Files
davideisinger.com/static/archive/macwright-com-59hl5f.txt
David Eisinger daf0c46c74 August progress
2024-08-12 13:04:54 -04:00

151 lines
7.3 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
[1]Tom MacWright
tom@macwright.com
[2]Tom MacWright
• [3]Writing
• [4]Reading⇠
• [5]Photos
• [6]Projects
• [7]Drawings
• [8]Micro
• [9]About
I read The World Beyond Your Head by Matthew B. Crawford on July 7, 2024
Review
This book sat on my digital bookshelf for months. I had forgotten what prompted
me to buy it, and the title made me think that it would be a
pop-psych-economics book that repeats the title in every paragraph, like [10]
many [11]others I had [12]come across.
Crawford is definitely floating around the topic of distraction: thats the
hook that makes this book relevant and marketable.
I just read a few reviews on Goodreads before writing this, breaking my rule of
never reading book reviews before reading and reviewing books. People seem to
be annoyed at how he doesnt stick to the topic, and theyre divided on whether
the “hard philosophy” in this book is too hard or too soft. I wish I hadnt
read the reviews.
The summary: I loved this book. Its little discussions of things like the
importance of real-world difficulty in teaching us that we are physical,
limited creatures who do not have all-powerful wills. The take on
individuality: Crawford writes about the modern impulse to always prove
ourselves as competent, competitive, and entrepreneurial, and how this differs
from the older ideas of simply having a job, a role in society, and being
judged mainly on whether youre a morally good person, not whether youre a
genius or a hero.
I thought that the interludes into philosophy were perfect: they included
enough depth to get a handle on what the great thinkers were saying, but didnt
presume that the reader had a grasp on Kant or Kierkegaard already. I
occasionally read philosophy now and read some of the classics in college
(especially loved Kant and Spinoza), but Im not prepared to judge whether
Crawford is right or wrong in his points.
Quite apart from the business appeal of MOOCs for universities (payroll is
a lamentable thing), mechanizing instruction is appealing also because it
fits with our ideal of epistemic self-responsibility.
The discussion of education and “epistemic responsibility” was fantastic. It
connects so much to the idea of “unschooling” which is really popular with one
of my social circles. (for the new-to-it, [13]unschooling is an informal
learning style in which students are expected to learn from natural life
including play, and there are often teachers present but there is no set
curriculum. Unschooling has a foothold in technology because of books like [14]
Mindstorms and the idea that kids can self-educate with computers. It also has
a strong relationship with libertarianism in the sense that freedom is a common
value, and schools are described as coercive, and also that an education system
based on unschooling would require fewer institutions, especially those of the
government-run variety. I am emphatically not a libertarian and view those
overlaps as a major reason to be skeptical.)
Crawford argues that enlightenment-era thinking as well as the particularly
American Emerson/Thoreau-era philosophers think that only self-attained
knowledge really counts, and they undervalue culture and social bonds in
general, but especially those between teachers and pupils.
That is what computer games seem to do for our quasi-autistic cohort of
young men; it is what machine gambling does for those who have gone down
that particular path. Perhaps such pursuits help us manage the anxiety and
depression that come when experiences of genuine agency are scarce, and at
the same time we live under a cultural imperative of being autonomous.
Theres also a really solid discussion of gambling and its role in society.
Ive been thinking about gambling a lot recently. I dont gamble, and have no
intent or inclination to ever gamble. But Ive seen gambling dynamics appear in
a lot of unexpected places.
For example - theres a fintech called [15]Yotta that recently failed and has
potentially lost its customers money. It was a [16]“lottery-based savings
account”, which is a series of words Id never expect together. This is a whole
category called [17]prize-linked savings accounts. Its crazy.
The power of gambling is scary to understand, but I think that this book makes
a very strong argument that all of the psychic energy that flows into gambling
comes from the lack of genuine agency, opportunity, and certainty in the rest
of society.
Sidenote: this book uses autism as a metaphor or descriptor for behaviors and
thoughts, quite a lot. I didnt find this very inappropriate or incorrect, but
if you dont want to read a book that talks about that, proceed with caution.
The question that hovers over your character is no longer that of how good
you are, but of how capable you are, where capacity is measured in
something like kilowatt hours—the raw capacity to make things happen. With
this shift comes a new pathology. The affliction of guilt has given way to
weariness—weariness with the vague and unending project of having to become
ones fullest self. We call this depression.
This idea of the cause of depression - the weariness of having to prove oneself
capable - resonated hard with me. Maybe theres something true and vital here,
or maybe he and I have the same kind of sad, who is to say!
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This is a book about a bunch of different topics that float around the modern
condition, capitalism, attention, and individuality. The whole thing was really
engaging for me, and extremely thought provoking. I found myself reconsidering
my conception of myself, work, friends, and values. It might do the same for
you!
Or it might not! I was in the right head space for this read, and was happy to
follow the sometimes-meandering trails. At times, this book can read like an
Adam Curtis documentary - tying together big ideas and statements about modern
times that seem a little too cute to be true.
But its on a short list of books that I finished and immediately thought about
re-reading in a few months.
Details
• The World Beyond Your Head by Matthew B. Crawford
• ISBN13: [18]9780374535919
• Published: 2015
• Publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
References:
[1] https://macwright.com/
[2] https://macwright.com/
[3] https://macwright.com/writing/
[4] https://macwright.com/reading/
[5] https://macwright.com/photos/
[6] https://macwright.com/projects/
[7] https://macwright.com/drawings/
[8] https://macwright.com/micro/
[9] https://macwright.com/about/
[10] https://macwright.com/2018/10/02/against-charity
[11] https://macwright.com/2022/02/09/laziness-does-not-exist
[12] https://macwright.com/2022/08/01/against-creativity
[13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unschooling
[14] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindstorms_(book)
[15] https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/21/synapse-collapse-nearly-109m-in-yotta-customer-deposits-vanish.html
[16] https://moneywise.com/banking/banking-reviews/yotta-review
[17] https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/banking/prize-linked-sweepstakes-savings-accounts
[18] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources?isbn=9780374535919