dce/davideisinger.com
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Start April dispatch

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
David Eisinger
2025-03-31 23:34:09 -04:00
parent 931f7bb67f
commit f9a99e1133
11 changed files with 3085 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

303
static/archive/wattenberger-com-zl39ri.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
[1]
Our interfaces have
lost their senses
Think about how you experience the world—
you touch, you hear, you move.
[dance1] [dance1] [dance1] [dance1]
[dance-grou]
But our digital world has been getting flatter, more muted.
Reduced to text under glass screens.
This shift made interfaces simpler.
But was that really the goal?
An interface is the bridge between
the human
&
the machine.
[human]
[human] [machine]
It's how we tell computers what we want,
[arrow-righ]
and it's how computers communicate back to us.
[arrow-left]
The shape should fit how we work,
for ergonomics and ease of use
and it should fit how the computer works.
for simplicity and a good mental model
Recently, we've been too focused on fitting to the computer's shape, and not
enough to our own bodies.
[machine]
The Great Flattening
Computers used to be physical beasts.
We programmed them by punching cards, plugging in wires, and flipping switches.
Programmers walked among banks of switches and cables, physically
choreographing their logic. Being on a computer used to be a full-body
experience.
[tech0]
[tech1]
[transition]
Then came terminals and command lines. Physical knobs turned into typed
commands—more powerful, but our digital world became less embodied. Then came
terminals and command lines. Physical knobs turned into typed commands—more
powerful, but our digital world became less embodied. Then came terminals and
command lines. Physical knobs turned into typed commands—more powerful, but our
digital world became less embodied. Then came terminals and command lines.
Physical knobs turned into typed commands—more powerful, but our digital world
became less embodied. Then came terminals and command lines. Physical knobs
turned into typed commands—more powerful, but our digital world became less
embodied. Then came terminals and command lines. Physical knobs turned into
typed commands—more powerful, but our digital world became less embodied.
[tech2]
[transition]
We brought back some of the tactile controls with GUIs—graphical user
interfaces. We skeumorphed the heck out of our screens, with digital switches,
flat sliders, and folder icons. But we kept some of the the functionality in
the physical world, with slots to stick disks into and big ol' power buttons.
We brought back some of the tactile controls with GUIs—graphical user
interfaces. We skeumorphed the heck out of our screens, with digital switches,
flat sliders, and folder icons. But we kept some of the the functionality in
the physical world, with slots to stick disks into and big ol' power buttons.
We brought back some of the tactile controls with GUIs—graphical user
interfaces. We skeumorphed the heck out of our screens, with digital switches,
flat sliders, and folder icons. But we kept some of the the functionality in
the physical world, with slots to stick disks into and big ol' power buttons.
We brought back some of the tactile controls with GUIs—graphical user
interfaces. We skeumorphed the heck out of our screens, with digital switches,
flat sliders, and folder icons. But we kept some of the the functionality in
the physical world, with slots to stick disks into and big ol' power buttons.
We brought back some of the tactile controls with GUIs—graphical user
interfaces. We skeumorphed the heck out of our screens, with digital switches,
flat sliders, and folder icons. But we kept some of the the functionality in
the physical world, with slots to stick disks into and big ol' power buttons.
We brought back some of the tactile controls with GUIs—graphical user
interfaces. We skeumorphed the heck out of our screens, with digital switches,
flat sliders, and folder icons. But we kept some of the the functionality in
the physical world, with slots to stick disks into and big ol' power buttons.
[tech3]
[transition]
Then came touchscreens.
What a beautiful thing! We get to [2]poke things directly!
But now we live in an flat land, with everything behind a glass display case.
Then came touchscreens.
What a beautiful thing! We get to [3]poke things directly!
But now we live in an flat land, with everything behind a glass display case.
Then came touchscreens.
What a beautiful thing! We get to [4]poke things directly!
But now we live in an flat land, with everything behind a glass display case.
Then came touchscreens.
What a beautiful thing! We get to [5]poke things directly!
But now we live in an flat land, with everything behind a glass display case.
Then came touchscreens.
What a beautiful thing! We get to [6]poke things directly!
But now we live in an flat land, with everything behind a glass display case.
Then came touchscreens.
What a beautiful thing! We get to [7]poke things directly!
But now we live in an flat land, with everything behind a glass display case.
[tech4]
[transition]
With increasing amounts of AI chatbots, we're losing even more: texture, color,
shape.
Instead of interactive controls, we have a text input.
Want to edit an image? Type a command.
Adjust a setting? Type into a text box.
Learn something? Read another block of text. With increasing amounts of AI
chatbots, we're losing even more: texture, color, shape.
Instead of interactive controls, we have a text input.
Want to edit an image? Type a command.
Adjust a setting? Type into a text box.
Learn something? Read another block of text. With increasing amounts of AI
chatbots, we're losing even more: texture, color, shape.
Instead of interactive controls, we have a text input.
Want to edit an image? Type a command.
Adjust a setting? Type into a text box.
