davideisinger.com/static/archive/hedgehogreview-com-5syd8y.txt

IASC

[1]Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture

  • [2]About
  • [3]Research
  • [4]Scholars
  • [5]News & Events
  • [6]Support Our Work

[7]Hedgehog [8]The Hedghog Review -- Critical Reflections on Contemporary
Culture

  • [9]Issues
  • [10]Browse
  • [11]Web Features
  • [12]About
  • [13]Contact
  • [14]
  • [15]Login
  • [17] Order
  • [19]

  • [20]Issues
  • [21]Browse
  • [22]Web Features
  • [23]About
  • [24]Contact
  • [25]
  • [26]Login
  • [27] Order

[28]THR Web Features   /   June 11, 2024

AI as Self-Erasure

Humanity’s will to disappear is being installed in the omni-operating system.

[29]Matthew B. Crawford

( Piranka/iStock.)
[30] THR Web Features

[31]Matthew B. Crawford

Matthew B. Crawford writes the Substack [32]Archedelia and is a senior fellow
at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture at the University of Virginia.
His books include Why We Drive: Toward a Philosophy of the Open Road, The World
Beyond Your Head: On Becoming an Individual in an Age of Distraction, and the
best-selling Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry Into the Value of Work.

Categories

  • [33]Essays

Related Topics

  • [34]Work
  • [35]Technology
  • [36]Self

Share

  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]

Elevated “deaths of despair” and declining birth rates in the West must be due
to an array of factors, hard to tease apart. My hunch is that one of them is
what the sociologist Richard Sennett called “the specter of uselessness.” He
meant feeling redundant at work. But there is a deeper, existential version of
this that may arise when the world feels already occupied, so there is no place
for you to grow into and make your own.

In the normal course of human society, you are born into a culture that has
prepared the way for you. It initiates you into its language and tells a story
of where you came from. It is saturated with meaning due to a chain of
begettings that reaches back in time, each generation of which started and grew
through acts of love: at conception, and in the ongoing work of teaching,
transmission and care. The world is welcoming, in other words. It was built by
your ancestors, and they imagined you long before you arrived.^[41]11[42]xThe
“owned space” spoken of by our Nietzscheans is an inherited space, not a
conquest of individual will. They wondered what sort of work you might do,
before you knew there is such a thing as work. Your parents may have recognized
the echo of a sibling or a parent in your face as you sought the nipple. They
smiled at you.

This sense of a world handed down in love is interrupted when the basic
contours and possibilities of life appear to be ordered by impersonal forces.

Small Language Models

I was at a small dinner a few weeks ago in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Seated next
to me was a man who related that his daughter had just gotten married. As the
day approached, he had wanted to say some words at the reception, as is fitting
for the father of the bride. It can be hard to come up with the right words for
such an occasion, and he wanted to make a good showing. He said he gave a few
prompts to ChatGPT, facts about her life, and sure enough it came back with a
pretty good wedding toast. Maybe better than what he would have written. But in
the end, he didn’t use it, and composed his own. This strikes me as telling,
and the intuition that stopped him from deferring to AI is worth bringing to
the surface.

To use the machine-generated speech would have been to absent himself from this
significant moment in the life of his daughter, and in his own life. It would
have been to not show up for her wedding, in some sense. I am reminded of a
passage in Tocqueville where he noticed that America seemed to be on a
trajectory that would have it erecting “an immense tutelary power” that wants
only what is best for us, and is keen to “save [us] the trouble of living.”

In Aristotelian language, human “being” is an ergon, an activity or work that
is distinctive of the peculiar sort of animals that we are, and in this the use
of language is key. There have been rare cases of anatomically normal children
who (whether by some monstrous crime or by circumstance) matured without human
society, with no initiation into a language. They grew into feral creatures,
resembling a human in form only.^[43]22[44]x “Just before dawn on January 9,
1800, a mysterious creature emerged from a forest in southern France. Although
he was human in form and walked upright, his habits were those of a young male
animal. He was wearing only a tattered shirt, but did not seem troubled by the
cold. Showing no modesty about his nakedness, he ate greedily, seizing roasted
potatoes from a hot fire. He seemed to have no language skills, only grunting
occasionally.” From the [45]jacket of The Forbidden Experiment by Roger
Shattuck. 

