Use w3m for archiving
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,367 +1,359 @@
|
||||
#[1]home
|
||||
[1]Jump to Content
|
||||
[2]
|
||||
Cloud
|
||||
[4]Blog
|
||||
[5]Contact sales [6]Get started for free
|
||||
[7][ ]
|
||||
[13]
|
||||
Cloud
|
||||
[14]Blog
|
||||
|
||||
[2]Jump to Content
|
||||
• Solutions & technology
|
||||
□ [15]AI & Machine Learning
|
||||
□ [16]API Management
|
||||
□ [17]Application Development
|
||||
□ [18]Application Modernization
|
||||
□ [19]Chrome Enterprise
|
||||
□ [20]Compute
|
||||
□ [21]Containers & Kubernetes
|
||||
□ [22]Data Analytics
|
||||
□ [23]Databases
|
||||
□ [24]DevOps & SRE
|
||||
□ [25]Maps & Geospatial
|
||||
□ [26]Security & Identity
|
||||
□ [27]Infrastructure
|
||||
□ [28]Infrastructure Modernization
|
||||
□ [29]Networking
|
||||
□ [30]Productivity & Collaboration
|
||||
□ [31]SAP on Google Cloud
|
||||
□ [32]Storage & Data Transfer
|
||||
□ [33]Sustainability
|
||||
• Ecosystem
|
||||
□ [34]IT Leaders
|
||||
□ Industries
|
||||
☆ [35]Financial Services
|
||||
☆ [36]Healthcare & Life Sciences
|
||||
☆ [37]Manufacturing
|
||||
☆ [38]Media & Entertainment
|
||||
☆ [39]Public Sector
|
||||
☆ [40]Retail
|
||||
☆ [41]Supply Chain
|
||||
☆ [42]Telecommunications
|
||||
□ [43]Partners
|
||||
□ [44]Startups & SMB
|
||||
□ [45]Training & Certifications
|
||||
□ [46]Inside Google Cloud
|
||||
□ [47]Google Cloud Next & Events
|
||||
□ [48]Google Maps Platform
|
||||
□ [49]Google Workspace
|
||||
• [50]Developers & Practitioners
|
||||
• [51]Transform with Google Cloud
|
||||
|
||||
Cloud
|
||||
(BUTTON)
|
||||
[3]Blog
|
||||
[4]Contact sales [5]Get started for free
|
||||
____________________
|
||||
[52]Contact sales [53]Get started for free
|
||||
[54][ ]
|
||||
Application Modernization
|
||||
|
||||
Cloud
|
||||
[6]Blog
|
||||
Why I love Go
|
||||
|
||||
* Solutions & technology
|
||||
+ [7]AI & Machine Learning
|
||||
+ [8]API Management
|
||||
+ [9]Application Development
|
||||
+ [10]Application Modernization
|
||||
+ [11]Chrome Enterprise
|
||||
+ [12]Compute
|
||||
+ [13]Containers & Kubernetes
|
||||
+ [14]Data Analytics
|
||||
+ [15]Databases
|
||||
+ [16]DevOps & SRE
|
||||
+ [17]Maps & Geospatial
|
||||
+ [18]Security & Identity
|
||||
+ [19]Infrastructure
|
||||
+ [20]Infrastructure Modernization
|
||||
+ [21]Networking
|
||||
+ [22]Productivity & Collaboration
|
||||
+ [23]SAP on Google Cloud
|
||||
+ [24]Storage & Data Transfer
|
||||
+ [25]Sustainability
|
||||
* Ecosystem
|
||||
+ [26]IT Leaders
|
||||
+ Industries
|
||||
o [27]Financial Services
|
||||
o [28]Healthcare & Life Sciences
|
||||
o [29]Manufacturing
|
||||
o [30]Media & Entertainment
|
||||
o [31]Public Sector
|
||||
o [32]Retail
|
||||
o [33]Supply Chain
|
||||
o [34]Telecommunications
|
||||
+ [35]Partners
|
||||
+ [36]Startups & SMB
|
||||
+ [37]Training & Certifications
|
||||
+ [38]Inside Google Cloud
|
||||
+ [39]Google Cloud Next & Events
|
||||
+ [40]Google Maps Platform
|
||||
+ [41]Google Workspace
|
||||
* [42]Developers & Practitioners
|
||||
* [43]Transform with Google Cloud
|
||||
September 12, 2022
|
||||
|
||||
[44]Contact sales [45]Get started for free
|
||||
____________________
|
||||
|
||||
Application Modernization
|
||||
|
||||
Why I love Go
|
||||
September 12, 2022
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
• [60]
|
||||
• [61]
|
||||
• [62]
|
||||
• [63]
|
||||
|
||||
David Yach
|
||||
|
||||
Director of Engineering at Google Cloud
|
||||
Director of Engineering at Google Cloud
|
||||
|
||||
I’ve been building software over the last four decades, as a developer,
|
||||
manager and executive in both small and large software companies. I
|
||||
started my career working on commercial compilers, first BASIC and then
|
||||
C. I have written a lot of code in many different languages, and
|
||||
managed teams with even broader language usage.
