So, sure, there are new
songs about texting and ghosting; sure, there are superhero movies
about trauma and comedies about climate change. But in privileging the
parts of culture that can be summarized and shared — the narratives,
the characters, the lyrics, the lessons — digital media have bulldozed
an autonomous sphere of culture into a moral terrain that Aristotle
would find familiar: We again want our “content” to authentically
reflect the world (mimesis) and produce healthy feelings in its
consumers (catharsis).
Very unfortunately, this evangelical turn in the arts in the 21st
century has been conflated with the long-overdue admission of women,
people of color and out sexual minorities into the culture industry —
conflated, not least, by its P.R. departments. A gay rom-com is trotted
out as “the first”; a Black Little Mermaid is a “breakthrough”; our
museums, studios and publishing houses can bring nothing new to market
except the very people they once systematically excluded. If resisting
such market essentialism was once a primordial task of the artist — “I
am not burying myself in a narrow particularism,” Césaire made clear in
1956 as he forged a French poetry that could span the Black Atlantic —
today identities keep being diminished, brutally, into a series of
searchable tags.
This institutional hunger for novelty combined with digital
requirements for communicability may help explain why so much recently
celebrated American culture has taken such conservative, traditionalist
forms: oil portraiture, Iowa-vintage coming-of-age novels, biopics,
operettas barely distinguishable from musical theater. “It scandalizes
progressive sensibility to think that things were so much more complex
in this domain a generation ago than they are now, but there you have
it,” said Darby English, the art historian and author of “How To See a
Work of Art in Total Darkness,” when asked in 2021 about the recent
efflorescence of Black American art in museums and the market. “Because
the core project is communication,” English said, “anything that
resists the art-communications apparatus fails to leave a mark. Form
has become increasingly irrelevant during these 20 years.”
Image
Credit...Illustration by Tim Enthoven
There is no inherent reason — no reason; this point needs to be clear —
that a recession of novelty has to mean a recession of cultural worth.
On the contrary, non-novel excellence has been the state of things for
a vast majority of art history. Roman art and literature provides a
centuries-long tradition of emulation, appropriating and adapting
Greek, Etruscan and on occasion Asian examples into a culture in which
the idea of copying was alien. Medieval icons were never understood to
be “of their time,” but looked back to the time of the Incarnation,
forward to eternity or out of time entirely into a realm beyond human
life. Even beyond the halfway point of the last millennium, European
artists regularly emended, updated or substituted pre-existing artworks
at will, integrating present and past into a more spiritually
efficacious whole.
Consider also the long and bountiful history of Chinese painting, in
which, from the 13th century to the early 20th, scholar-artists
frequently demonstrated their erudition by painting in explicit homage
to masters from the past. For these literati painters, what mattered
more than technical skill or aesthetic progression was an artists
spontaneous creativity as channeled through previous masterpieces.
Theres a painting I love in the Palace Museum in Beijing by Zhao
Mengfu, a prince and scholar working during the Yuan dynasty, that
dates to around 1310 but incorporates styles from several other
periods. Spartan trees, whose branches hook like crab claws, derive
from Song examples a few centuries earlier. A clump of bamboo in the
corner coheres through strict, tight brushwork pioneered by the Han
dynasty a thousand years before. Alongside the trees and rocks the
artist added an inscription:
The rocks are like flying-white, the trees are like seal script,
The writing of bamboo draws upon the bafen method.
Only when one masters this secret
Will he understand that calligraphy and painting have always been
one.
In other words: Use one style of brushwork for one element, another for
another, just as a calligrapher uses different styles for different
purposes. But beyond the simple equation of writing and painting, Zhao
was doing something much more important: He was sublimating styles,
some from the recent past and some of great antiquity, into a series of
recombinatory elements that an artist of his time could deploy in
concert. The literati painters learned from the old masters (important
during the Yuan dynasty, to safeguard the place of Han culture under
Mongol rule), but theirs was no simple classicism. It was a practice of
aesthetic self-fulfillment that channeled itself through pre-existing
gestures. Without ever worrying about novelty, you could still speak
directly to your time. You could express your tenderest feelings, or
face up to the upheavals of your age, in the overlapping styles of
artists long dead.
