368 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
368 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
#[1]home
|
||
|
||
[2]Jump to Content
|
||
|
||
Cloud
|
||
(BUTTON)
|
||
[3]Blog
|
||
[4]Contact sales [5]Get started for free
|
||
____________________
|
||
|
||
Cloud
|
||
[6]Blog
|
||
|
||
* Solutions & technology
|
||
+ [7]AI & Machine Learning
|
||
+ [8]API Management
|
||
+ [9]Application Development
|
||
+ [10]Application Modernization
|
||
+ [11]Chrome Enterprise
|
||
+ [12]Compute
|
||
+ [13]Containers & Kubernetes
|
||
+ [14]Data Analytics
|
||
+ [15]Databases
|
||
+ [16]DevOps & SRE
|
||
+ [17]Maps & Geospatial
|
||
+ [18]Security & Identity
|
||
+ [19]Infrastructure
|
||
+ [20]Infrastructure Modernization
|
||
+ [21]Networking
|
||
+ [22]Productivity & Collaboration
|
||
+ [23]SAP on Google Cloud
|
||
+ [24]Storage & Data Transfer
|
||
+ [25]Sustainability
|
||
* Ecosystem
|
||
+ [26]IT Leaders
|
||
+ Industries
|
||
o [27]Financial Services
|
||
o [28]Healthcare & Life Sciences
|
||
o [29]Manufacturing
|
||
o [30]Media & Entertainment
|
||
o [31]Public Sector
|
||
o [32]Retail
|
||
o [33]Supply Chain
|
||
o [34]Telecommunications
|
||
+ [35]Partners
|
||
+ [36]Startups & SMB
|
||
+ [37]Training & Certifications
|
||
+ [38]Inside Google Cloud
|
||
+ [39]Google Cloud Next & Events
|
||
+ [40]Google Maps Platform
|
||
+ [41]Google Workspace
|
||
* [42]Developers & Practitioners
|
||
* [43]Transform with Google Cloud
|
||
|
||
[44]Contact sales [45]Get started for free
|
||
____________________
|
||
|
||
Application Modernization
|
||
|
||
Why I love Go
|
||
September 12, 2022
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
|
||
David Yach
|
||
|
||
Director of Engineering at Google Cloud
|
||
|
||
I’ve been building software over the last four decades, as a developer,
|
||
manager and executive in both small and large software companies. I
|
||
started my career working on commercial compilers, first BASIC and then
|
||
C. I have written a lot of code in many different languages, and
|
||
managed teams with even broader language usage.
|
||
|
||
I learned Go about 5 years ago when I was CTO at a startup/scaleup. At
|
||
the time, we were looking to move to a microservice architecture, and
|
||
that shift gave us the opportunity to consider moving away from the
|
||
incumbent language (Scala). As I read through the Go tutorials, my
|
||
compiler-writing background came back to me and I found myself
|
||
repeatedly thinking “That’s cool – I know why the Go team did that!â€<C3A2> So
|
||
I got hooked on the language design.
|
||
|
||
Learning
|
||
|
||
I have worked with many different computer languages over the years, so
|
||
I was not surprised I could quickly get started writing Go programs
|
||
after reading through the online documents and tutorials. But then when
|
||
I saw a new co-op student (a.k.a. intern) learn Go and write a
|
||
substantial prototype in their first two weeks on the job, it became
|
||
clear that Go was much easier to learn than many other languages.
|
||
|
||
Writing code
|
||
|
||
As I started writing my first Go programs, the first thing that struck
|
||
me was the blazing compiler speed. It was as fast or faster starting my
|
||
application than many interpreted languages, yet it was a compiled
|
||
program with a strongly typed language. (I have an affinity for
|
||
strongly typed languages – I have spent way too much time tracking down
|
||
obscure issues in my own code in dynamic typed languages, where the
|
||
same issue would have been a compile error in a strongly typed
|
||
language.) Even better, in Go I often don’t need to declare the type –
|
||
the compiler figures it out.