|
||||
I’ve been building software over the last four decades, as a developer, manager
|
||||
and executive in both small and large software companies. I started my career
|
||||
working on commercial compilers, first BASIC and then C. I have written a lot
|
||||
of code in many different languages, and managed teams with even broader
|
||||
language usage.
|
||||
|
||||
I learned Go about 5 years ago when I was CTO at a startup/scaleup. At
|
||||
the time, we were looking to move to a microservice architecture, and
|
||||
that shift gave us the opportunity to consider moving away from the
|
||||
incumbent language (Scala). As I read through the Go tutorials, my
|
||||
compiler-writing background came back to me and I found myself
|
||||
repeatedly thinking “That’s cool – I know why the Go team did that!â€<C3A2> So
|
||||
I got hooked on the language design.
|
||||
I learned Go about 5 years ago when I was CTO at a startup/scaleup. At the
|
||||
time, we were looking to move to a microservice architecture, and that shift
|
||||
gave us the opportunity to consider moving away from the incumbent language
|
||||
(Scala). As I read through the Go tutorials, my compiler-writing background
|
||||
came back to me and I found myself repeatedly thinking “That’s cool – I know
|
||||
why the Go team did that!” So I got hooked on the language design.
|
||||
|
||||
Learning
|
||||
|
||||
I have worked with many different computer languages over the years, so
|
||||
I was not surprised I could quickly get started writing Go programs
|
||||
after reading through the online documents and tutorials. But then when
|
||||
I saw a new co-op student (a.k.a. intern) learn Go and write a
|
||||
substantial prototype in their first two weeks on the job, it became
|
||||
clear that Go was much easier to learn than many other languages.
|
||||
I have worked with many different computer languages over the years, so I was
|
||||
not surprised I could quickly get started writing Go programs after reading
|
||||
through the online documents and tutorials. But then when I saw a new co-op
|
||||
student (a.k.a. intern) learn Go and write a substantial prototype in their
|
||||
first two weeks on the job, it became clear that Go was much easier to learn
|
||||
than many other languages.
|
||||
|
||||
Writing code
|
||||
|
||||
As I started writing my first Go programs, the first thing that struck
|
||||
me was the blazing compiler speed. It was as fast or faster starting my
|
||||
application than many interpreted languages, yet it was a compiled
|
||||
program with a strongly typed language. (I have an affinity for
|
||||
strongly typed languages – I have spent way too much time tracking down
|
||||
obscure issues in my own code in dynamic typed languages, where the
|
||||
same issue would have been a compile error in a strongly typed
|
||||
language.) Even better, in Go I often don’t need to declare the type –
|
||||
the compiler figures it out.