Image
“Elegant Rocks and Sparse Trees,” by Zhao Mengfu, circa
1310.Credit...Palace Museum, Beijing
Someone foresaw, profoundly, that this century was going to require
something similar: that when forward motion became impossible,
ambitious culture was going to have to take another shape. Winehouse,
as producers and collaborators have reminded us since her death, was an
inveterate collector and compiler of musical clips. (The drummer and
music historian Ahmir Thompson, better known as Questlove, remembered:
“She would always be on her computer sending me MP3s: Listen to this,
listen to this. ... ’”) She was living through, and channeling into
“Back to Black,” the initial dissolution of history into streams of
digital information, disembodied, disintermediated, each no further
from the present than a Google prompt. She freely recombined those
fragments but never indulged in nostalgia; she was disappointed by the
present but knew there was no going back. And at enormous personal
cost, she created something enduring out of it, showing how much harder
it would be to leave a real mark amid fathomless data — to transcend
mere recombination, sampling, pastiche.
If the arts are to matter in the 21st century, we must still believe
that they can collectively manifest our lives and feelings: that they
can constitute a Geistgeschichte, or “history of spirit,” as the German
idealists used to say. This was entirely possible before modernism, and
it is possible after. The most ambitious abstract painters working
today, like Albert Oehlen and Charline von Heyl, are doing something
akin to Winehouses free articulation: drawing from diverse and even
contradictory styles in the hunt for forms that can still have effects.
Olga Tokarczuk structured her 2007 book, “Flights,” as a constellation
of barely connected characters and styles, more fugitive than the last
centurys novels in fragments; to read her is less like looking at a
mosaic than toggling among tabs. Bad Bunny, working at the crossroads
of trap, reggaeton, bachata and rock, is crafting pick-and-mix
aggregations of small pieces, like “Back to Black,” that are digital in
every way that matters. All of them are speaking out of parts of the
past in a language that is their own.
We have every ability to live in a culture of beauty, insight,
surprise, if we could just accept that we are no longer modern, and
have not been for a while; that somewhere in the push and pull of
digital homogeneity and political stasis we entered a new phase of
history. We have been evading our predicament with coping mechanisms
and marketing scams, which have left all of us disappointedly asking,
Whats new? Surely it would be healthier — and who knows what might
flower — if we accepted and even embraced the end of stylistic
progress, and at last took seriously the digital present we are
disavowing. And the perpetuity of “Back to Black,” still playing in the
background of avocado-toast dispensaries in East London and West
Hollywood after 17 years, suggests to me that we have not lost our
ability to identify voices of our time, even if they are fated to speak
a language yoked to the past. Culture is stuck? Progress is dead? I
died a hundred times, a poet once said, and kept singing.