LLMs (large language models such as ChatGPT) won’t return us to a
pre-linguistic state, but they do point to a post-human one. In The Language
Animal, Charles Taylor points out that in our use of language, “we are
continuously responsive to rightness, and that is why we always recognize the
relevance of a challenge that we have misspoken.” In other words, we care.

This is because, unlike an LLM or a parrot, things have significance for us,
and we search for words that will do justice to this significance. For example,
you try to find words that are apt for a wedding toast: ideally something both
true and pleasing, maybe built around some anecdote that is emblematic of your
relationship with your daughter, hopefully funny, with just the right
touch—warm but not maudlin, suggesting the subtle and evolving currents of
affection (and maybe conflict, too) between you over the years as she has grown
into a woman. You don’t want to over-share, but you want to take some risks
too, because you sense that showing faith in the love of your daughter, and in
the goodwill of your guests (some of whom you have never met) will create the
enlarged circle of intimacy and witness that you are hoping to realize on this
occasion.

As the father sits with pen and paper, he strives to encompass in words the
elusive truth of his daughter, as seen from the unique vantage of a father, in
a way fitting for this pivotal moment in the progression of her life. He may
find that through the effort of articulating this relationship, it is more
fully revealed to him. As Taylor says, the “right word” discloses, “brings the
phenomenon properly into view for the first time. Discovery and invention are
two sides of the same coin; we devise an expression which allows what we are
striving to encompass to appear.”

We do this also with respect to ourselves; we “self-articulate” as part of the
lifelong process of bringing ourselves more fully into view‚ how I stand, the
particular shape that various universal goods have taken in my own biography,
and in my aspirations. This is a moving target. One may cringe at one’s younger
self. What appeared to be an episode of courage at eighteen now strikes me as
dickishness; what seemed righteous then looks self-righteous now as I fill in
my own past with fresh articulations, corresponding to fresh intimations of the
good, the fruit of a long process of acquiring depth as a human being. Or I may
try to look back at my younger self with kindness, in the hope of overcoming
regret about the decisions I made. We do all this with words, in our internal
monologues.

What would it mean, then, to outsource a wedding toast? To use Heidegger’s
language, some entity has “leaped in” on my behalf and disburdened me of the
task of being human. For Heidegger, this entity is “das Man,” an anonymized
other that stands in for me, very much like Kierkegaard’s “the Public.” It is a
generalized consciousness—think of it as the geist of large language models.

LLMs are built on enormous data sets—essentially, all language that is
machine-scrapable from the Internet. They are tasked with answering the
question, “given the previous string of words, what word is most likely to
occur next?” They thus represent what the philosopher Talbot Brewer recently
referred to as “the statistical center of gravity” of all language (and I am
following Brewer’s lead in viewing LLMs through the lens of Taylor’s account of
language). Or rather, all language that is on the Internet. This includes the
great literature of the past, of course. But it includes a whole lot more of
the present: marketing-speak, what passes for journalism, the blather produced
by all who suffer from PowerPoint brain. But put aside the impoverished quality
of the language that these LLMs are being trained on. If we accept that the
challenge of articulating life in the first person, as it unfolds, is central
to human beings, then to allow an AI to do this on our behalf suggests
self-erasure of the human.

In a presentation in Charlottesville in April that is yet unpublished, at
University of Virginia’s Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture, Brewer
referred to “degenerative AI.” Because the new AIs are language machines, they
are “aimed right at our essence.” Brewer is not himself a Christian, but he
finds Christian terms apt for thinking about the problem: We are created in the
image and likeness of God, who is the Word.

Talking to an Anonymity

Self-erasure through absorption into a mass (as distinct from a community) is
not a problem created by LLMs; it was noticed by Heidegger and Kierkegaard, and
by Tocqueville before them. Around the turn of the millennium, we were
fascinated with “the wisdom of crowds” and the generative possibilities of the
hive mind. We were told that there is a superior global intelligence arising in
the Web itself. This collective mind is more meta, more synoptic and synthetic,
than any one of us, and aren’t these the defining features of intelligence?

[46]Writing about the Web in 2006, Jaron Lanier said that “In the last year or
two the trend has been to remove the scent of people, so as to come as close as
possible to simulating the appearance of content emerging out of the Web as if
it were speaking to us as a supernatural oracle.” He was referring to
“consensus Web filters” that assemble material from other sites that are
themselves aggregators of other sites. “We are now reading what a collectivity
algorithm derives from what other collectivity algorithms derived from what
collectives chose from what a population of mostly amateur writers wrote
anonymously.”