|
||||
As I started writing my first Go programs, the first thing that struck me was
|
||||
the blazing compiler speed. It was as fast or faster starting my application
|
||||
than many interpreted languages, yet it was a compiled program with a strongly
|
||||
typed language. (I have an affinity for strongly typed languages – I have spent
|
||||
way too much time tracking down obscure issues in my own code in dynamic typed
|
||||
languages, where the same issue would have been a compile error in a strongly
|
||||
typed language.) Even better, in Go I often don’t need to declare the type –
|
||||
the compiler figures it out.
|
||||
|
||||
I was impressed with the standard Go library – it included many of the
|
||||
capabilities required by modern applications – things like HTTP
|
||||
support, JSON handling and encryption. Many other languages required
|
||||
you to use a third-party library for these features, and often there
|
||||
were multiple competing libraries to choose from, adding another
|
||||
decision point for the developer. With Go, I could go to the standard
|
||||
library GoDoc and get started right away.
|
||||
I was impressed with the standard Go library – it included many of the
|
||||
capabilities required by modern applications – things like HTTP support, JSON
|
||||
handling and encryption. Many other languages required you to use a third-party
|
||||
library for these features, and often there were multiple competing libraries
|
||||
to choose from, adding another decision point for the developer. With Go, I
|
||||
could go to the standard library GoDoc and get started right away.
|
||||
|
||||
There were a few other language decisions that I found helpful. One is
|
||||
that the compiler figures out if you are returning a pointer to a
|
||||
local, and behind the scenes allocates the memory rather than using the
|
||||
stack. This prevents bugs, and I find the code more readable.
|
||||
There were a few other language decisions that I found helpful. One is that the
|
||||
compiler figures out if you are returning a pointer to a local, and behind the
|
||||
scenes allocates the memory rather than using the stack. This prevents bugs,
|
||||
and I find the code more readable.
|
||||
|
||||
I also like that you don’t declare that you support an interface. I
|
||||
wasn’t sure I would like this at first because it isn’t obvious if a
|
||||
type implements a particular interface, but I found greater value in
|
||||
the fact that I wasn’t dependent on the code author (even if it was
|
||||
me!) to declare that the interface is implemented. This first hit home
|
||||
when I used fmt.Println() and it automatically used the String() method
|
||||
I had implemented even though it hadn’t occurred to me that I was
|
||||
implementing the Stringer interface.
|
||||
I also like that you don’t declare that you support an interface. I wasn’t sure
|
||||
I would like this at first because it isn’t obvious if a type implements a
|
||||
particular interface, but I found greater value in the fact that I wasn’t
|
||||
dependent on the code author (even if it was me!) to declare that the interface
|
||||
is implemented. This first hit home when I used fmt.Println() and it
|
||||
automatically used the String() method I had implemented even though it hadn’t
|
||||
occurred to me that I was implementing the Stringer interface.
|
||||
|
||||
The last feature I’ll note is the ability to do concurrent programming
|
||||
through channels and goroutines. The model is simple to understand yet
|
||||
powerful.
|
||||
The last feature I’ll note is the ability to do concurrent programming through
|
||||
channels and goroutines. The model is simple to understand yet powerful.
|
||||
|
||||
Reading code
|
||||
|
||||
After writing more Go code and starting to incorporate third party
|
||||
libraries, I had a realization that had never occurred to me before –
|
||||
as a developer, I spend a lot of time reading code. In fact, I probably
|
||||
spend more time reading code than writing it, once you start counting
|
||||
code reviews, debugging, and evaluating third-party libraries.
|
||||
After writing more Go code and starting to incorporate third party libraries, I
|
||||
had a realization that had never occurred to me before – as a developer, I
|
||||
spend a lot of time reading code. In fact, I probably spend more time reading
|
||||
code than writing it, once you start counting code reviews, debugging, and
|
||||
evaluating third-party libraries.