[28]Jason Farago, a critic at large for The Times, writes about art and
culture in the U.S. and abroad. [29]More about Jason Farago
A version of this article appears in print on , Page 38 of the Sunday
Magazine with the headline: Out of Time. [30]Order Reprints |
[31]Todays Paper | [32]Subscribe
[33]1240
* (BUTTON) Share full article
* (BUTTON)
* (BUTTON)
* [34]1240
Advertisement
[35]SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Site Index
Site Information Navigation
* [36]© 2023 The New York Times Company
* [37]NYTCo
* [38]Contact Us
* [39]Accessibility
* [40]Work with us
* [41]Advertise
* [42]T Brand Studio
* [43]Your Ad Choices
* [44]Privacy Policy
* [45]Terms of Service
* [46]Terms of Sale
* [47]Site Map
* [48]Canada
* [49]International
* [50]Help
* [51]Subscriptions
IFRAME:
[52]https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-P528B3&gtm_auth=tfA
zqo1rYDLgYhmTnSjPqw&gtm_preview=env-130&gtm_cookies_win=x
References
Visible links:
1. nyt://article/86c70725-9ddb-5c32-9032-bf25f25572ba
2. https://www.nytimes.com/svc/oembed/json/?url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/10/magazine/stale-culture.html
3. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/13/magazine/jesmyn-ward-let-us-descend.html
4. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/12/magazine/taylor-swift-eras-tour.html
5. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/10/magazine/stale-culture.html
6. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/11/magazine/usher-rnb.html
7. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/10/08/magazine/errol-morris-interview.html
8. file:///var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L76170-8570TMP.html#site-content
9. file:///var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L76170-8570TMP.html#site-index
10. file:///var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L76170-8570TMP.html#after-sponsor
11. file:///2023/10/10/magazine/stale-culture.html
12. https://www.nytimes.com/by/jason-farago
13. https://www.nytimes.com/by/jason-farago
14. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/21/arts/design/manet-degas-met-museum.html
15. https://www.musee-orsay.fr/en/artworks/le-balcon-707
16. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/06/arts/design/nairy-baghramian-met-facade-nyc-sculpture.html
17. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/12/arts/design/stan-douglass-the-secret-agent-offers-a-refracted-vision-of-history-and-terrorism.html
18. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/11/arts/design/pierre-huyghe-serpentine-gallery-london-artist.html
19. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/02/books/review/companion-piece-ali-smith.html
20. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/28/movies/transit-review.html
21. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/24/movies/drive-my-car-review.html
22. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou0luMrf1mU
23. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/07/watching/k-drama-streaming-guide.html
24. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/23/arts/music/cxema-ukraine.html
25. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/01/arts/design/amy-winehouse-design-museum.html
26. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/20/arts/music/ice-spice-like.html
27. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRD0-GxqHVo
28. https://www.nytimes.com/by/jason-farago
29. https://www.nytimes.com/by/jason-farago
30. https://www.parsintl.com/publication/the-new-york-times/
31. https://www.nytimes.com/section/todayspaper
32. https://www.nytimes.com/subscriptions/Multiproduct/lp8HYKU.html?campaignId=48JQY
33. file:///2023/10/10/magazine/stale-culture.html
34. file:///2023/10/10/magazine/stale-culture.html
35. file:///var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L76170-8570TMP.html#after-bottom
36. https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014792127-Copyright-notice
37. https://www.nytco.com/
38. https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115015385887-Contact-Us
39. https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115015727108-Accessibility
40. https://www.nytco.com/careers/
41. https://nytmediakit.com/
42. https://www.tbrandstudio.com/
43. https://www.nytimes.com/privacy/cookie-policy#how-do-i-manage-trackers
44. https://www.nytimes.com/privacy/privacy-policy
45. https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014893428-Terms-of-service
46. https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014893968-Terms-of-sale
47. file:///sitemap/
48. https://www.nytimes.com/ca/
49. https://www.nytimes.com/international/
50. https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us
51. https://www.nytimes.com/subscription?campaignId=37WXW
52. https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-P528B3&gtm_auth=tfAzqo1rYDLgYhmTnSjPqw&gtm_preview=env-130&gtm_cookies_win=x
Hidden links:
54. file://localhost/
55. file://localhost/section/magazine
56. https://www.nytimes.com/audio/app/2023/10/10/magazine/stale-culture.html?referringSource=audioAppPromo

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
#[1]The Atlantic [2]Best of The Atlantic
[3]Skip to content
Site Navigation
*
* (BUTTON)
(BUTTON)
[4]Popular[5]Latest[6]Newsletters
Sections
+ [7]Politics
+ [8]Ideas
+ [9]Fiction
+ [10]Technology
+ [11]Science
+ [12]Photo
+ [13]Business
+ [14]Culture
+ [15]Planet
+ [16]Global
+ [17]Books
+ [18]Podcasts
+ [19]Health
+ [20]Education
+ [21]Projects
+ [22]Features
+ [23]Family
+ [24]Events
+ [25]Washington Week
+ [26]Progress
+ [27]Newsletters
+ [28]Explore The Atlantic Archive
+ [29]Play The Atlantic crossword
The Print Edition
[30]Latest Issue[31]Past Issues
______________________________________________________________
[32]Give a Gift
* (BUTTON)
Search The Atlantic
(BUTTON) ____________________
Quick Links
+ [33]Dear Therapist
Dear Therapist
+ [34]Crossword Puzzle
Crossword Puzzle
+ [35]Magazine Archive
Magazine Archive
+ [36]Your Subscription
Your Subscription
(BUTTON)
* [37]Popular
* [38]Latest
* [39]Newsletters
* [40]Sign In
* [41]Subscribe
[42]More From Planet
More From Planet
[43]Explore This Series
* Satellite imagery provided by GOES-16 satellite shows Hurricane
Otis making landfall near Acapulco, Mexico, as a Category 5 storm.