Lanier points out that these developments aren’t confined to online culture.
The elevation of the collective through the fetish of aggregation is “having a
profound influence on how decisions are made in America,” in government
agencies, corporate planning departments, and universities. He reports that, as
a consultant, he used to be asked to “test an idea or propose a new one to
solve a problem. In the last couple years I’ve been asked to work quite
differently. You might find me and the other consultants filling out survey
forms or tweaking edits to a collective essay.”

Lanier suggests there are institutional reasons for the appeal of collectivism
in large organizations: “If the principle is correct, then individuals should
not be required to take on risks or responsibilities.” This is especially
attractive given that we live in times of tremendous uncertainties coupled with
infinite liability phobia, and we must function within institutions that are
loyal to no executive, much less to any lower-level member. Every individual
who is afraid to say the wrong thing within his or her organization is safer
when hiding behind a wiki or some other Meta aggregation ritual.

In his own participation in such rituals, Lanier reports that “what I’ve seen
is a loss of insight and subtlety, a disregard for the nuances of considered
opinions, and an increased tendency to enshrine the official or normative
beliefs of an institution.”

At the same gathering in Charlottesville where Tal Brewer spoke of
“degenerative AI,” sociologist Joseph E. Davis pointed out that AI is rushing
into domains that have already been vacated of the full exercise of human
judgment, making the substitution less obviously a degradation. Education is
conceived as the mere exchange of information, unconditioned by relations of
authority and care between teacher and student. The practice of medicine has
been partly reduced to following guidelines that claim to advance
“evidence-based medicine” (but with outcomes that are often worse than those
produced by the judgments of experienced practitioners).^[47]33[48]xSee Justin
Mutter, “A New Stranger at the Bedside: Industrial Quality Management and the
Erosion of Clinical Judgment in American Medicine” for an [49]account of the
exponential growth of guidelines that medical practitioners must follow, and
its effect on care. Essentially, doctors have been proletarianized and are
themselves the object of minute surveillance. Their incentives are to follow
guidelines even when they know the outcome will not be good.  Dating apps
render the process of selecting a mate as something machine-optimizable through
search criteria and “cross-platform integration with social media accounts” (or
something like that).

But let us go back further yet, before the rise of the Web, to see how AI
expresses (and advances) a more general tendency of the democratic social
condition. Writing in the 1840s, Kierkegaard noticed something significant
going on with the rise of the newspaper:

    Nowadays one can talk with anyone, and it must be admitted that people’s
    opinions are exceedingly sensible, yet the conversation leaves one with the
    impression of having talked to an anonymity.... Our judgments are “so
    objective, so all-inclusive, that it is a matter of complete indifference
    who expresses them.... In Germany they even have phrase books for the use
    of lovers, and it will end with lovers sitting together talking
    anonymously. (Kierkegaard, The Present Age)

The German lovers “go meta,” as we would put it today, which is a kind of
effacing of one’s own perspective as an interested party, as someone involved.
We instead think of ourselves as representatives of a general Public.

    [W]e think over the relationships of life in a higher relationship till in
    the end the whole generation has become a representation, who
    represent...it is difficult to say whom; and who think about these
    relationships...for whose sake it is not easy to discover. The disobedient
    youth is no longer in fear of his schoolmaster—the relation is rather one
    of indifference in which schoolmaster and pupil discuss how a good school
    should be run. To go to school no longer means to be in fear of the master,
    or merely to learn, but rather implies being interested in the problem of
    education. (Kierkegaard, The Present Age)

Kierkegaard here connects the process of becoming a third party to oneself to
the process of democratic leveling. This has the effect of effacing real human
connection.

    In the end, the whole age becomes a committee. A father no longer curses
    his son in anger, using all his parental authority, nor does the son defy
    his father, a conflict which might end in the inwardness of forgiveness; on
    the contrary, their relationship is irreproachable, for it is really in
    process of ceasing to exist... (Kierkegaard, The Present Age)

For Kierkegaard, differentiating relations of authority are the incubators of
genuine attachments, and these in turn make possible moments of rebellion. It
is through the attachments and the rebellions both that we become individuals.
Fake egalitarianism provides an excuse—no, a principle!—for shrinking from this
task. As representatives of a general Public, there is no complementarity
between us, no differentiation and dependence, but instead a colorless cohesion
of interchangeable, autonomous subjects. Liberal public culture is a culture of
polite separation.