|
||||
|
||||
What was different about reading Go code? I would summarize it by “it
|
||||
all looks the same.â€<EFBFBD> What do I mean by that? Go format ensures all the
|
||||
braces are in the same spot; capitalized identifiers are exported;
|
||||
there are no implicit conversions, even of internal types; and there is
|
||||
no overloading of operators, functions or methods. That means that with
|
||||
Go code, “what you see is what you getâ€<C3A2> with no hidden meaning. Of
|
||||
course, it doesn’t help me to understand a complicated algorithm, but
|
||||
it does mean that I can concentrate more on that algorithm because I
|
||||
don’t have to understand whether ‘+’ is overloaded, for example.
|
||||
What was different about reading Go code? I would summarize it by “it all looks
|
||||
the same.” What do I mean by that? Go format ensures all the braces are in the
|
||||
same spot; capitalized identifiers are exported; there are no implicit
|
||||
conversions, even of internal types; and there is no overloading of operators,
|
||||
functions or methods. That means that with Go code, “what you see is what you
|
||||
get” with no hidden meaning. Of course, it doesn’t help me to understand a
|
||||
complicated algorithm, but it does mean that I can concentrate more on that
|
||||
algorithm because I don’t have to understand whether ‘+’ is overloaded, for
|
||||
example.
|
||||
|
||||
I was also pleasantly surprised when I used GoDoc on one of my
|
||||
projects, and discovered that I had semi-reasonable documentation
|
||||
without doing anything while writing the code other than adding
|
||||
comments on my functions and methods based on nagging from the IDE I
|
||||
was using. I did spend some time cleaning up the comments after that,
|
||||
but I’m not sure I would have even started that work if Go hadn’t given
|
||||
me a great starting point.
|
||||
I was also pleasantly surprised when I used GoDoc on one of my projects, and
|
||||
discovered that I had semi-reasonable documentation without doing anything
|
||||
while writing the code other than adding comments on my functions and methods
|
||||
based on nagging from the IDE I was using. I did spend some time cleaning up
|
||||
the comments after that, but I’m not sure I would have even started that work
|
||||
if Go hadn’t given me a great starting point.
|
||||
|
||||
Testing code
|
||||
|
||||
Go test is part of the standard Go tools and supported by IDEs, making
|
||||
it easy to get started creating unit tests for my code. And like the
|
||||
standard Go library, having a standard way to do tests means I don’t
|
||||
have to evaluate external testing frameworks and select one. I can also
|
||||
understand the tests when I’m evaluating a third party library.
|
||||
Go test is part of the standard Go tools and supported by IDEs, making it easy
|
||||
to get started creating unit tests for my code. And like the standard Go
|
||||
library, having a standard way to do tests means I don’t have to evaluate
|
||||
external testing frameworks and select one. I can also understand the tests
|
||||
when I’m evaluating a third party library.
|
||||
|
||||
Even better, the default behavior running package tests in VSCode is to
|
||||
enable Go’s built-in code coverage. I had never taken code coverage
|
||||
seriously working in other languages, partly because it was often
|
||||
difficult to set up. But the immediate feedback (helped by the blazing
|
||||
compile speed) gamified this for me, and I found myself adding tests to
|
||||
increase code coverage (and finding new bugs along the way).
|
||||
Even better, the default behavior running package tests in VSCode is to enable
|
||||
Go’s built-in code coverage. I had never taken code coverage seriously working
|
||||
in other languages, partly because it was often difficult to set up. But the
|
||||
immediate feedback (helped by the blazing compile speed) gamified this for me,
|
||||
and I found myself adding tests to increase code coverage (and finding new bugs
|
||||
along the way).
|
||||
|
||||
Go doesn’t allow circular dependencies between packages. While this has
|
||||
caused me some rethinking while writing code, I find it makes my
|
||||
testing regimen easier to think about – if I depend on a package, I can
|
||||
rely on that package to have its own tests covering its capabilities.