It's bright red in the center.
Hurricane Otis Was Too Fast for the Forecasters[44]Zoë Schlanger
* Cropped images of fruit and bread in a grid
The Great Underappreciated Driver of Climate Change[45]Alexandra Frost
* White threads of mycelium growing on tree bark.
The Invisible Force Keeping Carbon in the Ground[46]Zoë Schlanger
* A collage of 12 photographs of e-bikes against a light-pink
background
The Real Reason You Should Get an E-bike[47]Michael Thomas
[48]Health
The Real Reason You Should Get an E-bike
Itll cut your emissions. Itll also make you happier.
By [49]Michael Thomas
A collage of 12 photographs of e-bikes against a light-pink background
Illustration by The Atlantic. Source: Getty.
October 20, 2023
(BUTTON) Share
[50]Saved Stories (BUTTON) Save
Todays happiness and personal-finance gurus have no shortage of advice
for living a good life. Meditate daily. Sleep for eight hours a night.
Dont forget to save for retirement. Theyre not wrong, but few of
these experts will tell you one of the best ways to improve your life:
Ditch your car.
A year ago, my wife and I sold one of our cars and replaced it with an
e-bike. As someone who writes about climate change, I knew that I was
doing something good for the planet. I knew that passenger vehicles are
responsible for much of our greenhouse-gas emissions—[51]16 percent in
the U.S., to be exact—and that the pollution spewing from gas-powered
cars doesnt just heat up the planet; it could increase the risk of
[52]premature death. I also knew that electric cars were an imperfect
fix: Though theyre responsible for less carbon pollution than gas
cars, even when powered by todays dirty electric grid, their supply
chain is carbon intensive, and many of the materials needed to produce
their batteries are, in some cases, mined via a process that
[53]brutally exploits workers and harms [54]ecosystems and sacred
Indigenous lands. An e-bikes comparatively tiny battery means less
electricity, fewer emissions, fewer resources. They are clearly better
for the planet than cars of any kind.
[55]Read: America is missing out on the biggest EV boom of all
I knew all of this. But I also viewed getting rid of my car as a
sacrifice—something for the militant and reckless, something that
Greenpeace volunteers did to make the world better. I live in Colorado;
e-biking would mean freezing in the winter and sweating in the summer.
It was the right thing to do, I thought, but it was not going to be
fun.
I was very wrong. The first thing I noticed was the savings. Between
car payments, insurance, maintenance, and gas, a car-centered lifestyle
is expensive. According to AAA, after fuel, maintenance, insurance,
taxes, and the like, owning and driving a new car in America costs[56]
$10,728 a year. My e-bike, by comparison, cost $2,000 off the rack and
has near-negligible recurring charges. After factoring in maintenance
and a few bucks a month in electricity costs, I estimate that well
save about $50,000 over the next five years by ditching our car.
