dce/davideisinger.com
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Include referrers in links

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
David Eisinger
2025-11-06 00:21:41 -05:00
parent 0899b91eb2
commit d0791903f3
5 changed files with 367 additions and 28 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

47
content/journal/dispatch-33-november-2025/index.md
View File

@@ -5,29 +5,37 @@ draft: false
tags:
- dispatch
references:
- title: "Software is supply-constrained (for now) | justin․searls․co"
url: https://justin.searls.co/links/2025-11-04-software-is-supply-constrained-for-now
date: 2025-11-06T05:03:05Z
file: justin-searls-co-y5dsjo.txt
- title: "Why engineers can't be rational about programming languages | spf13"
url: https://spf13.com/p/the-hidden-conversation/
date: 2025-11-06T05:07:24Z
date: 2025-11-06T05:18:51Z
file: spf13-com-enwyvy.txt
- title: "A quote from Steve Francia"
url: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Nov/4/steve-francia/
date: 2025-11-06T05:18:51Z
file: simonwillison-net-ofawt2.txt
- title: "Scripts I wrote that I use all the time"
url: https://evanhahn.com/scripts-i-wrote-that-i-use-all-the-time/
date: 2025-11-06T05:07:26Z
date: 2025-11-06T05:18:56Z
file: evanhahn-com-6hstph.txt
- title: "Offsites and Gem Getters • Buttondown"
url: https://buttondown.com/nathanlong/archive/offsites-and-gem-getters/
date: 2025-11-06T05:18:58Z
file: buttondown-com-ph2rwx.txt
- title: "What if people don't want to create things - macwright.com"
url: https://macwright.com/2025/10/21/what-if-they-dont-want-to.html
date: 2025-11-06T05:07:29Z
date: 2025-11-06T05:19:01Z
file: macwright-com-rbiipx.txt
- title: "Just Talk To It - the no-bs Way of Agentic Engineering | Peter Steinberger"
url: https://steipete.me/posts/just-talk-to-it
date: 2025-11-06T05:07:36Z
date: 2025-11-06T05:19:06Z
file: steipete-me-ayczze.txt
- title: "Just Talk To It - the no-bs Way of Agentic Engineering"
url: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Oct/14/agentic-engineering/
date: 2025-11-06T05:19:06Z
file: simonwillison-net-tmayz4.txt
- title: "Vibe engineering"
url: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Oct/7/vibe-engineering/
date: 2025-11-06T05:07:42Z
date: 2025-11-06T05:19:11Z
file: simonwillison-net-yekorg.txt
---
@@ -109,28 +117,31 @@ I went to Nashville for a team offsite last week. Highlights included [Third Man
### Links
* [Why engineers can't be rational about programming languages | spf13][18]
* [Why engineers can't be rational about programming languages | spf13][18] ([via][19])
> Every time an engineer evaluates a language that isn’t “theirs,” their brain is literally working against them. They’re not just analyzing technical trade offs, they’re contemplating a version of themselves that doesn’t exist yet, that feels threatening to the version that does. The Python developer reads case studies about Go’s performance and their amygdala quietly marks each one as a threat to be neutralized. The Rust advocate looks at identical problems and their Default Mode Network constructs narratives about why “only” Rust can solve them.
* [Scripts I wrote that I use all the time][19]
* [Scripts I wrote that I use all the time][20] ([via][21])
> In my decade-plus of maintaining my dotfiles, I’ve written a lot of little shell scripts. Here’s a big list of my personal favorites.
* [What if people don't want to create things - macwright.com][20]
* [What if people don't want to create things - macwright.com][22]
> When I look back on TileMill in 2010, Mapbox Studio, Observable, the whole arc: I can’t help but worry about the supply of creativity in society. In particular: If we give everyone the tools to build their dreams, very few people will use them.
* [Just Talk To It - the no-bs Way of Agentic Engineering | Peter Steinberger][21]
* [Just Talk To It - the no-bs Way of Agentic Engineering | Peter Steinberger][23] ([via][24])
> The benchmarks only tell half the story. IMO agentic engineering moved from “this is crap” to “this is good” around May with the release of Sonnet 4.0, and we hit an even bigger leap from good to “this is amazing” with gpt-5-codex.
* [Vibe engineering][22]
* [Vibe engineering][25]
> I feel like vibe coding is pretty well established now as covering the fast, loose and irresponsible way of building software with AI—entirely prompt-driven, and with no attention paid to how the code actually works. This leaves us with a terminology gap: what should we call the other end of the spectrum, where seasoned professionals accelerate their work with LLMs while staying proudly and confidently accountable for the software they produce?
[18]: https://spf13.com/p/the-hidden-conversation/
[19]: https://evanhahn.com/scripts-i-wrote-that-i-use-all-the-time/
[20]: https://macwright.com/2025/10/21/what-if-they-dont-want-to.html
[21]: https://steipete.me/posts/just-talk-to-it
[22]: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Oct/7/vibe-engineering/
[19]: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Nov/4/steve-francia/
[20]: https://evanhahn.com/scripts-i-wrote-that-i-use-all-the-time/
[21]: https://buttondown.com/nathanlong/archive/offsites-and-gem-getters/
[22]: https://macwright.com/2025/10/21/what-if-they-dont-want-to.html
[23]: https://steipete.me/posts/just-talk-to-it
[24]: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Oct/14/agentic-engineering/
[25]: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Oct/7/vibe-engineering/