|
||
|
||
I was impressed with the standard Go library – it included many of the
|
||
capabilities required by modern applications – things like HTTP
|
||
support, JSON handling and encryption. Many other languages required
|
||
you to use a third-party library for these features, and often there
|
||
were multiple competing libraries to choose from, adding another
|
||
decision point for the developer. With Go, I could go to the standard
|
||
library GoDoc and get started right away.
|
||
|
||
There were a few other language decisions that I found helpful. One is
|
||
that the compiler figures out if you are returning a pointer to a
|
||
local, and behind the scenes allocates the memory rather than using the
|
||
stack. This prevents bugs, and I find the code more readable.
|
||
|
||
I also like that you don’t declare that you support an interface. I
|
||
wasn’t sure I would like this at first because it isn’t obvious if a
|
||
type implements a particular interface, but I found greater value in
|
||
the fact that I wasn’t dependent on the code author (even if it was
|
||
me!) to declare that the interface is implemented. This first hit home
|
||
when I used fmt.Println() and it automatically used the String() method
|
||
I had implemented even though it hadn’t occurred to me that I was
|
||
implementing the Stringer interface.
|
||
|
||
The last feature I’ll note is the ability to do concurrent programming
|
||
through channels and goroutines. The model is simple to understand yet
|
||
powerful.
|
||
|
||
Reading code
|
||
|
||
After writing more Go code and starting to incorporate third party
|
||
libraries, I had a realization that had never occurred to me before –
|
||
as a developer, I spend a lot of time reading code. In fact, I probably
|
||
spend more time reading code than writing it, once you start counting
|
||
code reviews, debugging, and evaluating third-party libraries.
|
||
|
||
What was different about reading Go code? I would summarize it by “it
|
||
all looks the same.â€<C3A2> What do I mean by that? Go format ensures all the
|
||
braces are in the same spot; capitalized identifiers are exported;
|
||
there are no implicit conversions, even of internal types; and there is
|
||
no overloading of operators, functions or methods. That means that with
|
||
Go code, “what you see is what you getâ€<C3A2> with no hidden meaning. Of
|
||
course, it doesn’t help me to understand a complicated algorithm, but
|
||
it does mean that I can concentrate more on that algorithm because I
|
||
don’t have to understand whether ‘+’ is overloaded, for example.
|
||
|
||
I was also pleasantly surprised when I used GoDoc on one of my
|
||
projects, and discovered that I had semi-reasonable documentation
|
||
without doing anything while writing the code other than adding
|
||
comments on my functions and methods based on nagging from the IDE I
|
||
was using. I did spend some time cleaning up the comments after that,
|
||
but I’m not sure I would have even started that work if Go hadn’t given
|
||
me a great starting point.
|
||
|
||
Testing code
|
||
|
||
Go test is part of the standard Go tools and supported by IDEs, making
|
||
it easy to get started creating unit tests for my code. And like the
|
||
standard Go library, having a standard way to do tests means I don’t
|
||
have to evaluate external testing frameworks and select one. I can also
|
||
understand the tests when I’m evaluating a third party library.
|
||
|
||
Even better, the default behavior running package tests in VSCode is to
|
||
enable Go’s built-in code coverage. I had never taken code coverage
|
||
seriously working in other languages, partly because it was often
|
||
difficult to set up. But the immediate feedback (helped by the blazing
|
||
compile speed) gamified this for me, and I found myself adding tests to
|
||
increase code coverage (and finding new bugs along the way).
|
||
|
||
Go doesn’t allow circular dependencies between packages. While this has
|
||
caused me some rethinking while writing code, I find it makes my
|
||
testing regimen easier to think about – if I depend on a package, I can
|
||
rely on that package to have its own tests covering its capabilities.