The actual experience of riding to work each day over the past year has
been equally surprising. Before selling our car, I worried most about
riding in the cold winter months. But I quickly learned that, as the
saying goes, there is [57]no bad weather, only bad gear. I wear gloves,
warm socks, a balaclava, and a ski jacket when I ride, and am almost
never too cold.
Sara Hastings-Simon is a professor at the University of Calgary, where
she studies low-carbon transportation systems. Shes also a native
Californian who now bikes to work in a city where temperatures tend to
hover around freezing from December through March. She told me that
with the right equipment, shes able to do it on all but the snowiest
days—days when she wouldnt want to be in a car, either. “Those days
are honestly a mess even on the roads,” she said.
And though I, like [58]many would-be cyclists, was worried about
arriving at the office sweaty in hotter months, the e-bike solved my
problem. Even when it was 90 degrees outside, I didnt break a sweat,
thanks to my bikes pedal-assist mode. If Im honest, sometimes I
didnt even pedal; I just used the throttle, sat back, and enjoyed my
ride.
Indeed, a big part of the appeal here is in the e part of the bike:
“E-bikes arent just a traditional bike with a motor. They are an
entirely new technology,” Hastings-Simon told me. Riding them is a
radically different experience from riding a normal bike, at least when
it comes to the hard parts of cycling. “Its so much easier to take a
bike over a bridge or in a hilly neighborhood,” Laura Fox, the former
general manager of New York Citys bike-share program, told me. “Ive
had countless people come up to me and say, I never thought that I
could bike to work before, and now that I have an option where you
dont have to show up sweaty, its possible.’” (When New York
introduced e-bikes to its fleet, ridership tripled, she told me, from
500,000 to 1.5 million people.)
[59]Read: How to get fewer people to commute in cars
But biking to work wasnt just not unpleasant—it was downright
enjoyable. It made me feel happier and healthier; I arrived to work a
little more buoyant for having spent the morning in fresh air rather
than traffic. [60]Study after [61]study shows that people with longer
car commutes are more likely to experience poor health outcomes and
lower personal well-being—and that cyclists are the [62]happiest
commuters. One day, shortly after selling our car, I hopped on my bike
after a stressful day at work and rode home down a street edged with
changing fall leaves. I felt more connected to the physical environment
around me than I had when Id traveled the same route surrounded by
metal and glass. I breathed in the air, my muscles relaxed, and I
grinned like a giddy schoolchild.
“E-bikes are like a miracle drug,” David Zipper, a transportation
expert and Visiting Fellow at Harvard Kennedy School, told me. “They
provide so much upside, not just for the riders, but for the people who
are living around them too.”
Of course, e-bikes arent going to replace every car on every trip. In
a country where sprawling suburbs and strip malls, not protected bike
lanes, are the norm, its unrealistic to expect e-bikes to replace cars
in the way that the Model T replaced horses. But we dont need everyone
to ride an e-bike to work to make a big dent in our carbon-pollution
problem. [63]A recent study found that if 5 percent of commuters were
to switch to e-bikes as their mode of transportation, emissions would
fall by 4 percent. As an individual, you dont even need to sell your
car to reduce your carbon footprint significantly. In 2021, half of all
trips in the United States were less than three miles, according to
[64]the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Making those short trips
on an e-bike instead of in a car would likely save people money, cut
their emissions, and improve their health and happiness.
E-bikes are such a no-brainer for individuals, and for the collective,
that state and local governments [65]are now subsidizing them. In May,
I asked Will Toor, the executive director of the Colorado Energy
Office, to explain the states rationale for [66]a newly passed
incentive that offers residents $450 to get an e-bike. He dutifully
ticked through the environmental benefits and potential cost savings
for low-income people. Then he surprised me: The legislation, he added,
was also about “putting more joy into the world.”
This story is part of the Atlantic Planet series supported by HHMIs
Science and Educational Media Group.