|
||||
Go doesn’t allow circular dependencies between packages. While this has caused
|
||||
me some rethinking while writing code, I find it makes my testing regimen
|
||||
easier to think about – if I depend on a package, I can rely on that package to
|
||||
have its own tests covering its capabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
Deploying code
|
||||
|
||||
I learned Go at the same time we were migrating towards container-based
|
||||
microservices. In that environment, the fact that Go produces a single,
|
||||
self-contained executable makes it much easier and more efficient to
|
||||
build and manage containers. I can build a container layer with one
|
||||
single file, which is often a single-digit number of MB in size,
|
||||
compared to our prior JVM-based containers which started with hundreds
|
||||
of MB for the Java runtime then another layer for our application. (It
|
||||
is easy to forget how much this overhead ends up costing in production,
|
||||
particularly if you have hundreds or thousands of containers running).
|
||||
I learned Go at the same time we were migrating towards container-based
|
||||
microservices. In that environment, the fact that Go produces a single,
|
||||
self-contained executable makes it much easier and more efficient to build and
|
||||
manage containers. I can build a container layer with one single file, which is
|
||||
often a single-digit number of MB in size, compared to our prior JVM-based
|
||||
containers which started with hundreds of MB for the Java runtime then another
|
||||
layer for our application. (It is easy to forget how much this overhead ends up
|
||||
costing in production, particularly if you have hundreds or thousands of
|
||||
containers running).
|
||||
|
||||
Second, Go has built-in cross compiling capabilities so our development
|
||||
machines, containers and cloud hardware don’t all have to all be on the
|
||||
same processor or operating system. For example, I can use a Linux
|
||||
build machine to produce client executables for Linux, Mac and Windows.
|
||||
Again, this takes away a complicated decision process due to artificial
|
||||
constraints.
|
||||
Second, Go has built-in cross compiling capabilities so our development
|
||||
machines, containers and cloud hardware don’t all have to all be on the same
|
||||
processor or operating system. For example, I can use a Linux build machine to
|
||||
produce client executables for Linux, Mac and Windows. Again, this takes away a
|
||||
complicated decision process due to artificial constraints.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, Go has established a well defined set of principles for
|
||||
versioning and compatibility. While not all pieces of this are
|
||||
enforced, having the principles from an authoritative source helps
|
||||
manage the real life challenges of keeping your software supply chain
|
||||
up to date. For example, it is strongly recommended that breaking
|
||||
changes require a new major version number. While not enforced, it
|
||||
leads the community to call out any open source package that violates
|
||||
this principle.
|
||||
Finally, Go has established a well defined set of principles for versioning and
|
||||
compatibility. While not all pieces of this are enforced, having the principles
|
||||
from an authoritative source helps manage the real life challenges of keeping
|
||||
your software supply chain up to date. For example, it is strongly recommended
|
||||
that breaking changes require a new major version number. While not enforced,
|
||||
it leads the community to call out any open source package that violates this
|
||||
principle.
|
||||
|
||||
What do I miss?
|
||||
|
||||
I did miss generics; thankfully Go 1.18 added support. And I do wish
|
||||
the standard library offered immutable collections (like Scala and
|
||||
other functional languages). Embedding instead of inheritance works
|
||||
pretty much the same in many cases, but requires some deep thinking
|
||||
sometimes.
|
||||
I did miss generics; thankfully Go 1.18 added support. And I do wish the
|
||||
standard library offered immutable collections (like Scala and other functional
|
||||
languages). Embedding instead of inheritance works pretty much the same in many
|
||||
cases, but requires some deep thinking sometimes.
|
||||
|
||||
My most frequent coding mistake is when I should have used a pointer
|
||||
receiver for a method and didn’t, then modify the receiver expecting
|
||||
the changes to be visible when the method returns. The code looks
|
||||
correct, the right values get assigned if I use a debugger to step
|
||||
through or issue prints, but the changes disappear after the method
|
||||
returns. I think I would have preferred if receivers were immutable, it
|
||||
would have caught these errors at compile time, and in the few
|
||||
remaining cases where I wanted to modify the receiver I would have
|
||||
copied it to a local variable.