This mood of interchangeability is likely to deepen as AI saturates the world
and we are tempted to let it stand in for our own subjectivity. But, like that
father at his daughter’s wedding, we are still free to refuse it.

This essay first appeared on Matthew Crawford’s [50]Archedelia Substack.

 

[minihog-ri]

Sign up for our newsletter

Email Address * [51][                    ]
[52][                    ]
Sign Up
[54] Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture [55] University of Virginia

Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture

  • [56]About
  • [57]Research
  • [58]Scholars
  • [59]News & Events
  • [60]Contact IASC

The Hedgehog Review

  • [61]Issues
  • [62]Browse
  • [63]THR Web Features
  • [64]About
  • [65]Contact
  • [66]Search
  • [67]Log In
  • [68]Order

Join the Conversation

  • [69]
  • [70]

[71]Support our work

© 2025 Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture

' +

Search articles, blog posts, and people

[72][                    ]
Close Search
×

Login

[76][                    ]
[77][                    ]

[79]Forgot your password?

Login [81]No account? Subscribe now

References:

[1] http://iasculture.org/
[2] http://iasculture.org/about
[3] http://iasculture.org/research
[4] http://iasculture.org/scholars
[5] http://iasculture.org/events
[6] https://iasculture.org/support
[7] https://hedgehogreview.com/
[8] https://hedgehogreview.com/
[9] https://hedgehogreview.com/issues
[10] https://hedgehogreview.com/topics
[11] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features
[12] https://hedgehogreview.com/about
[13] https://hedgehogreview.com/contact
[14] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[15] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[17] https://hedgehogreview.com/order
[19] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[20] https://hedgehogreview.com/issues
[21] https://hedgehogreview.com/topics
[22] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features
[23] https://hedgehogreview.com/about
[24] https://hedgehogreview.com/contact
[25] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[26] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[27] https://hedgehogreview.com/order
[28] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr
[29] https://hedgehogreview.com/contributors/matthew-b-crawford
[30] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr
[31] https://hedgehogreview.com/contributors/matthew-b-crawford
[32] https://mcrawford.substack.com/
[33] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/categories/essays
[34] https://hedgehogreview.com/topics/work
[35] https://hedgehogreview.com/topics/technology
[36] https://hedgehogreview.com/topics/self
[37] https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fhedgehogreview.com%2Fweb-features%2Fthr%2Fposts%2Fai-as-self-erasure
[38] https://twitter.com/intent/tweet/?text=AI%20as%20Self-Erasure&url=https%3A%2F%2Fhedgehogreview.com%2Fweb-features%2Fthr%2Fposts%2Fai-as-self-erasure&via=hedgehogreview
[39] http://www.reddit.com/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhedgehogreview.com%2Fweb-features%2Fthr%2Fposts%2Fai-as-self-erasure&title=AI%20as%20Self-Erasure
[40] javascript:window.print();
[41] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[42] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[43] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[44] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[45] https://books.google.com/books?id=9COPTtX16IIC&q=%22forbidden+experiment%22&pg=PP1
[46] https://www.edge.org/conversation/jaron_lanier-digital-maoism-the-hazards-of-the-new-online-collectivism?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
[47] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[48] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[49] https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/748875
[50] https://mcrawford.substack.com/?utm_source=global-search
[54] https://iasculture.org/
[55] http://www.virginia.edu/
[56] http://iasculture.org/about
[57] http://iasculture.org/research
[58] http://iasculture.org/scholars
[59] http://iasculture.org/events
[60] http://iasculture.org/contact
[61] https://hedgehogreview.com/issues
[62] https://hedgehogreview.com/topics
[63] https://hedgehogreview.com/blog
[64] https://hedgehogreview.com/about
[65] https://hedgehogreview.com/contact
[66] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[67] https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/ai-as-self-erasure#
[68] https://hedgehogreview.com/order
[69] https://facebook.com/TheHedgehogReview
[70] https://twitter.com/hedgehogreview
[71] https://iasculture.org/support
[79] https://hedgehogreview.com/reset-password
[81] https://hedgehogreview.com/order