References
Visible links:
1. file:///feed/all/
2. file:///feed/best-of/
3. file:///var/folders/q9/qlz2w5251kzdfgn0np7z2s4c0000gn/T/L8425-8528TMP.html#main-content
4. file:///most-popular/
5. file:///latest/
6. file:///newsletters/
7. file:///politics/
8. file:///ideas/
9. https://www.theatlantic.com/category/fiction/
10. file:///technology/
11. file:///science/
12. https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/
13. file:///business/
14. file:///culture/
15. file:///projects/planet/
16. file:///international/
17. file:///books/
18. file:///podcasts/
19. file:///health/
20. file:///education/
21. file:///projects/
22. https://www.theatlantic.com/category/features/
23. file:///family/
24. file:///events/
25. https://www.theatlantic.com/category/washington-week-atlantic/
26. https://www.theatlantic.com/progress/
27. file:///newsletters/
28. file:///archive/
29. file:///free-daily-crossword-puzzle/
30. file:///magazine/
31. file:///magazine/backissues/
32. https://accounts.theatlantic.com/products/gift
33. file:///projects/dear-therapist/
34. file:///free-daily-crossword-puzzle/
35. file:///archive/
36. https://accounts.theatlantic.com/accounts/subscription/
37. file:///most-popular/
38. file:///latest/
39. file:///newsletters/
40. https://accounts.theatlantic.com/login/
41. https://www.theatlantic.com/subscribe/navbar/
42. https://www.theatlantic.com/projects/planet/
43. https://www.theatlantic.com/projects/planet/
44. https://www.theatlantic.com/author/zoe-schlanger/
45. https://www.theatlantic.com/author/alexandra-frost/
46. https://www.theatlantic.com/author/zoe-schlanger/
47. https://www.theatlantic.com/author/michael-thomas/
48. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/
49. https://www.theatlantic.com/author/michael-thomas/
50. https://accounts.theatlantic.com/accounts/saved-stories/
51. https://energy.mit.edu/news/us-passenger-cars/
52. https://qz.com/135509/more-americans-die-from-car-pollution-than-car-accidents
53. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/02/01/1152893248/red-cobalt-congo-drc-mining-siddharth-kara
54. https://www.nrdc.org/stories/lithium-mining-leaving-chiles-indigenous-communities-high-and-dry-literally
55. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2023/04/electric-ev-rickshaw-sales-climate-change/673629/
56. https://newsroom.aaa.com/2022/08/annual-cost-of-new-car-ownership-crosses-10k-mark/
57. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/01/how-socialize-outside-winter/617520/
58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214140518306054
59. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2018/02/seattle-car-commute/553589/
60. https://travelbehaviour.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/caw-summaryreport-onlineedition.pdf
61. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-commuting/long-commutes-may-be-bad-for-health-study-idUKBRE8470U520120508
62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214140518305255
63. https://peopleforbikes.cdn.prismic.io/peopleforbikes/e3dad6f7-d81b-4e59-9208-b012406ffa8e_E-bike-Potential-Paper-05_15_19-Final.pdf
64. https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/articles/fotw-1230-march-21-2022-more-half-all-daily-trips-were-less-three-miles-2021#:~:text=A research study for the,were greater than 50 miles.
65. https://electrek.co/2023/02/19/free-electric-bikes-rebates-us-cities-and-states/
66. https://www.cpr.org/2023/08/10/colorado-ebike-rebates-how-to-qualify/
Hidden links:
68. file://localhost/
69. file://localhost/magazine/
70. file://localhost/
71. file://localhost/
72. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2023/10/hurricane-otis-forecast-warming-oceans/675773/
73. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2023/10/american-families-have-massive-food-waste-problem/675744/
74. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2023/10/tree-survival-fungi-corsica-climate-change/675739/
75. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2023/10/reasons-to-get-e-bike-emissions-climate-change-benefits/675716/