|
||||
My most frequent coding mistake is when I should have used a pointer receiver
|
||||
for a method and didn’t, then modify the receiver expecting the changes to be
|
||||
visible when the method returns. The code looks correct, the right values get
|
||||
assigned if I use a debugger to step through or issue prints, but the changes
|
||||
disappear after the method returns. I think I would have preferred if receivers
|
||||
were immutable, it would have caught these errors at compile time, and in the
|
||||
few remaining cases where I wanted to modify the receiver I would have copied
|
||||
it to a local variable.
|
||||
|
||||
In conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
As you can tell, I am a huge fan of Go, from even before I joined
|
||||
Google. I am impressed by the language and ecosystem design, and by the
|
||||
implementation. For me, Go makes me a more productive developer and I’m
|
||||
more confident in the quality of the code I produce.
|
||||
As you can tell, I am a huge fan of Go, from even before I joined Google. I am
|
||||
impressed by the language and ecosystem design, and by the implementation. For
|
||||
me, Go makes me a more productive developer and I’m more confident in the
|
||||
quality of the code I produce.
|
||||
|
||||
Go, give it a [46]try!
|
||||
Go, give it a [64]try!
|
||||
|
||||
Posted in
|
||||
* [47]Application Modernization
|
||||
* [48]Application Development
|
||||
* [49]Open Source
|
||||
Posted in
|
||||
|
||||
• [65]Application Modernization
|
||||
• [66]Application Development
|
||||
• [67]Open Source
|
||||
|
||||
Related articles
|
||||
|
||||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/containers
|
||||
_2022_anH39my.max-700x700.jpg
|
||||
DevOps & SRE
|
||||
[68]
|
||||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/
|
||||
containers_2022_anH39my.max-700x700.jpg
|
||||
DevOps & SRE
|
||||
|
||||
Best practices for consuming public Docker Hub content
|
||||
|
||||
By Rishi Mukhopadhyay • 2-minute read
|
||||
By Rishi Mukhopadhyay • 2-minute read
|
||||
|
||||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/General-GC
|
||||
_Blog_header_2436x1200-v1.max-700x700.jpg
|
||||
Google Cloud
|
||||
[69]
|
||||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/
|
||||
General-GC_Blog_header_2436x1200-v1.max-700x700.jpg
|
||||
Google Cloud
|
||||
|
||||
The overwhelmed person’s guide to Google Cloud: week of Dec 18
|
||||
|
||||
By Forrest Brazeal • 2-minute read
|
||||
By Forrest Brazeal • 2-minute read
|
||||
|
||||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Google_Clo
|
||||
ud_AIML_thumbnail.max-700x700.jpg
|
||||
AI & Machine Learning
|
||||
[70]
|
||||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/
|
||||
Google_Cloud_AIML_thumbnail.max-700x700.jpg
|
||||
AI & Machine Learning
|
||||
|
||||
Have the AI build your app for you!
|
||||
|
||||
By Max Saltonstall • 2-minute read
|
||||
By Max Saltonstall • 2-minute read
|
||||
|
||||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/DO_NOT_USE
|
||||
_Wfx45fA.max-700x700.jpg
|
||||
Application Modernization
|
||||
[71]
|
||||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/
|
||||
DO_NOT_USE_Wfx45fA.max-700x700.jpg
|
||||
Application Modernization
|
||||
|
||||
Apollo24|7: Migrating a complex microservices application to Google Cloud
|
||||
with zero downtime
|
||||
Apollo24|7: Migrating a complex microservices application to Google Cloud with
|
||||
zero downtime
|
||||
|
||||
By Nishu Saxena • 4-minute read
|
||||
By Nishu Saxena • 4-minute read
|
||||
|
||||
Footer Links
|
||||
Footer Links
|
||||
|
||||
Follow us
|
||||
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
• [72]
|
||||
• [73]
|
||||
• [74]
|
||||
• [75]
|
||||
• [76]
|
||||
|
||||
* [50]Google Cloud
|
||||
* [51]Google Cloud Products
|
||||
* [52]Privacy
|
||||
* [53]Terms
|
||||
* [54]Cookies management controls
|
||||
[77]
|
||||
|
||||
* [55]Help
|
||||
* [‪English‬__€¬..]
