commit a1b0894ea290f563695de6273fe1e4de6d23a425
parent 6593cc876846cdeeaa261251c3003144e4f41eec
Author: David Eisinger <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 00:00:40 -0400
Copy in outline
Diffstat:
2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/content/journal/migrating-from-github-to-sourcehut/index.md b/content/journal/migrating-from-github-to-sourcehut/index.md
@@ -7,5 +7,36 @@ references:
url: https://drewdevault.com/2021/04/26/Cryptocurrency-is-a-disaster.html
date: 2024-10-31T20:10:12Z
file: drewdevault-com-yuxzdw.txt
+- title: "Switching to SourceHut Builds - Tim Hårek"
+ url: https://timharek.no/blog/switching-to-sourcehut-builds
+ date: 2024-11-01T03:59:37Z
+ file: timharek-no-becx2e.txt
---
+* Why?
+ * GH/MS kind of lame
+ * Sales people
+ * AI
+ * This is my place to do things just so
+ * Git is decentralized/open source; GitHub is centralized/closed source
+ * I like and follow DD (maybe not)
+ * Tim Harek uses it
+* Stuff to know
+ * No actions marketplace
+ * `&` doesn't work
+ * Secrets go in files, not environment variables
+ * Shared config file
+ * Disable logging
+* I paid for it
+ * Happy to support independents
+ * Cheaper than self hosting Gitea or similar
+ * [Cryptocurrency is an abject disaster][1]
+
+---
+
+* [Switching to SourceHut Builds - Tim Hårek](https://timharek.no/blog/switching-to-sourcehut-builds)
+* <https://git.sr.ht/~timharek/timharek.no/tree/main/item/.build.yml>
+* <https://git.sr.ht/~dce/mdrenum/tree/main/item/.build.yml>
+* <https://git.sr.ht/~dce/davideisinger.com/tree/main/item/.build.yml>
+
+[1]: https://drewdevault.com/2021/04/26/Cryptocurrency-is-a-disaster.html
diff --git a/static/archive/timharek-no-becx2e.txt b/static/archive/timharek-no-becx2e.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+[1]Skip to content[2]
+Tim Hårek
+
+ • [3]Blog
+ • [4]About
+ • [5]More…
+
+ 1. [6]Index
+ 2. [7]Blog
+ 3. [8]Switching to SourceHut Builds
+
+[9][10](Photo)[11][email protected][12]PGP key
+
+Switching to SourceHut Builds
+
+Published December 8, 2022
+Last updated June 18, 2023
+2 minutes read
+
+Earlier this year in a post, [13]What should you choose for deploying your
+static websites?, I wrote about what CI/CD[^1] you should chose for your static
+websites. And I concluded on using just using git-hooks. Well, by the title of
+this post you've probably guessed that I'm indeed changing my mind.
+
+After using this workflow for a while for a few projects I've realized a few
+things.
+
+ 1. I miss having proper version control for the testing, building and
+ deploying steps.
+ 2. It requires more effort to setup.
+ 3. I need to manually configure notifications for when something goes wrong.
+
+There are probably more things, but these are the ones that have bothered me
+the most. For step #2 I made a shell-script, [14]git-hooks, so that I don't
+have to remember every intricate detail each the time.
+
+So why [15]SourceHut? [16]Last time I wrote about this topic I found out their
+tool is the easiest to configure and use in my opinion. They have support for
+hosting of static sites, and you also have access to a bunch of packages for
+the [17]different images they provide. Ben Busby's blogpost, [18]GitHub vs
+GitLab vs SourceHut, also helped me switch to SourceHut. A key difference
+between my git-hooks workflow vs SourceHut builds is speed, my git-hooks
+workflow took a few seconds, but with SourceHut it takes up to 1 minute. But
+I'm in no rush.
+
+As of writing I've moved my personal website over to SourceHut's build-system,
+and I've moved the website for the place I live ([19]my post about it) to it as
+well. This project didn't even use git-hooks, it used GitHub Actions. My plan
+is to move [20]Everyday Privacy over, which is using Vercel today. I also want
+to start adding more tests and checks to my other small projects, so that I can
+get notified if something doesn't pass after I've pushed to remote.
+
+I'm looking forward to using SourceHut more, I like how simple it is. It takes
+away a lot of unnecessary bits that other source-forges has.
+
+[^1]: Short for: Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment
+
+Tagged with
+
+ • [21]#cicd
+ • [22]#devops
+ • [23]#git
+ • [24]#sourcehut
+
+363 words
+
+[25]Reply via email
+Last deploy: 2024-10-23
+
+ • [26]Stats
+ • [27]Privacy
+ • [28]Connect
+ • [29]Subscribe
+
+
+References:
+
+[1] https://timharek.no/blog/switching-to-sourcehut-builds#main
+[2] https://timharek.no/
+[3] https://timharek.no/blog
+[4] https://timharek.no/about
+[5] https://timharek.no/more
+[6] https://timharek.no/
+[7] https://timharek.no/blog
+[8] https://timharek.no/blog/switching-to-sourcehut-builds
+[9] https://timharek.no/
+[10] https://timharek.no/.well-known/avatar?size=250&quality=90
+[11] mailto:[email protected]
+[12] https://timharek.no/public-key.asc
+[13] https://timharek.no/blog/what-should-you-choose-for-deployment
+[14] https://github.com/timharek/git-hooks
+[15] https://sourcehut.org/
+[16] https://timharek.no/blog/what-should-you-choose-for-deployment
+[17] https://man.sr.ht/builds.sr.ht/compatibility.md
+[18] https://benbusby.com/gh-vs-gl-vs-sh/
+[19] https://timharek.no/blog/i-made-a-website-for-the-place-i-live/index
+[20] https://everyday-privacy.com/
+[21] https://timharek.no/tags/cicd
+[22] https://timharek.no/tags/devops
+[23] https://timharek.no/tags/git
+[24] https://timharek.no/tags/sourcehut
+[25] mailto:[email protected]?subject=RE:%20Switching%20to%20SourceHut%20Builds
+[26] https://timharek.no/stats
+[27] https://timharek.no/privacy
+[28] https://timharek.no/connect
+[29] https://timharek.no/subscribe