|
||
|
||
Deploying code
|
||
|
||
I learned Go at the same time we were migrating towards container-based
|
||
microservices. In that environment, the fact that Go produces a single,
|
||
self-contained executable makes it much easier and more efficient to
|
||
build and manage containers. I can build a container layer with one
|
||
single file, which is often a single-digit number of MB in size,
|
||
compared to our prior JVM-based containers which started with hundreds
|
||
of MB for the Java runtime then another layer for our application. (It
|
||
is easy to forget how much this overhead ends up costing in production,
|
||
particularly if you have hundreds or thousands of containers running).
|
||
|
||
Second, Go has built-in cross compiling capabilities so our development
|
||
machines, containers and cloud hardware don’t all have to all be on the
|
||
same processor or operating system. For example, I can use a Linux
|
||
build machine to produce client executables for Linux, Mac and Windows.
|
||
Again, this takes away a complicated decision process due to artificial
|
||
constraints.
|
||
|
||
Finally, Go has established a well defined set of principles for
|
||
versioning and compatibility. While not all pieces of this are
|
||
enforced, having the principles from an authoritative source helps
|
||
manage the real life challenges of keeping your software supply chain
|
||
up to date. For example, it is strongly recommended that breaking
|
||
changes require a new major version number. While not enforced, it
|
||
leads the community to call out any open source package that violates
|
||
this principle.
|
||
|
||
What do I miss?
|
||
|
||
I did miss generics; thankfully Go 1.18 added support. And I do wish
|
||
the standard library offered immutable collections (like Scala and
|
||
other functional languages). Embedding instead of inheritance works
|
||
pretty much the same in many cases, but requires some deep thinking
|
||
sometimes.
|
||
|
||
My most frequent coding mistake is when I should have used a pointer
|
||
receiver for a method and didn’t, then modify the receiver expecting
|
||
the changes to be visible when the method returns. The code looks
|
||
correct, the right values get assigned if I use a debugger to step
|
||
through or issue prints, but the changes disappear after the method
|
||
returns. I think I would have preferred if receivers were immutable, it
|
||
would have caught these errors at compile time, and in the few
|
||
remaining cases where I wanted to modify the receiver I would have
|
||
copied it to a local variable.
|
||
|
||
In conclusion
|
||
|
||
As you can tell, I am a huge fan of Go, from even before I joined
|
||
Google. I am impressed by the language and ecosystem design, and by the
|
||
implementation. For me, Go makes me a more productive developer and I’m
|
||
more confident in the quality of the code I produce.
|
||
|
||
Go, give it a [46]try!
|
||
|
||
Posted in
|
||
* [47]Application Modernization
|
||
* [48]Application Development
|
||
* [49]Open Source
|
||
|
||
Related articles
|
||
|
||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/containers
|
||
_2022_anH39my.max-700x700.jpg
|
||
DevOps & SRE
|
||
|
||
Best practices for consuming public Docker Hub content
|
||
|
||
By Rishi Mukhopadhyay • 2-minute read
|
||
|
||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/General-GC
|
||
_Blog_header_2436x1200-v1.max-700x700.jpg
|
||
Google Cloud
|
||
|
||
The overwhelmed person’s guide to Google Cloud: week of Dec 18
|
||
|
||
By Forrest Brazeal • 2-minute read
|
||
|
||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Google_Clo
|
||
ud_AIML_thumbnail.max-700x700.jpg
|
||
AI & Machine Learning
|
||
|
||
Have the AI build your app for you!
|
||
|
||
By Max Saltonstall • 2-minute read
|
||
|
||
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/DO_NOT_USE
|
||
_Wfx45fA.max-700x700.jpg
|
||
Application Modernization
|
||
|
||
Apollo24|7: Migrating a complex microservices application to Google Cloud
|
||
with zero downtime
|
||
|
||
By Nishu Saxena • 4-minute read
|
||
|
||
Footer Links
|
||
|
||
Follow us
|
||
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
|
||
* [50]Google Cloud
|
||
* [51]Google Cloud Products
|
||
* [52]Privacy
|
||
* [53]Terms
|
||
* [54]Cookies management controls
|
||
|
||
* [55]Help
|
||
* [‪English‬__€¬..]