|
||||
• [78]Google Cloud
|
||||
• [79]Google Cloud Products
|
||||
• [80]Privacy
|
||||
• [81]Terms
|
||||
• [82]Cookies management controls
|
||||
|
||||
References
|
||||
• [83]Help
|
||||
• [84][Language ]
|
||||
|
||||
Visible links:
|
||||
1. https://cloud.google.com/?lfhs=2
|
||||
2. https://cloud.google.com/blog/#content
|
||||
3. https://cloud.google.com/blog
|
||||
4. https://cloud.google.com/contact/
|
||||
5. https://console.cloud.google.com/freetrial/
|
||||
6. https://cloud.google.com/blog
|
||||
7. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning
|
||||
8. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/api-management
|
||||
9. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-development
|
||||
10. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization
|
||||
11. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/chrome-enterprise
|
||||
12. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/compute
|
||||
13. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/containers-kubernetes
|
||||
14. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics
|
||||
15. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/databases
|
||||
16. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/devops-sre
|
||||
17. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/maps-geospatial
|
||||
18. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security
|
||||
19. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure
|
||||
20. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure-modernization
|
||||
21. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/networking
|
||||
22. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/productivity-collaboration
|
||||
23. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/sap-google-cloud
|
||||
24. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/storage-data-transfer
|
||||
25. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/sustainability
|
||||
26. https://cloud.google.com/transform
|
||||
27. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/financial-services
|
||||
28. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/healthcare-life-sciences
|
||||
29. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/manufacturing
|
||||
30. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/media-entertainment
|
||||
31. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/public-sector
|
||||
32. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/retail
|
||||
33. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/supply-chain-logistics
|
||||
34. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/telecommunications
|
||||
35. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/partners
|
||||
36. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/startups
|
||||
37. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/training-certifications
|
||||
38. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud
|
||||
39. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/google-cloud-next
|
||||
40. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/maps-platform
|
||||
41. https://workspace.google.com/blog
|
||||
42. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/developers-practitioners
|
||||
43. https://cloud.google.com/transform
|
||||
44. https://cloud.google.com/contact/
|
||||
45. https://console.cloud.google.com/freetrial/
|
||||
46. https://go.dev/tour/list
|
||||
47. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization
|
||||
48. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-development
|
||||
49. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/open-source
|
||||
50. https://cloud.google.com/
|
||||
51. https://cloud.google.com/products/
|
||||
52. https://myaccount.google.com/privacypolicy?hl=en-US
|
||||
53. https://myaccount.google.com/termsofservice?hl=en-US
|
||||
54. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||||
55. https://support.google.com/
|
||||
|
||||
Hidden links:
|
||||
57. https://cloud.google.com/
|
||||
58. https://cloud.google.com/
|
||||
59. https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Why%20I%20love%20Go%20@googlecloud&url=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||||
60. https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go&title=Why%20I%20love%20Go
|
||||
61. https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?caption=Why%20I%20love%20Go&u=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||||
62. mailto:?subject=Why%20I%20love%20Go&body=Check%20out%20this%20article%20on%20the%20Cloud%20Blog:%0A%0AWhy%20I%20love%20Go%0A%0ALearn%20all%20the%20reasons%20David%20Yach,%20industry%20veteran%20and%20Director%20of%20Engineering%20at%20Google%20Cloud,%20loves%20to%20use%20Go%20for%20software%20development.%0A%0Ahttps://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||||
63. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/devops-sre/using-authenticated-logins-for-docker-hub-in-google-cloud
|
||||
64. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/the-overwhelmed-persons-guide-to-google-cloud
|
||||
65. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/have-duet-ai-make-your-next-app-using-conversation
|
||||
66. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/migrating-a-microservices-application-with-no-downtime
|
||||
67. https://www.twitter.com/googlecloud
|
||||
68. https://www.youtube.com/googlecloud
|
||||
69. https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/google-cloud
|
||||
70. https://www.instagram.com/googlecloud/