Learn something? Read another block of text. With increasing amounts of AI
chatbots, we're losing even more: texture, color, shape.
Instead of interactive controls, we have a text input.
Want to edit an image? Type a command.
Adjust a setting? Type into a text box.
Learn something? Read another block of text. With increasing amounts of AI
chatbots, we're losing even more: texture, color, shape.
Instead of interactive controls, we have a text input.
Want to edit an image? Type a command.
Adjust a setting? Type into a text box.
Learn something? Read another block of text. With increasing amounts of AI
chatbots, we're losing even more: texture, color, shape.
Instead of interactive controls, we have a text input.
Want to edit an image? Type a command.
Adjust a setting? Type into a text box.
Learn something? Read another block of text.
[tech5]
[tech6]
The Joy of Doing
We've been successfully removing all friction from our apps — think about how
effortless it is to scroll through a social feed. But is that what we want?
Compare the feeling of doomscrolling to kneading dough, playing an instrument,
sketching... these take effort, but they're also deeply satisfying. When you
strip away too much friction, meaning and satisfaction go with it.
Think about how you use physical tools. Drawing isn't just moving your
hand—it's the feel of the pencil against paper, the tiny adjustments of
pressure, the sound of graphite scratching. You shift your body to reach the
other side of the canvas. You erase with your other hand. You step back to see
the whole picture.
We made painting feel like typing,
[typing]
[art-transi]
but we should have made typing feel like painting.
[artist]
Putting the you back in UI
So how might our interfaces look if we shaped them to fit us?
We think in movement, [movement]
in space, [space]
in sound,
[sound]
in patterns.
[patterns]
We use our hands to sculpt, our eyes to scan, our ears to catch patterns.
Our computers can communicate to us in many different formats, each with their
own strengths:
Text
Great for depth, detail, and precision.
[images]
But it doesn't always have to be in full paragraphs. How about showing key
points first, then letting users expand?
Visualizations
Ideal for spatial relationships, trends, and quick insights.
[vision]
Can we show more content spatially? Or encode it in charts or colors?
Sound
Perfect for alerts and background awareness. Also, patterns.
[hearing]
Why are most web UIs silent? Can we use subtle chimes or sonification to
highlight patterns?
Haptics
Provides passive feedback (vibrations, force).
[touch]
Here's one I always forget about! We can vibrate phones to alert or convey
patterns.
And what about the reverse! We can communicate to our computers in many
different ways, each with their own strengths:
Typing
Precise, detailed, and familiar
[typing2]
Good for composing long-form thoughts, keyboard shortcuts, and rough direction.
Clicking & Dragging
Direct, fine-grained control.
[clicking]
Great for spatial tasks (design, organization) and pointing at
things-on-a-screen.
Tapping, Swiping, Pinching
Intuitive for direct manipulation.
[tapping]
Great for mobile, but do we have to limit guestures to mimicking mouse
interactions?
Gesturing
Hands-free, fluid, and expressive.
[guesturing]
Could be powerful for accessibility, quick actions, and complex fine
control—reliable detection feels very possible at this time.
Speaking
Easy for loose thoughts.
[speaking]
LLMs have made speech more viable—can we let users think out loud or navigate
roughly with their voice?
And the real magic happens when we combine different modalities. You can't read
and listen and speak at the same time—try reading this excerpt while talking
about your day:
If it had not rained on a certain May morning Valancy Stirling’s whole life
would have been entirely different. She would have gone, with the rest of her
clan, to Aunt Wellington’s engagement picnic and Dr. Trent would have gone to
Montreal. But it did rain and you shall hear what happened to her because of
it.
~ [8]The Blue Castle
But you can talk while clicking,
[click]
listen while reading,
[listen]
look at an image while spinning a knob,
[look]
guesture while talking.
[guesture]
Let's build interfaces that let us multitask across senses.
Rebuilding the bridge
So, what might a richer interface look like? I have strong conviction that our
future interfaces should:
• let us collaborate on tangible artifacts, not just ephemeral chat logs.
• support multiple concurrent modalities—voice, gestures, visuals, spatial
components.
• respond to ambient signals—detecting context, organizing information,
helping us think better.
Last year, I did a rough exploration of what this could look like for a thought
organizing tool. One that listened as you talked or typed, and organized your
rambling thoughts into cards.
This interface is very rough, but felt like a different way of working with
technology. Especially how it let me bumble through rough ideas one second,
then responded to commands like "re-group my cards" or "add 3 cards about this"
the next.
I would love to see more explorations like this!
Our interfaces have lost their senses
All day, we poke, swipe, and scroll through flat, silent screens. But we're
more than just eyes and a pointer finger. We think with our hands, our ears,
our bodies.
The future of computing is being designed right now. Can we build something
richer—something that moves with us, speaks our language, and molds to our
bodies?
[footer]
References:
[1] https://wattenberger.com/
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyBEUyEtxQo
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyBEUyEtxQo
[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyBEUyEtxQo
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyBEUyEtxQo
[6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyBEUyEtxQo
[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyBEUyEtxQo
[8] https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/67979