|
||
|
||
References
|
||
|
||
Visible links:
|
||
1. https://cloud.google.com/?lfhs=2
|
||
2. https://cloud.google.com/blog/#content
|
||
3. https://cloud.google.com/blog
|
||
4. https://cloud.google.com/contact/
|
||
5. https://console.cloud.google.com/freetrial/
|
||
6. https://cloud.google.com/blog
|
||
7. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning
|
||
8. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/api-management
|
||
9. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-development
|
||
10. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization
|
||
11. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/chrome-enterprise
|
||
12. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/compute
|
||
13. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/containers-kubernetes
|
||
14. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics
|
||
15. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/databases
|
||
16. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/devops-sre
|
||
17. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/maps-geospatial
|
||
18. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security
|
||
19. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure
|
||
20. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure-modernization
|
||
21. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/networking
|
||
22. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/productivity-collaboration
|
||
23. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/sap-google-cloud
|
||
24. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/storage-data-transfer
|
||
25. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/sustainability
|
||
26. https://cloud.google.com/transform
|
||
27. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/financial-services
|
||
28. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/healthcare-life-sciences
|
||
29. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/manufacturing
|
||
30. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/media-entertainment
|
||
31. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/public-sector
|
||
32. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/retail
|
||
33. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/supply-chain-logistics
|
||
34. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/telecommunications
|
||
35. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/partners
|
||
36. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/startups
|
||
37. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/training-certifications
|
||
38. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud
|
||
39. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/google-cloud-next
|
||
40. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/maps-platform
|
||
41. https://workspace.google.com/blog
|
||
42. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/developers-practitioners
|
||
43. https://cloud.google.com/transform
|
||
44. https://cloud.google.com/contact/
|
||
45. https://console.cloud.google.com/freetrial/
|
||
46. https://go.dev/tour/list
|
||
47. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization
|
||
48. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-development
|
||
49. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/open-source
|
||
50. https://cloud.google.com/
|
||
51. https://cloud.google.com/products/
|
||
52. https://myaccount.google.com/privacypolicy?hl=en-US
|
||
53. https://myaccount.google.com/termsofservice?hl=en-US
|
||
54. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||
55. https://support.google.com/
|
||
|
||
Hidden links:
|
||
57. https://cloud.google.com/
|
||
58. https://cloud.google.com/
|
||
59. https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Why%20I%20love%20Go%20@googlecloud&url=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||
60. https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go&title=Why%20I%20love%20Go
|
||
61. https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?caption=Why%20I%20love%20Go&u=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||
62. mailto:?subject=Why%20I%20love%20Go&body=Check%20out%20this%20article%20on%20the%20Cloud%20Blog:%0A%0AWhy%20I%20love%20Go%0A%0ALearn%20all%20the%20reasons%20David%20Yach,%20industry%20veteran%20and%20Director%20of%20Engineering%20at%20Google%20Cloud,%20loves%20to%20use%20Go%20for%20software%20development.%0A%0Ahttps://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/why-david-yach-loves-go
|
||
63. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/devops-sre/using-authenticated-logins-for-docker-hub-in-google-cloud
|
||
64. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/the-overwhelmed-persons-guide-to-google-cloud
|
||
65. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/have-duet-ai-make-your-next-app-using-conversation
|
||
66. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/application-modernization/migrating-a-microservices-application-with-no-downtime
|
||
67. https://www.twitter.com/googlecloud
|
||
68. https://www.youtube.com/googlecloud
|
||
69. https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/google-cloud
|
||
70. https://www.instagram.com/googlecloud/
|
||
71. https://www.facebook.com/googlecloud/
|
||
72. https://cloud.google.com/
|