|
||||
71. https://www.facebook.com/googlecloud/
|
||||
72. https://cloud.google.com/
|
||||
References:
|
||||
|
||||
[1] https://cloud.google.com/blog/#content
|
||||
[2] https://cloud.google.com/
|
||||
[4] https://cloud.google.com/blog
|
||||
[5] https://cloud.google.com/contact/
|
||||
[6] https://console.cloud.google.com/freetrial/
|
||||
[13] https://cloud.google.com/
|
||||
[14] https://cloud.google.com/blog
|
||||
[15] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning
|
||||
[16] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/api-management
|
||||
[17] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-development
|
||||
[18] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization
|
||||
[19] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/chrome-enterprise
|
||||
[20] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/compute
|
||||
[21] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/containers-kubernetes
|
||||
[22] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics
|
||||
[23] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/databases
|
||||
[24] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/devops-sre
|
||||
[25] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/maps-geospatial
|
||||
[26] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security
|
||||
[27] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure
|
||||
[28] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure-modernization
|
||||
[29] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/networking
|
||||
[30] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/productivity-collaboration
|
||||
[31] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/sap-google-cloud
|
||||
[32] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/storage-data-transfer
|
||||
[33] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/sustainability
|
||||
[34] https://cloud.google.com/transform
|
||||
[35] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/financial-services
|
||||
[36] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/healthcare-life-sciences
|
||||
[37] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/manufacturing
|
||||
[38] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/media-entertainment
|
||||
[39] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/public-sector
|
||||
[40] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/retail
|
||||
[41] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/supply-chain-logistics
|
||||
[42] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/telecommunications
|
||||
[43] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/partners
|
||||
[44] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/startups
|
||||
[45] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/training-certifications
|
||||
[46] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud
|
||||
[47] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/google-cloud-next
|
||||
[48] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/maps-platform
|
||||
[49] https://workspace.google.com/blog
|
||||
[50] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/developers-practitioners
|
||||
[51] https://cloud.google.com/transform
|
||||
[52] https://cloud.google.com/contact/
|
||||
[53] https://console.cloud.google.com/freetrial/
|
||||
[60] https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Why%20I%20love%20Go%20@googlecloud&url=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||||
[61] https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go&title=Why%20I%20love%20Go
|
||||
[62] https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?caption=Why%20I%20love%20Go&u=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||||
[63] mailto:?subject=Why%20I%20love%20Go&body=Check%20out%20this%20article%20on%20the%20Cloud%20Blog:%0A%0AWhy%20I%20love%20Go%0A%0ALearn%20all%20the%20reasons%20David%20Yach,%20industry%20veteran%20and%20Director%20of%20Engineering%20at%20Google%20Cloud,%20loves%20to%20use%20Go%20for%20software%20development.%0A%0Ahttps://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||||
[64] https://go.dev/tour/list
|
||||
[65] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization
|
||||
[66] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-development
|
||||
[67] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/open-source
|
||||
[68] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/devops-sre/using-authenticated-logins-for-docker-hub-in-google-cloud
|
||||
[69] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/the-overwhelmed-persons-guide-to-google-cloud
|
||||
[70] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/have-duet-ai-make-your-next-app-using-conversation
|
||||
[71] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/migrating-a-microservices-application-with-no-downtime
|
||||
[72] https://www.twitter.com/googlecloud
|
||||
[73] https://www.youtube.com/googlecloud
|
||||
[74] https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/google-cloud
|
||||
[75] https://www.instagram.com/googlecloud/
|
||||
[76] https://www.facebook.com/googlecloud/
|
||||
[77] https://cloud.google.com/
|
||||
[78] https://cloud.google.com/
|
||||
[79] https://cloud.google.com/products/
|
||||
[80] https://myaccount.google.com/privacypolicy?hl=en-US
|
||||
[81] https://myaccount.google.com/termsofservice?hl=en-US
|
||||
[82] https://cloud.google.com/blog/#
|
||||
[83] https://support.google.com/
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user